Author's intent is not dubious at all. What all he means in a war, it is Indians who should die. Summary: Musharraf could not kill enough Indians during his tenure. Hence due to his under performance in the acts of terror, people of the Rakshas Kingdom, i.e., the Rakshasas aka pakis are angry and chose a new Rakshas king to lead the war against human beings..
So, my dear beloved people of the sacred Bharat Varsha! Be prepared for the flare up in the acts of terror against the human beings. The Rakshas are hell bent on killing human beings.
RE:Understand the real meaning of the author - Mush failed to kill sufficient number of Human beings
by Gautam De on Feb 19, 2008 02:11 AM Permalink
Yes, Mush ya PPP ya Nawaz... all are basically same corrupt. To hide their own inefficiency, they will turn to Kashmir to divert attention.
RE:RE:RE:Understand the real meaning of the author - Mush failed to kill sufficient number of Human beings
by Raja Ashok on Feb 19, 2008 02:16 AM Permalink
Well! it is not just kashmir that is on their radar. It is only their first step. After Kashmir, their other targets would be - Junagadh and Hyderabad. And their ultimate goal is to bring back the mughal evil glory. They want to enact the evil rule of Auranghzeb and create wider Pakistan that has Delhi as capital city.
RE:Understand the real meaning of the author - Mush failed to kill sufficient number of Human beings
by Gautam De on Feb 19, 2008 02:31 AM Permalink
You are overreacting buddy....a Kashmir is yet to be captured that too with hefty USD hand... and you are thinking of Hyderabad.Well, if Junagadh and Hyd goes, it would be INDIAN failure. India is yet to take a DECISIVE action to resolve kashmir issue. After all, politicians are not suffering. So who cares!
RE:Understand the real meaning of the author - Mush failed to kill sufficient number of Human beings
by blue leaf on Feb 19, 2008 12:10 PM Permalink
We should become internally strong unless until that happens...kashmir problem is going to haunt us. Army jawans raping and illeagal encounters are not helping India's cause.
Hamid Mir makes an interesting observation but unfortunately without providing more details to substantiate his statement.
He states - "Musharraf was rejected mainly due to his bad strategy in the war against terror. He killed more Pakistanis in this war than the Indians killed in the wars of 1965 and 1971. He is heading towards a very bad and painful end."
Does anybody have some real information on the casualties during the two wars and the current internal turmoil in Pakistan?
If the statement is indeed true, then Hamid Mir admits there are more terrorists in Pakistan today than those soldiers who died fighting. Aren't the Pakistani politicians, and dictators, who ruled much before Musharraf also equally responsible for the damage they caused to the Pak civil society? They encouraged hatred. They encouraged violent ways. Is it Musharraf's fault alone?
RE:How many Pakistanis did Musharraf's regime kill?
by puneet gupta on Feb 19, 2008 01:25 AM Permalink
"than the indians killed in the war" the authors tone and intent is dubious here
RE:How many Pakistanis did Musharraf's regime kill?
by Raja Ashok on Feb 19, 2008 01:46 AM Permalink
Author's intent is not dubious at all. What all he means in a war, it is Indians who should die. Summary: Musharraf could not kill enough Indians during his tenure. Hence due to his under performance in the acts of terror, people of the Rakshas Kingdom, i.e., the Rakshasas aka pakis are angry and chose a new Rakshas king to lead the war against human beings..
So, my dear beloved people of the sacred Bharat Varsha! Be prepared for the flare up in the acts of terror against the human beings. The Rakshas are hell bent on killing human beings.
