RE:Other side of the coin
by Gautam Sinha on Feb 13, 2008 03:03 PM Permalink
where did u get this clause - "local population is not affected"? If this clause is true, then one cannot travel to anyplace and develop it also. Also if this was true mining would be dead industry in India as most of the mining is in tribal areas. Please do not make up clauses. Yes like you I too detest the uncivil behavior of the migrant workers.
I dont see states in other countries claiming that economics and jobs in them are entirely for local population. So maharashtrian here who say that they dont need North Indians should better claim for their own country and put Raj as its pm. Let him be a new Jinnah. If you are a part of a country, you need to learn living in it. People who put their region before the country should be ashamed of calling themselves Indian. By this logic, we are going USSR way and soon we will see India breaking up into 25 or more countries.
RE:Where in the world do you see borders between states?
by Peter Parker on Feb 13, 2008 08:36 AM Permalink
In china and in Europe, which is the closest equivalent superstate to india.
There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate. No doubt about that. Certainly these places cannot accommodate all of Bihar and UP and the question is why should they ?? Has anybody thought about this ?? It is high time that we the people of this country decide on this issue which has serious implications on all areas that affect quality of life. Raj Thakerey's protest against UP and Bihars (not all Northies as media says) is the first step in that direction. So why should Raj be blamed ?? When DMK supports LTTE why is there no concern about regionalism ?? When Akalis install the portrait of Gernail Singh Bihdrawale in Dam Dami Taksal (who wanted to break up India) why was there chilly silence among the desh Bhakts ?? When Bengalis openly rioted to protest against exclusion of Saurabh Ganguly from Indian Cricket team where were the media that cries foul against regionalism?? When Biharis were slaughtered in Assam why was media silent?? Where was all the love for biharis then ?? The truth is people from UP and Bihar have swamped the states like Delhi, Orissa, Assam, Maharashtra and Rajasthan. Wherever they go they start behaving like they are in Azamgarh or Siwan. They do not respect the culture in which they go. Raj Thakeray's fight is against those that want to convert maharahstra into azamgarh or Siwan. This fight is not for jobs or resources but to maintain local culture and avoid lawlessness of UP and bihar.
RE:RE:There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate
by Attatar Yena on Feb 13, 2008 02:40 AM Permalink
(CONTD...) Lalu and Amarshing should drown in chulu bhar pani because it is their failure that people from UP and BIhar are flocking to other states. What have they done to improve the situation in UP and Bihar?? Before commenting on what is right and wrong these leaders should get out of their AC cars and mix with common people instead of partying with bollywood celebrities. Just ask what people of Orrisa, Delhi, Assam, and Rajasthan think about people from UP and Bihar and you will know why the Raj Thakeray got so much support in Maharashtra . As for Abu Azmi, he is ISI agent and a traitor. He incited muslim mob in mumbai to riot which directly lead to death of two policemen last year. People will not forget nor forgive traitor Abu Azmi.
RE:There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate
by abcd efg on Feb 13, 2008 03:57 AM Permalink
There should be a Visa policy kind of thing like filling a form explaining why someone is going to Mumbai. If they are qualified and invited for professional work, only then should they be allowed to stay in Mumbai. This will keep Mumbai clean and qualified.
Failed PM-in-Waiting. He aspire to be PM of India, But fail to comment on their alliance Partner on Bombay violence. He and Vajpaee are kind of leaders, who will keep Moaun Varth when any crisis comes (Gujrath roits is an good example of this). What kind of leadership he could provide, when he can't comment on violence gripping Indian metro??? Though he and Vajpaee were in-charge of UP and MP in late 90's (remember Kalyan, Uma Government), what he has done for them ? Did BJP (a party of difference) bring a single Industry to UP?? Or did they provide any Tax insentives to industry in UP/MP (assuming Lalu destroyed Bihar )? Maya and Mulayam Singh Yadav are also equally responsible for current state of UP.
This is due to the present central government which can do anything for minority but waits to see Hindus figtht with each other.All about vote bank politices
