The more Muslim league type politicians take center stage, Hindu surge will be that much stronger
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 23, 2008 10:04 AM Permalink | Hide replies
Look at Ansaris in Eastern UP, and how they have been decimated by Yogiji's Hindu Yova Vahini.
People are sick of these Muslim pampering and will not tolerate it any more.
As long as commentetors like this, Muslim appeaement exists, future of a strong, growing BJP is secured
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 23, 2008 06:59 AM Permalink | Hide replies
As long as commentetors like this, Muslim appeaement exists, future of a strong, growing BJP is secured/
This author termed Sardar Patel as anti-Muslim few days back in a column in the Tribune, Chandigrah
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 23, 2008 06:53 AM Permalink | Hide replies
If we are talking about the unity in India, we must note some disparities in terms of rights that exist today. People say that people of all religions should have the same rights. But that is far from reality. In India there are different set of Civil Laws for followers of different religions. We have Hindu Civil Law, Muslim Civil Law, Christain Cicil Law and Parsi Civil Law. Is it right thing to treat people differently on the basis of religion? Lets see what it means.
A Muslim man can marry 4 women legally. For others polygamy is a criminal offence. A Muslim man can divorce his wife by uttering talaq thrice. While for the Hindus divorce is only acceptable as a last resort and the court tries all kinds of avenues to prevent divorce. Why are there different standards of morals for different people? After divorce a Muslim man is only obliged to support his wife for her 3 lunar months, while women of other religion could get a better deal in terms of alimony. After a divorce a Muslim women would rarely get the custody of her child. But the women of other religions have better rights in terms of custody of their children. A Muslim woman inherits only half of the share of a Muslim man. Why is there a discrimination based on religion? If the father of a Hindu man converts to Islam that person would be deprived from inheriting his father's property as no non Muslim can inherit a Muslim's property. Why such a discrimination based on religion has been allowed by the Law in In
RE:Need for uniform civil code in India
by crazyforsense on Feb 23, 2008 06:29 AM Permalink
@secularmindedhindu
Ahhhh...refreshing to meet someone who is what they profess to be.
Dont get me wrong buddy, i am neither a supporter or opponent of any political party. I just dont like parties promising something good and not living up to it.
UCC is a great idea and I bet most people want it.....likewise BJP had some very good ideas unfortunately it has not been able to implement them either at state or center.
I wish we had new parties........nice to meet you.
If we are talking about the unity in India, we must note some disparities in terms of rights that exist today. People say that people of all religions should have the same rights. But that is far from reality. In India there are different set of Civil Laws for followers of different religions. We have Hindu Civil Law, Muslim Civil Law, Christain Cicil Law and Parsi Civil Law. Is it right thing to treat people differently on the basis of religion? Lets see what it means.
A Muslim man can marry 4 women legally. For others polygamy is a criminal offence. A Muslim man can divorce his wife by uttering talaq thrice. While for the Hindus divorce is only acceptable as a last resort and the court tries all kinds of avenues to prevent divorce. Why are there different standards of morals for different people? After divorce a Muslim man is only obliged to support his wife for her 3 lunar months, while women of other religion could get a better deal in terms of alimony. After a divorce a Muslim women would rarely get the custody of her child. But the women of other religions have better rights in terms of custody of their children. A Muslim woman inherits only half of the share of a Muslim man. Why is there a discrimination based on religion? If the father of a Hindu man converts to Islam that person would be deprived from inheriting his father%u2019s property as no non Muslim can inherit a Muslim's property. Why such a discrimination based on religion has been allowed by the Law
RE:Need for uniform civil code in India
by secularmindedhindu on Feb 23, 2008 05:05 AM Permalink
I am not supporting BJP. But I am only saying that UCC should replace the Civil Laws based on religion.
RE:Need for uniform civil code in India
by crazyforsense on Feb 23, 2008 06:28 AM Permalink
@secularmindedhindu
Ahhhh...refreshing to meet someone who is what they profess to be.
Dont get me wrong buddy, i am neither a supporter or opponent of any political party. I just dont like parties promising something good and not living up to it.
UCC is a great idea and I bet most people want it.....likewise BJP had some very good ideas unfortunately it has not been able to implement them either at state or center.
I wish we had new parties........nice to meet you.
Christians and muslims are modern day rakshashas because they believe their god will forgive them and take them to heaven, for sure, no matter how many crimes they commit.
For proof read "Jesus is ravana" at myspace.com/vidhu2 and/or myspace.com/rakesh22
Read any of his privious article.Normally they are anti saffron and pro muslims for reasons best known to him.He should know that RSS and BJP philosophy is to see UNITY in Indian Pluralism(call it diversity).One should read Deen Dyal Upadhaya's 'EKATMVAAD'.RSS always hated regionalism,provincialism .Read any of their article written in the past.So Amulya Ganguly is wrong when he says that BJP have learnt to respect pluralism in India after attacks on North Indians.It is a open secret that every 'secular' including the writer is bent upon encouraging regionalism,casteism in Hindus so that they fight with each other so that Saffrons do not win.Because BJP or Shiv Sena can win only if there is unity in Hindus and if the Muslims and Christians of India do not forget their ancestors.Unfortunately the 'the seculars' are extremely powerful and can manouvre the happenings/events to happen.It is bad luck of India,specially the majority society of India i.e. the Hindus,Otherwise,out of all,Marathas attacking North Indians?Impossible.But 'secular' writers and Doordarshan are making it possible.I only wish RSS also possesses its own TV Channels as Communists,missionaries and Arabian INTERESTS have in India-NDTV,IBN etc,as ORGNISER or PANCHJANYA will not do much. By the way RSS have brought unity in Pluralism by worshiping or praying daily BHARAT MATA in Shakhas and that is why communists and Islamists hate Bharat Mata.Regards.
RE:AMULYA GANGULY IS BASICALLY A COMMUNIST AND HINDU HATER
by Pradip Parekh on Feb 22, 2008 10:41 PM Permalink
good post ramesh ji, and i agree. this commie ganguly guy has proved himself to be a tactless fool several times in past. nearly all indian professors teaching south asian studies in the various universities across usa are mischevous commies.
RE:AMULYA GANGULY IS BASICALLY A COMMUNIST AND HINDU HATER
by Ramesh Anand on Feb 22, 2008 08:09 PM Permalink
These attacks onNorth Indians are being manouvred to disrupt the unity in Hindus which was increasing in leap and bound so that BJP does not win next general elections.Indians should expect more such things in the coming next year till general elections are over.Hence it is the duty of every Hindu to be aware of this conspiracy and ensure that unity is maintained
RE:AMULYA GANGULY IS BASICALLY A COMMUNIST AND HINDU HATER
by brij seth on Feb 22, 2008 08:40 PM Permalink
Dear Ramesh, these things are not going to affect the prospects of Saffron party-BJP.Infact it may help.You may get the pleasant surprise by 2008 or 09.One intellectual(I forgot his name)said that by 2011,India will be completely a changed nation-no more 'seculars or traitors in the name of secularism'
RE:AMULYA GANGULY IS BASICALLY A COMMUNIST AND HINDU HATER
by Jivendra on Feb 22, 2008 08:46 PM Permalink
Yes, this pluralism is our Indian pluralism.Sankaracharya did wonders because of this pluralism because basically we are and were Vedic people.Pluralism coming from out side is an attack on our values and life but still we are capable of making comfortable adjustments with those plurals too.I agree Ganguly is pseudo Hindu.
