Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1935 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Marathis Cheated
by vivakanandadharmik on Feb 07, 2010 09:54 PM  Permalink 

Raj Thackeray says that UP and Biharis are outsiders and they should not come and work in Mumbai. But


a Maratha Empire ruled till Delhi including Uttar Pradesh and parts of Bihar etc..
b Rani Laxmibai a marathi ruled Jhansi in Uttar Pradesh.
c Vasundara Raje a Marathi was the Chief Minister of Rajhastan, she belong to scindya family of Madhya Pradesh
d Scindya Family of Madhya Pradesh are marathis.


Does that means that in those days Marathis went and occupied territories and jobs of UP and Bihari people.



Raj Thackeray says that Vidarbha should not be separated from Maharastra because Maharashtra was Shivaji Maharaj's empire. But Shivajiraje's empire was called Maratha Empire and not Maharashtra. Maratha empire consisted of entire Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Delhi, Parts of RajputanaRajhasthan, Jharkand, Chattigarh, Parts of Bihar, VijapurBijapur, Tajorein Tamil Nadu, in that case why these territories are left outside Maharastra even they should have been Part of Maharastra.
First of all Raj Thackeray is not Chattrapati Raj Thackeray. Secondly, Raj Thackeray is not Shivaji Maharaja's legal Heir.
shivajiraje never attacked unarmed enemies, whereas Raj Thackeray and his men hurt unarmed common man whether it is Bihari Taxi drivers or Marathi Ramesh kini and Marathi Ambadas Dharrao.

Shivajiraje told about Hindavi Swaraj and not Maratha Swaraj or Marathi Swaraj. Why?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Marathis Cheated
by vivakanandadharmik on Feb 07, 2010 09:32 PM  Permalink 

Raj Thackeray says that UP and Biharis are outsiders and they should not come and work in Mumbai. But


a) Maratha Empire ruled till Delhi including Uttar Pradesh and parts of Bihar etc..
b) Rani Laxmibai a marathi ruled Jhansi in Uttar Pradesh.
c) Vasundara Raje a Marathi was the Chief Minister of Rajhastan, she belong to scindya family of Madhya Pradesh
d) Scindya Family of Madhya Pradesh are marathis.


Does that means that in those days Marathis went and occupied territories and jobs of UP and Bihari people.



Raj Thackeray says that Vidarbha should not be separated from Maharastra because Maharashtra was Shivaji Maharaj's empire. But Shivajiraje's empire was called Maratha Empire and not Maharashtra. Maratha empire consisted of entire Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Delhi, Parts of Rajputana(Rajhasthan), Jharkand, Chattigarh, Parts of Bihar, Vijapur(Bijapur), Tajore(in Tamil Nadu), in that case why these territories are left outside Maharastra even they should have been Part of Maharastra.
First of all Raj Thackeray is not Chattrapati Raj Thackeray. Secondly, Raj Thackeray is not Shivaji Maharaja's legal Heir.
shivajiraje never attacked unarmed enemies, whereas Raj Thackeray and his men hurt unarmed common man whether it is Bihari Taxi drivers or Marathi Ramesh kini and Marathi Ammbadas Dharrao

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Marathis Cheated
by vivakanandadharmik on Feb 07, 2010 09:32 PM  Permalink 

Raj Thackeray says that UP and Biharis are outsiders and they should not come and work in Mumbai. But


a) Maratha Empire ruled till Delhi including Uttar Pradesh and parts of Bihar etc..
b) Rani Laxmibai a marathi ruled Jhansi in Uttar Pradesh.
c) Vasundara Raje a Marathi was the Chief Minister of Rajhastan, she belong to scindya family of Madhya Pradesh
d) Scindya Family of Madhya Pradesh are marathis.


Does that means that in those days Marathis went and occupied territories and jobs of UP and Bihari people.



Raj Thackeray says that Vidarbha should not be separated from Maharastra because Maharashtra was Shivaji Maharaj's empire. But Shivajiraje's empire was called Maratha Empire and not Maharashtra. Maratha empire consisted of entire Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Delhi, Parts of Rajputana(Rajhasthan), Jharkand, Chattigarh, Parts of Bihar, Vijapur(Bijapur), Tajore(in Tamil Nadu), in that case why these territories are left outside Maharastra even they should have been Part of Maharastra.
First of all Raj Thackeray is not Chattrapati Raj Thackeray. Secondly, Raj Thackeray is not Shivaji Maharaja's legal Heir.
shivajiraje never attacked unarmed enemies, whereas Raj Thackeray and his men hurt unarmed common man whether it is Bihari Taxi drivers or Marathi Ramesh kini and Marathi Ammbadas Dharrao

