Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1535 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Psuedo Logic
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 22, 2008 08:58 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


Psuedo author writes>They may not mind an occasional riot, as in Gujarat, to teach the Muslims a lesson.

If Muslims in Mumbai can riot for more than one month after Ayodhya, why Guj Hindus are NOT entitled to do the same after Godhra?

This psuedo logic, inability to condemn Muslim aggression is root of all problem in India.

PEOPLE WAIT TO SEE ACTIONS BY ADMIN. WHEN THEY SEE NOTHING HAPPENS FOR MUSLIM VOTEBANK, THEY TAKE ACTIONS ON THEIR OWN!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Psuedo Logic
by R K Reddy on Feb 22, 2008 09:00 AM  Permalink
So you want to turn india into a tribal society where there is no rule of law? Just like 5000 years ago when people formed groups and attacked each other?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Psuedo Logic
by Supersecualirist on Feb 22, 2008 01:03 PM  Permalink
As if you know what happened 5000 years ago. You are fed on Indian History created by the Moghuls and and the British rulers.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Psuedo Logic
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 22, 2008 09:01 AM  Permalink

U HIT ME, PSUEDOS TAKE NO ACTION FOR VOTE.

WHAT YOU EXPECT PEOPLE TO DO AFTER FEW YEARS, DECADES?

THEY HIT YOU BACK. WITH MUCH MORE INTENSITY!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Psuedo Logic
by R K Reddy on Feb 22, 2008 09:03 AM  Permalink
Ok. Then you are right. Maybe India deserved to become a tribal society. Afterall if we have people who want to kill each other we do not deserve to be called a developed country. We should be called a wild country.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Psuedo Logic
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 22, 2008 09:07 AM  Permalink

TOLERANCE TOWARDS AGGRESSIVE MUSLIMS ONLY EMBOLDEN THEM.

ONLY STRONG ACTION IS A GREAT DETERRENT.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Psuedo Logic
by R K Reddy on Feb 22, 2008 09:10 AM  Permalink
Strong action ? I dont think there is anything strong in killing children. Or raping nuns or burning churches. Its a sign that you are afraid. Afraid of losing your religion.

Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Psuedo Logic
by Pradip Parekh on Feb 22, 2008 09:37 AM  Permalink
we hindus are very afraid of the hindutvas.They will make us lose our religion.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Pseudo Sonia
by passionate rebel on Feb 22, 2008 08:56 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Pseudo Congress Pseudo President Pseudo Sonia Writes under Pseudo name Amul Gandguly

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Pseudo Sonia
by san man on Feb 22, 2008 09:33 AM  Permalink
BJP = BRAHMIN JANATA PARTY

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Pseudo Sonia
by subbu on Feb 22, 2008 09:48 AM  Permalink
SAN MAN= JEHADI, OR MISSIONARY

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Pseudo Sonia
by Sahadevan KK on Feb 22, 2008 10:14 AM  Permalink
Rule through Reservation

At last Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders agreed to give 33-50% reservation for the wives and daughters of goons, killers, kidnappers, 'Tehelka serial' actors and porn CD actors who are already in leadership. Senior leaders on February 21, 2008 reiterated the party%u2019s commitment to providing 33 per cent reservation for women in Parliament and State Assemblies.

One world's longest 'PM in waiting' said at the rally, "Ideally there should be 50 per cent reservation for women in Parliament and the State Assemblies, but we will be happy to back the government at the Centre if they are serious about bringing in 33 per cent reservation. Reservation is the only item on the Common Minimum Programme of the UPA government for women, sadly they haven%u2019t been able to deliver even that one promise."

Other gentleman Venkaiya Naidu said, "If you have the political will, bring in the Bill." But there is no a single idiotic cadre or supporter to ask where was the same will when BJP ruled India.

