1) Quickly aligning with US to fight terror despite knowing ISI and masses will be unhappy 2) Paving way for first genuinely democratic elections in Pakistan 3) Ensuring cultural freedom in Pakistan by allowing modern music and television to flourish 4) Pushing back Talibanisation of Pakistan; only modernising ruler Pakistan has seen in its history 5) Good relations with India despite starting on a negative note of Kargil and Parliament attack 6) Supposed to personally non-corrupt and honest on financial dealings
RE:Musharraf's positive role in South Asia
by Peaceful Protest on Feb 19, 2008 03:55 PM Permalink
there is a common tendancy to criticise and hate Musharraf. However, it is also feared that his successors could be much worse and more dangerous...not only to India but the entire world. We can only keep our fingers crossed.
RE:RE:HI
by Secular India on Feb 19, 2008 03:39 PM Permalink
NIL - there is no point fighting over stuff you cannot control. Its best to govern and protect what you already control.
RE:HI
by sameer on Feb 19, 2008 11:48 PM Permalink
IF PORKISTAN DOESNT REMEMBER THAT KASHMIR IS A PART OF INDIA.. SO INDIA DOES NOT REMEMBER EITHER IF IT GAVE ITS LAND TO PORKISTAN.AS FOR STUFF WE CAN OR CANNOT CONTROL WE ONLY NEED ONE ABLE LEADER WHO IS NOT CORRUPT WHICH IS NOT DIFFICULT.
RE:HI
by Postwala on Feb 20, 2008 01:01 AM Permalink
SAMEER, Country is not about soil nor the land, it about people. Good or bad they left us, why think of that when your grandfather has forgot,
Let people of India not fight again saying north and south, caste and caste and regionality. I am worried that people are so regionalistic these days, every one wants a separate state.
RE:HI
by SR on Feb 19, 2008 03:35 PM Permalink
I dont think that it possible.India is finding hard to control LOC. Only a full fledged war with Pak will help us win our lost territory.I dont think that a full fledged war is possible either.
