Raj who is politically novice is using the politics of regionalism to enhance its political mandate. Regional Politics is a plague for the development of India. After the BMC election Raj was sensing liquidation of this political party since he was not able to create a massive mandate for this party. He was searching for appropriate reason to galvanized regional sentiment. Uddhav thackery did a successful rallies all around the Maharashtra to expose the deplorable governance of Congree- NCP allies and he was able to secure a monumental response all around the Maharashtra.
This events lets a panic in congress and Ncp camp they draw a covetous plan wherein they had a clandestine arrangement with Raj to aggravate the Marathi sentiments by playing the politics of division.
Raj adroitly manage to exasperate the feeling among the marathi against Hindi speaking people. The politics of division resulted into pungent media campaign which in a way aided raj to raise his mandate.
So in one way the pseudo secularist congress and Ncp are felicitous and raj is delighted.
I hope the marathi understand what raj is doing he want to divide hindu's into regional identity . Raj policy is clone of Congress policy.
Raj owe apologize to all hindus. Let all hindus unite against those evil and vicious force who want to divide us on regional identity.
RE:Cunning Ghaatees!
by ShivSena on Feb 12, 2008 07:08 PM Permalink
by saying EVEN SOUTH INDIANS, you are saying that they are usually not with you. Are you saying they are not indian enough????
RE:Cunning Ghaatees!
by Zumber on Feb 12, 2008 07:13 PM Permalink
Idiot, Even I am maharashtrian and denounce the act of Raj opposing and Chat Pooja and attacks on fellow Bhaiyyas. But why are you dragging entire Marathis and Hindis in this episode?
Its you who is the biggest traitor dividing the nation on racial grounds. Its not because of Raj or MNS but people like you entire Marathis are likely to go with Raj.
Yes if North Indians go on strike, India will halt. North India is more than one state. You can't compare many state going on strike vs. one state going on strike. Its worse for India if MH goes on strike than Bihar or UP individually. Karnataka and MH going on strike is worse for India than North India going on strike. Did you get your education in north india.
RE:To Neha Singh
by VS on Feb 12, 2008 07:11 PM Permalink
i said u said to give india to ST as thy r original indians. does this is nt biased talking. here we r talking of an india where one shold get wat he deserve according to his skill set nt by region or community or tribe. if ur asking india fr ST thn wats wrong in Raj asking mumbai fr maharastra. is thr any difference.... xplain
RE:To Neha Singh
by AVV on Feb 12, 2008 07:09 PM Permalink
Raj is no against north indians,, he is only against UP and Bihar uneducated flocks of men who come to mumbai and stay in slums and snatch marathi jobs.
RE:What the heck is this?
by Zumber on Feb 12, 2008 07:08 PM Permalink
Where were you, when hundreds of Hindiwallas got killed in Guwahati and entire Assam?
WHy does Hindi take prescendence over other languages in India. MH politicians should take Hindi out of schools like in South India and we should promote Marathi. All signs in the city should only be in Marathi and in English. English only because we want to welcome those Indians who are law-abiding. By having English, we can welcome South Indians who can't speak Hindi. Hindi should be banished from MH.
RE:Hindi ???
by ShivSena on Feb 12, 2008 07:13 PM Permalink
No, because English is not indegenous to MH and India. The local languages of Denmark and Iceland survive despite everyone being able to speak English. Similarly, Marathi will survive. The problem is with people from UP and Bihar who think they don't want to integrate wherever they move because their language is "more" official than other languages of India. Why is Hindi our main language, when languages like Tamil and Sanskrit are more older than Hindi. I would rather learn Tamil anyday than Hindi.
RE:Hindi ???
by Rohit Kanwar on Feb 12, 2008 07:04 PM Permalink
But South Indians are also condemning you! You guys stand isolated and look very foolish! But you don't have intelligence to realize it!
RE:Hindi ???
by AVV on Feb 12, 2008 07:05 PM Permalink
Southindians won't let Bahiyaas in their states.. the day bhaiyaas enter south then they will do the same.
RE:Hindi ???
by ShivSena on Feb 12, 2008 07:06 PM Permalink
WHere in my article does it say South Indians are condemning or not condemning us. You are bringing in a different issue. Did you get your education in UP?
Though North India are not good in many aspect. But their contribution towards India in very significant. What Raj will tell of Good intellectuals of Nort India (IAS, Engineers, and Doctors) and Hard working labours. If people of other place have capability they will get important positions. and will not Cry like Raj Thakre. Its survival of fittest. If North Indians (Bihar , UP) will go on strike all activity of India will halt. But if Marathi will go to strike nothing much will happen. Raj Thakre is feeling insecure and his future is very dark. He should have motivated Marathi for progress. This is shame for Marathi.
Original citizen of India are Schedule Tribe Only. So Leave India to Schedule Tribe.
RE:Raj Thakre Insecure , Destructive and Anti Social
by ShivSena on Feb 12, 2008 07:04 PM Permalink
Yes if North Indians go on strike, India will halt. North India is more than one state. You can't compare many state going on strike vs. one state going on strike. Its worse for India if MH goes on strike than Bihar or UP individually. Karnataka and MH going on strike is worse for India than North India going on strike. Did you get your education in north india.
RE:RE:Raj Thakre Insecure , Destructive and Anti Social
by Neha Singh on Feb 12, 2008 07:05 PM Permalink
pls explain a bit more.I am not blaming any body. Yes its truce that North indian are a bit more manupulative that is very wrong. But violence is very bad.
RE:Raj Thakre Insecure , Destructive and Anti Social
by VS on Feb 12, 2008 07:11 PM Permalink
i said u said to give india to ST as thy r original indians. does this is nt biased talking. here we r talking of an india where one shold get wat he deserve according to his skill set nt by region or community or tribe. if ur asking india fr ST thn wats wrong in Raj asking mumbai fr maharastra. is thr any difference.... xplain
RE:Raj Thakre Insecure , Destructive and Anti Social
by ShivSena on Feb 12, 2008 07:08 PM Permalink
you have to compare apples with apples. If MH goes on strike, this would affect more to India than UP alone or Bihar alone going on strike.
RE:RE:Raj Thakre Insecure , Destructive and Anti Social
by sandip jadhav on Feb 12, 2008 08:47 PM Permalink
forget the whole Mahrashtra if Mumbai is on strike then its problem in all over India. If you are so hardworker and smart, then go in Your state and developed it. thanks Sandip Jadhav
RE:Raj Thakre Insecure , Destructive and Anti Social
by Neha Singh on Feb 12, 2008 07:02 PM Permalink
schedule tribe are correct people. they have been exploited a lot in history. They need some support.
RE:Raj Thakre Insecure , Destructive and Anti Social
by VS on Feb 12, 2008 07:01 PM Permalink
r u rite. first luk into urself. u r also biased how cn u finger point anothr wrong person. dear neha luk within nd understnd wat u said above . ths is the same thng Raj is doing . so y u blaming him if u r the same.
RE:RE:Raj Thakre Insecure , Destructive and Anti Social
by Neha Singh on Feb 12, 2008 07:04 PM Permalink
pls explain a bit more.I am not blaming any body. Yes its truce that North indian are a bit more manupulative that is very wrong. But violence is very bad.