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Raj--the terrorist
by ashish tiwari on Feb 04, 2010 09:22 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Till the time I believed terrorists are only Islamic..but Raj thakery proves that terrorists have no religion

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re: Raj--the terrorist
by Pradeep Tondwalkar on Aug 22, 2010 02:07 AM  Permalink
your sur name shows that u r bhayya and you are rightly thinking that way, because u people are begger and are begging for jobs in mumbai and maharashtra, y dont u stay in Bihar and work their isted of going to other places and destroying local culture their forcing your language there? y? do u have answar for this? no.. You and all Biharis and UPiens are real terrorist who goes to other places and makt the place hell for local people there.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Raj--the terrorist
by Ram Kumar on Feb 05, 2011 06:26 PM  Permalink
U MARATIHIS ARE LOSERS. U DO NOT HAVE ANY JOBS, BECAUSE YOU ARE LAZY, PATHETIC AND UNPROFESSIONAL AND YOU BLAME OTHERS FOR THAT!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Raj--the terrorist
by hinduhitler on Aug 22, 2010 11:48 AM  Permalink
I support ur view - Pradeep

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re
by NIRAJ SRIVASTWA on Feb 04, 2010 08:37 AM  Permalink 

The recent controversy is Sena stir against Shahrukh's recent remarks on IPL players. This is my advice to Raj and Uddhav not to intimidate the film celebrities. Shahrukh is a billionaire. You cannot harm Sharukh in any way. He alongwith his family members can settle in abroad. He and Amitabh are tall figures. they are very popular faces of India. they can jeoparadize your political careers to
a great extent. This is my further advice to Uddhav to refrain from such dirty politics. You and Raj will get nothing from such politics. Widen your thinking from regional level to national level. Your father's innings is already over. He may any time say good bye to this earth. But you have to play long time batting and fielding in the political field.

NIRAJ CHANDRA SRIVASTWA

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hindi terrorism
by Nilesh Dharkar on Feb 01, 2010 06:06 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I think MNS is only opposing Hindi terrorism!!!

Hindi speakers are not welcome any where in world whether in Punjab, Assam, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu ..... Mumbai ..... Australia .... and now UK.

I think Northie should not be consider as Humans ...... they are barbarians!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re: Hindi terrorism
by ashish tiwari on Feb 04, 2010 09:20 AM  Permalink
Maharashtrians are definitely uncivilized.. we should impose hindi all over maharashtra and ban marathi..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Hindi terrorism
by aboli mogara on Feb 10, 2010 12:55 PM  Permalink
then do the same thing for south Indians & ready to face disaster.
They will never tolerate Hindsm terror

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: Hindi terrorism
by aboli mogara on Feb 10, 2010 12:53 PM  Permalink
then do the same thing for south Indians & ready to face disaster.
They will never tolerate Hindsm terror

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Hindi terrorism
by Ram Kumar on Feb 05, 2011 06:29 PM  Permalink
U MARATIHIS ARE LOSERS. U DO NOT HAVE ANY JOBS, BECAUSE YOU ARE LAZY, PATHETIC AND UNPROFESSIONAL AND YOU BLAME OTHERS FOR THAT!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Hindi terrorism
by Ram Kumar on Feb 05, 2011 06:30 PM  Permalink
U MARATIHIS ARE LOSERS. U DO NOT HAVE ANY JOBS, BECAUSE YOU ARE LAZY, PATHETIC AND UNPROFESSIONAL AND YOU BLAME OTHERS FOR THAT!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hindi terrorism
by Nilesh Dharkar on Feb 01, 2010 06:06 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I think MNS is only opposing Hindi terrorism!!!

Hindi speakers are not welcome any where in world whether in Punjab, Assam, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu ..... Mumbai ..... Australia .... and now UK.

I think Northie should not be consider as Humans ...... they are barbarians!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re: Hindi terrorism
by ashish tiwari on Feb 04, 2010 09:20 AM  Permalink
Maharashtrians are definitely uncivilized.. we should impose hindi all over maharashtra and ban marathi

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hindi terrorism
by Nilesh Dharkar on Feb 01, 2010 06:05 PM  Permalink 

I think MNS is only opposing Hindi terrorism!!!

Hindi speakers are not welcome any where in world whether in Punjab, Assam, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu ..... Mumbai ..... Australia .... and now UK.

I think Northie should not be consider as Humans ...... they are barbarians!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hindi terrorism
by Nilesh Dharkar on Feb 01, 2010 06:05 PM  Permalink 

I think MNS is only opposing Hindi terrorism!!!

Hindi speakers are not welcome any where in world whether in Punjab, Assam, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu ..... Mumbai ..... Australia .... and now UK.

I think Northie should not be consider as Humans ...... they are barbarians!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 1935 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message