WHY THIS ABOO CAME HERE FOR TALKING BULSHITS. HE SHOULD BE BANNED AND PUNISHED. RAJ ONLY OBJECTED ABOO'S DIRTY POLITICS. ABOO STARTED FIRST AND WHATEVER HAPPENED WAS JUST REACTION.
RE:MAH.GOVT. SHOULD PUT BAN ON ABOO THA T HE SHOULD NOT COME TO MAHARASHTRA FOREVER
by sandeep patil on Feb 11, 2008 06:20 PM Permalink
Barobar boltos.
RE:RE:MAH.GOVT. SHOULD PUT BAN ON ABOO THA T HE SHOULD NOT COME TO MAHARASHTRA FOREVER
by Sarita Parab on Feb 11, 2008 06:19 PM Permalink
I agree with you
RE:MAH.GOVT. SHOULD PUT BAN ON ABOO THA T HE SHOULD NOT COME TO MAHARASHTRA FOREVER
by prashant upadhyay on Feb 11, 2008 06:14 PM Permalink
Really ! I heard raj speaking first against North Indians. It sounds so cheap to tell this to outsiders that we live in a country where people fight such pety issues.
Come on medival period gone.We are one big country now.
So after all samajwadi party & his muslim antinational band wagon are successful in dividing hindus in maharastra.Since loksabha elections are near.Now again the govt will on that side where muslim will tilt .Do everybody knows that Congress has recently donated Rs 400 crore worth Kohinoor textile mills land to RajThakrey Ngo. Dont you think that ..........along with samajwadi party to save muslims
RE:Hindus vote divide in Maharastra again
by Attatar Yena on Feb 12, 2008 05:26 AM Permalink
Why should Raj be blamed for fomenting regionalism ?? When DMK supports LTTE why is there no concern about regionalism ?? When Akalis install the portrait of Gernail Singh Bihdrawale in Dam Dami Taksal ( who wanted to break up India) why was there chilly silence among the desh Bhakts ?? When Bengalis openly rioted to protest against exclusion of Saurabh Ganguly from Indian Cricket team where were the those who cry foul agaist regionalism ?? The truth is people from UP and Bihar have swamped the states like Delhi, Orissa, Assam, Maharashtra and Rajasthan. Wherever they go they start behaving like they are in Azamgarh or Siwan. They do not respect the culture in which they go. Raj Thakeray's fight is against those that want to convert maharahstra into azamgarh or Siwan. This fight is not for jobs or resources but to maintain local culture and avoid lawlessness of UP and bihar. Lalu and Amarshing should take a dip in chulu bhar pani because it is their failure that people from UP and BIhar are flocking to other states. What have they done to improve the situation in UP and Bihar ?? Before commenting on what is right and wrong these leaders should get out of their AC cars and mix with common people instead of partying with bollywood celebrities . Just ask people of Orrisa, Delhi, Assam, Rajasthan about people from UP and Bihar and you will know why the Raj Thakeray got so much support. As for Abu he is ISI agent. Govt should expedite pending criminal cases against him.
Its a political drama in making...Raj Thakrey has spoken abt anti north indians in public but police is still looking for evidence to book him....These politicians and police consider us to be idiots who cannot twig thier moves...Police is giving such statements at the behest of its political boss to keep the fire simmering...Even if they are arrested they would get bail next day...Really funny...
RE:RE:Abu Amzi was also wanted in the 1993 blasts
by shadmaan on Feb 11, 2008 06:17 PM Permalink
The culprits of the 1992-93 voilence are still roaming free in my beloved country,thanks to the politicians and the reasons well known to them.Punish the culprits and show them their right place.The Srikrishna commission report is gathering dust in Mantralaya and these politicians have won 2 elections on these false promises.
RE:atlast law showed some guts
by raj singh on Feb 11, 2008 06:00 PM Permalink
don't expect any action, they will file a case against both of them that azmi might be having some 20 cases already so what if it becomes 21 and court will take around 20 years to come to a conclusion.
