Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1262 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40   Older >   >>
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:north indians are very much india,
by on Feb 15, 2008 04:07 PM  Permalink
I mean this article writer is no less an oppurtunist.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
shame!!
by deepa tare on Feb 15, 2008 04:06 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Hi
I am a Mahrashtrian and I am ashamed by the course things have taken in the recent past. However I think majority of the maharashtrians do not feel this way,irrespective of their status in the society. In fact I was had a discussion about this with a Marathi autodriver and he said he and others like him are of the opinion that if some people want to play politics (read dirty politics)then they should do so in elections and against other parties , why drag poor people into this and deny them their daily bread and butter. Friends, this is nothing but age old practice of this and some other parties to "make their presence felt". People "employed" to take part in such violent activities are unemployed youth who would do anything for one day of free food or money.They do not understand the value of hard earned money since they havent ever "worked" for it. Hence they do not give a thought to that middle class individual's sacrifices and dreams before smashing his car. This is not new and yet we fall prey to these antics is what surprises the sane part of me.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:shame!!
by Asheesh Sinha on Feb 15, 2008 04:11 PM  Permalink
Great reply.

As soon people of India (maharashtrians and others)realizes that this is just a political stunt, the better it is for all of us. 2 majorly unknown ministers, (Abu and Raj), created a controversy, even after promising they wont take bail, gets out of court in 2 hours, and they both are heroes in their respective areas. Isnt this too easy? And in the process if some innocents get beaten, looted, killed, well.... who cares about them. The leaders got what they wanted, and its all that matters to them

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:shame!!
by sehil on Feb 15, 2008 04:31 PM  Permalink
deepa the problem is he is igniting the lesser educated , unemployed youths who feel their life will imporve automatically once they ve sided with raj. they will still remain poor even after this fiasco only raj will add some more crores to the existing wealth of 5oo crores. rajs mother in law is worried about amits exam but she has no concerns for the thousands of poor innocent people and their families. nothing will happen to raj but ultimately he has to answer that why his hands r soiled with blood of fellow indians in the biggest court of GOD.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:shame!!
by pradeep kumar on Feb 15, 2008 04:10 PM  Permalink
Well said Deepa we need more people like u so we can make India a good country....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:shame!!
by Jitesh Kumar Agrawal on Feb 15, 2008 04:13 PM  Permalink
Its truly a great to hear a maharastrian saying that....if actually you all think Raj was wrong then the next elections should be his last elections and that will send a message to all politicains that people are not a party to such cheap things and dont want their already diffcult life to make more difficult by all this crap.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
people of india unite
by a a on Feb 15, 2008 04:05 PM  Permalink 

beat up any such low life politicians... thats only way out... cheap politics..
i am sure MNS wont even get his deposit back next election..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
be indian and human (very good article )
by kishor verma on Feb 15, 2008 04:04 PM  Permalink 

Can we forget caste ,religion, language ?

human memory is short , we forget lot things
why , we are not forgetting caste , religion,state,laguage.

one india ,one state, one religion , no caste,


    Forward  |  Report abuse
What makes india
by cris on Feb 15, 2008 04:03 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

when i said Gandhi is Father of nation, a foreign frnd asked me did he find the lad like columbus found america.

How was india before moghals. if was 56 countrys from Gandhar(Afghan) to kambhoja(cambodia) were called Bharat. Where was india

It was only under the rule of moghals a near shape of india was achieved and British actually gave us this India.

Its a only a weak link which binds all the states which are different in language, culture and the looks of people too.

We haev kashmirisand Tamils is there any thing commom.

we have Gujaratis and Mizos is there any thing common.

We are actually held by a weakest link called emotional bonding called india.

Letus not try to break that weak bond, else the country will be come 56 parts again, which i know no one would like.

Lets make it clear to all politicians that we are not prepared to be a europe like india.

United we stand, seperate we fall

Jai Hind

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:What makes india
by Sameer Aneja on Feb 15, 2008 04:07 PM  Permalink
wah........ wah .......... !! excellent

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What makes india
by cris on Feb 15, 2008 04:12 PM  Permalink
China wants our Arunachal, Pak wants our Kashmir, LTTE wants Our Tamilnadu is that not enough.

Do we also need to contribute our enemys efforts by infighting.