RE:kick out all muslims to pakistan... lol and send the gh*ati dog raj thakrey with them. they will kill each other. lol hahahaha
by Robin Hood on Feb 19, 2008 12:57 AM Permalink
Quit day dreaming folks. Muslim influence in India is growing rapidly and it is only a matter of time before India becomes a Muslim majority country. Then where do you think you will be kicked out? The Indian ocean, I guess.. Ha ha ha
RE:kick out all muslims to pakistan... lol and send the gh*ati dog raj thakrey with them. they will kill each other. lol hahahaha
by Ch Mahender Reddy on Feb 19, 2008 01:10 AM Permalink
Mr. Gyan Vedi, Where the hell the Pak and Bangladesh came from. do u have any idea? The msulim Kins in those days kicked all Hindus to convert into islam and the reslt is Pak and Bang. Now that is continued by the converted ones.. all hundus from Pak and Bang are kicked out to India...u may not see all these deadly results in a single life time...but it matters a lot in a long run...people like u dont realise this and still support the evil for political reasons.
RE:kick out all muslims to pakistan... lol and send the gh*ati dog raj thakrey with them. they will kill each other. lol hahahaha
by Chandra Prakash on Feb 19, 2008 12:17 AM Permalink
A road side Bhikari call himself India King ! Ha Ha Ha
I am still not sure that there is so much reason for the average Indian to celebrate Musharaf's defeat. There is very firm evidence that around the time of Kargil Musharaf was a major threat to this nation with his grand daydreaming of using terrorist to put India into problems . Subsequently maybe under the pressure from his friends in the US , he sobered down in to being a good proponent of discussions as a way of solving the problem with India. Sadly by then his control over the terror cells was lost , thanks to his being seen as an 'Americian Stooge' . That possibly was the reason why he could not control the Jehadi terrorists who continued to operate vigorously in India. We as Indians have reason to dislike Mussaraf but celebrating his defeat may not be justified. The civilian Government that could succeed his one may not be any more favourably disposed towards this country . Even if that happnens in true Pakistani style the Army may be tempted to take a more hostile stand towards India. Dont forget that Nawaz Sharif was PM when Kargil happened ! Only the naive will believe that he was kept in the total dark ! ZA Bhutto , the patron saint of PPP dreamt of conquering Delhi and his pipe dream included being atop the first Patton tank that would roll into the Indian Capital. India currently has no options in Pakistan ! Any which way the results go we will need to have a hostile neighbour for a long long time. No real cause to celebrate !
RE:Is it a silver lining ?
by Chandra Prakash on Feb 18, 2008 11:32 PM Permalink
In a way it is good Mr.PKN. A hostile neighbour or two will help Indians to remain patriotic.
RE:Is it a silver lining ?
by Kant Param on Feb 19, 2008 01:44 AM Permalink
A REAL GOOD ANALYSIS OF THE STORY BY MR.PKN; ONE NEEDS TO PONDER WHETHER THE SCENARIO STATED BY HAMID MIR IS ACTUALLY TRUE!! CAN MUSARRAF LIVE WITHOUT THE OPIUM OF POWER? I SUPPOSE, HE ADOPTS SOME LAST MINUTE FOOLISH DRASTIC STRATEGY TO STILL CLING TO POWER!! TIME WILL SAY
Pervez Musharraf will unfortunately face the same fate as some former dictators like Ceausescu...i personally have no doubt that he will be tried in a court, various charges will be framed against him and he will be executed!!
I'am sure Musharraf will not be in this world at the end of 2008....
Goodbye Musharraf, those who live by the sword also die by it...your execution will prove that theory!!
RE:Musharraf will meet the same fate that Ceausescu of Romania faced!!
by Reuben on Feb 19, 2008 01:09 AM Permalink
Once he loses the election - he will take asylum in the US. His entire family is here. He is not a dumb headed moron like Saddam to stay back in a hole. He will run like a mouse....run away from pakistan
RE:good bye mush
by Mysorean on Feb 18, 2008 11:07 PM Permalink
Mush of course will seek political assylm in US but wait! the battle is not yet over! the complete results of the polls are yet to be announced. Mush can always declare emergency once again if he is going to be defeated. this one big gamble he will take. Pakis deserve people like Mush. An Islamic country will never accept democracy