Another leader Rajnath Singh said, "Thirty-three per cent reservation is the right of the Indian women and it is something that had been promised to them." But Alas! He was forgetting (befooling people) 'Stall Parliament' was BJP's 'right' for previous four years as it is an opposition party.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
secularism
by Muraleedharan c on Feb 22, 2008 08:54 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Mr gaguly first know secularisam it is not appleasement

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:secularism
by R K Reddy on Feb 22, 2008 08:55 AM  Permalink
this article is about pseudo-sikularism of BJP.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Very nice article
by R K Reddy on Feb 22, 2008 08:53 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

A very good article. As long as we keep giving safe haven to facist and extremists like BJP, India can never attain the status of a developed country.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Very nice article
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 22, 2008 08:55 AM  Permalink

Convert from Andhra, related to Y Samuel reddy?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Very nice article
by R K Reddy on Feb 22, 2008 08:56 AM  Permalink
Whats there to get personal about mate? Then why make personal comments ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Very nice article
by Comment on Feb 22, 2008 08:55 AM  Permalink
and Untill and unless we have people like u in the county we would be ruled by Britishers and Moghuls as in past.
Because of people like u we would become underdeveloped.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Very nice article
by R K Reddy on Feb 22, 2008 08:58 AM  Permalink
Really. So what kind of development you propose ? This article addressess the core of the problem. Once you start dividing people you will never stop at anything. For a strong nation we need integrity not division.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Very nice article
by Supersecualirist on Feb 22, 2008 01:07 PM  Permalink
The core of the problem is that all people of India are not subject to the same Civil laws. Also people of a particular State enjoy extra rights over other States of India. Unless these are addressed, India can never be a strong nation. And Jehadi supporters like yourself are adding fuel to the fire.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Composite Culture does NOT mean Muslim reservation, Grabbing Hindu temple Land, distribute them amonsgt Muslims..................
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 22, 2008 08:52 AM  Permalink 


Composite Culture does NOT mean Muslim reservation, Grabbing Hindu temple Land, distribute them amonsgt Muslims..................as done in Andhra, Assam, and so many places.

BJP IS FOR EQUALITY FOR ALL, APPEASEMENT OF NONE.

PSUEDOS LIKE AMULYA GANGULY HAS LOST ALL RELEVANCE- NOBODY BELIEVES THEIR POLMEIC.

AND YES, HINDU BACKLASH IS COMING- LED BY EDUCATED MIDDLE CLASS.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Pseudo secular or Pseudo Hindu or Pseudo Nationalist
by V S on Feb 22, 2008 08:49 AM  Permalink 

These are just words.

All Indian political parties are fundamentally corrupt and misuse the law to hurt the common man.

The need of the hour is to curb corruption and remove criminal elements from all parties.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Amulya Ganguli is an unabashed Pro-Jehadi, Anti-Hindu, psuedo secular
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 22, 2008 08:47 AM  Permalink 


It was ONLY Advani amongst top leaders, not Sonia, or MMSingh, who condemned Mumbai Violence.

Fact is, it was abatted by NCP and Congress. NO THE LECTURING BY AMULYA GANGULI DOES NOT ARISE.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Shut Up - Being Anti Islamist and Anti North Indian are Two Different Things
by Singha on Feb 22, 2008 08:42 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Islamism is an international ideolgogy that estalbishes arab weltanschuang on India.

It is something nationalists will need to fight. I am not voting BJP if they refuse to do it.

Vajpayee was pseudo secular and I never voted for him. Well Mahatma Advaniji and Mahatma modiji are of different mettle. Advaniji despite the Jinnah fiasco understands islamism and its effects on India such as partition.

Will vote for BJP bcoz it has Advaniji and Modiji.

