RE:if raj wants kick Maharashtra out of indias MAP
by nimish kapadia on Feb 24, 2008 06:47 PM Permalink
i got a better idea we must negotiate with pakistan to stop terrorosm in india they r fighting for kashmir i think we should tell them let kashmir remain with india pakistan can take ayway up and bihar both states are a liablitty on india and are of no use to india
RE:if raj wants kick Maharashtra out of indias MAP
by shalini verma on Feb 24, 2008 06:58 PM Permalink
But before that you should be kicked out of Indian and dropped in the middle of the ocean with a stone around your neck saying Jai Maharashtra!
RE:RE:if raj wants kick Maharashtra out of indias MAP
by arun kumar on Feb 24, 2008 06:53 PM Permalink
then those same pakistaanis which ur mother would have negotiated raped her....cuz u peoples are filthy coward greaady and lazy fellas unable to do anything other than doing suicides. when pakistaanis come for ur ass what wold u do ..doing suicides by hanging on trees or some other better means
RE:if raj wants kick Maharashtra out of indias MAP
by vishal saxena on Feb 24, 2008 06:54 PM Permalink
in that case ur mumbai will come to halt. Go and check with Economic survey, most of the resources to mumbai comes from Bihar.
RE:RE:if raj wants kick Maharashtra out of indias MAP
by vishal saxena on Feb 24, 2008 06:57 PM Permalink
these politicians have not developed bihar otherwise bihar would be the most prosperous state in India. Problem with u people is that though u reside in metro but are really illeterate. Does not know anything but want to say b******t. Sir please concentrate on studies rather than s**t things
recently during railway recruitment(b & c grade positions) in bangalore there were more than 75% of biharis and handfull of kannadigas SHORTLISTED. the biharis were given token by lalu which facilitated them with free lodging in bangalore alongwith free train ticket from bihar to karnataka. As of yesterday and day before, 900 punjabis were interviewd for taxi drivers post for bangalore international airport.This was opposed by karnataka rakshana vedike,which is commendable. As for as migrants are concerned, they have to integrate into the society in which they migrated and not the other way. MigranTs go on top of the head to the extent saying without migrants there is no bangalore(FOR EG.). Such attitude only costs their own existence in that particular society. I dont mean to hurt them. migration is very important where one can see different ppl with different culture and languages. But there should always be a limit. TOO MUCH IS TOO BAD. Like how the minorities should be treated and not overemphasized same way minority migrants should not be overemphasized
RE:I support
by vishal saxena on Feb 24, 2008 07:00 PM Permalink
sir also remember that even today's bangalore is existing due to migrants or noth indians. Check any IT industry most are from North Indians otherwise these south Indians they do not want to work. due to us only they have raised rent to 10 times, auto's jusk ask for one and a half or double. That way we migrants are actually feeding these guys.
RE:I support
by Avinash Dsouza on Feb 24, 2008 06:51 PM Permalink
So which migrants should be allowed - the rich migrants or the poor migrants; Are we saying that the lower level jobs for the 'local' populace, while the creme de la creme for non-locals?
RE:I support
by chandu on Feb 24, 2008 06:56 PM Permalink
My point is: for doing minial jobs one can find local labours in abundance. once can hindi people issuing tickets in railway platforms speaking in hindi which the villagers cant understand. whats the use of recruiting ppl who donno local language.
RE:indian cricket team ko bachao , sachin gha*ti tendulkar ko bhagao. lol
by rexberry on Feb 24, 2008 06:44 PM Permalink
Kahaan US main baithke Time pass kar raha hain... ismain kaunsa khushi mil raha hai tujhe