Stop this. enough is enough lets be Indians

jai Hind

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Indian
by VIRENDRA on Feb 15, 2008 04:01 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I think its just a political stunt to get appropriate publicity and popularity before the next assembly elections. There is no real non-Maharashtrian issue. I dont think any Maharsahtrian has any problem with any other state person. No body has time and energy left at the end of the day to spare for such trivial and non-issues.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Indian
by faisal khan on Feb 15, 2008 04:07 PM  Permalink
yes its all the strategy of politicians for vote bank...but we shud not pay heed and instead of looking into these matters what is the need of the hour is to unite and help our country develop and go to even greater heights...that wud help everyone's cause...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
You toooooo!!!!!!!!!!
by Annu Philip on Feb 15, 2008 04:01 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

You are talking about indians or hindus. When you talk about Indians don't stretch on any particular community or religion. You too are doing the same. Why not its the same coin with TWO FACES.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:You toooooo!!!!!!!!!!
by viswanatha seshadri on Feb 15, 2008 05:12 PM  Permalink
When partition was mainly on the hindu-moslem divide, with all hindus from pak driven out, what is wrong in excluding only moslem infiltration and inviting only hindu refugees?
Indians can be only those committed to india, irrespective of religion. Such indian-ness cannot be given to bangla-desi infitrators coming in only to serve as votebanks for leftists, salam-vadis, babaree-laalus, paswans and gaudas with basically antinational agendas.
You should augment your christian nuetrality, betw hindu and moslem, with some real national interest also.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Alternate states betw elected govt and pres rule every 5 yrs
by viswanatha seshadri on Feb 15, 2008 03:59 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Excessive votebank-politics of state-level parties is making the people forget that they all belong to one country called India and that state govts are just conveniences for administration. Perhaps, we should have a 5yr president's rule in each state betw one admn and the next election. During this period, an a-political admn, by the best available bureaucrats of the country as 'advisors', could bring the state on to an 'indian' consciousness and also take care any special infrastructure needs of the state with additional central funding and execution, without the corrupt extractions by state level politicians of competing parties. Decisions on the formation of some cetrally administered city states could also be taken during this period.

Perhaps, president's rule in karnataka should be extended for 5 years. The padma-awardee who built the underground train system for Delhi could be put as an 'advisor' there to build the infrastructure for bangalore region properly, without political pulls on decisions. Decision on separate city-state for bangalore could also be made, in the mean time. Selfseeking politicos like the Gaudas will lose the clout by the time next election comes after 5 yrs. Some honest and economically purposeful politicians may emerge, in the mean time.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Only people of India can now save India
by Murli on Feb 15, 2008 03:57 PM  Permalink 

The kind of hate politics with lowest of its level the entire nation witnessed in Maharastra, will put every citizen on shame. Shame for manything, but more over the kind of governance and polticians they have to elect to runt hsi country.
The silence and shrewed poltics played by Maharastra government and central government, who looked for like favoring MNS and Raj Thackray, did nothing but a 2 hour drama of arrest instead of putting this guy behind bar for 3 years for antinational activities, continued violence and fleeing of migrants for past few days...this all put stamp over the suspecion that coutnry is not in the safe hands. Our government is more a political party than caretaker of India. Our opposition is more bothered for Rath yatra than national integration as most of the political parties too side with very calculated comments.
Politics is going to break tis country is now clearly evident and now its upto the public to save this country. Only they can save it from being torned apart into pieces like dogs do with a piece of meat!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
only hindus.... why ?
by Anuj on Feb 15, 2008 03:57 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

"Being an infiltrator doesn't bother anyone, but North Indians in Mumbai, mostly Hindus, have to be targeted for vote bank politics"

"mostly hindus" -this line by Tarun reveals him. It looks like it was ok with him if Christains or Muslims were being targeted.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:only hindus.... why ?
by Naveen Kumar on Feb 15, 2008 04:09 PM  Permalink
he never said he is ok with christains or muslims.
may be it is his observation that mainly hindus are targetted.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:only hindus.... why ?
by Anuj on Feb 15, 2008 03:59 PM  Permalink
he seems bothered by the fact that most are hindus. I feel he should have been more bothered that all were Indians!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:only hindus.... why ?
by Supersecualirist on Feb 15, 2008 04:11 PM  Permalink
"North Indians, mostly Hindus" - is not that the truth?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 1262 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40   Older >   >>
Write a message