You bong, if u can not understand the nature of anti national ideologies like islamism, christianism and communism are welcome to either go to bongdesh or ur commie hell in kolkata


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Shut Up - Being Anti Islamist and Anti North Indian are Two Different Things
by V S on Feb 22, 2008 08:49 AM  Permalink
and you fanatic right wing hindus are a disgrace to modern india.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Shut Up - Being Anti Islamist and Anti North Indian are Two Different Things
by kraft on Feb 22, 2008 09:01 AM  Permalink
Righrwingers like Singha are far better than the 80Plus crowd of Shit from Kolkatta. These rogues from Kolkatta were hypocritical and opposed NAME Changes in Bombay,etc. but they themselves gleefully changed Calcutta to Kolkatta! Their Master JyotiBasu after spoiling Bengal for 50 Years has at the age of 95 realised that bengal needs CAPITALISM!!
Have you sen a bigger Moron? Atleast he has owned up publicly.The other rogues go about as if they have done a lot to the nation with their stupid IDEOLOGY!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Shut Up - Being Anti Islamist and Anti North Indian are Two Different Things
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 22, 2008 08:54 AM  Permalink

What's your full name, V S? Do you go under Burkha when so many Muslim/Xtian pampering sops are given, caste identity are created?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Shut Up - Being Anti Islamist and Anti North Indian are Two Different Things
by R K Reddy on Feb 22, 2008 08:54 AM  Permalink
Well said. These people bring so much shame to the great nation of ours.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Shut Up - Being Anti Islamist and Anti North Indian are Two Different Things
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 22, 2008 08:55 AM  Permalink

Converts like you are nati0national.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Shut Up - Being Anti Islamist and Anti North Indian are Two Different Things
by Comment on Feb 22, 2008 08:57 AM  Permalink
peole like VS(brokers) are disgrace on earth.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:Shut Up - Being Anti Islamist and Anti North Indian are Two Different Things
by Comment on Feb 22, 2008 09:01 AM  Permalink
People like Reddy and VS become happy when their fav UPA annouces pension to relatives of terrorists in Kashmir. So that terrorist can kill innocent people and their relative will get pension . You are people become happy when hard income of tax payers goes as pension to the terrorist family.
NO i m not surprised , why india was ruled by moghuls and Bristishers being such a big country only because of poeple like u.
who are anitnational and can sell anything for money and greed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Check out ''Vande Matharam Lata Hemant'' in You Tube
by Singha on Feb 22, 2008 08:41 AM  Permalink 

Lata rocks. Look at the song description too.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
BJP Pseudo-Secular Na Na
by R Desai on Feb 22, 2008 08:34 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


BJP is not Pseudo-Secular period.

They are Pseudo-Nationalists and Pseudo-Hindus.

They are just bunch of jokers and power hungry.

Example: in 1998 when Advani was minister...he said...National Song is not compulsory to muslims:

in.rediff.com/news/1998/nov/21vande.htm

Once we thrown him out of power...he cry..not singing National Song is anti-national...is this not hypocrisy?


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:BJP Pseudo-Secular Na Na
by Singha on Feb 22, 2008 08:40 AM  Permalink
"beta" read between the lines.

islamist is not going to sing vande matharam voluntary.

If BJP comes to power as single party, musalmaan will automatically sing vande matharam.

See Gujarat, musalmaan has fallen in line. U have to speak to them from a position of strength.

Do remember that Advaniji was directly responsible for felling that obnoxious entity - Babri structure.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:BJP Pseudo-Secular Na Na
by V S on Feb 22, 2008 08:51 AM  Permalink
singing vade mataram is hardly an issue on which you should judge anyone.

how many hindus can sing vande mataram first line only ?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:BJP Pseudo-Secular Na Na
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Feb 22, 2008 08:53 AM  Permalink

THE ISSUE WAS SETTLED IN LATE 1930s BY NO LESS THAN TAGORE, NEHRU.

THOSE MUSLIMS WHO HAVE PROBLEM SINGING NATIONAL SONG HAVE NO PLACE IN INDIA.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:BJP Pseudo-Secular Na Na
by R Desai on Feb 22, 2008 08:36 AM  Permalink

Now Pseudo-Hindu and Pseudo-Nationalist like Tatha will jump on me!

Congress is the only party to rule at the center...let it be smaller parties like BJP in Gujrat, Shiv Sena in Maharashtra...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 1535 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Write a message