RAJ THAKE HAS DONE SO MUCH DAMAGE TO THE COUNTRY'S COSMOPOLITON FABRIC, THAT HE SHOULD BE CHARGED UNDER NATIONAL SECURITY ACT, AND HIS SUPPORTERS SHOULD BE HANDLED BY PARA MILITARY FORCES AND RAPID ACTION FORCES, IF THEY CREATE CHAOS IN THE CIVILISED SOCIETY.
Raj Thackrey and his newly launched party Maharashtra Navnirman Sena is indeed a great welcome step for bringing peace in Mumbai by protesting against UP and Bihar.This action of Raj deserve appreciation and not his arrest.In case Raj is arrested the matter would go even worse. So forget arresting Raj as he is doing good and we should support wholeheartedly so that peace can again revived in Maharashtra.
There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate. No doubt about that. Certainly these places cannot accommodate all of Bihar and UP and the question is why should they ?? Has anybody thought about this ?? It is high time that we the people of this country decide on this issue which has serious implications on all areas that affect quality of life. Raj Thakerey's protest against UP and Bihars (not all Northies as media says) is the first step in that direction. So why should Raj be blamed ?? When DMK supports LTTE why is there no concern about regionalism ?? When Akalis install the portrait of Gernail Singh Bihdrawale in Dam Dami Taksal (who wanted to break up India) why was there chilly silence among the desh Bhakts ?? When Bengalis openly rioted to protest against exclusion of Saurabh Ganguly from Indian Cricket team where were the media that cries foul against regionalism?? When Biharis were slaughtered in Assam why was media silent?? Where was all the love for biharis then ?? The truth is people from UP and Bihar have swamped the states like Delhi, Orissa, Assam, Maharashtra and Rajasthan. Wherever they go they start behaving like they are in Azamgarh or Siwan. They do not respect the culture in which they go. Raj Thakeray's fight is against those that want to convert maharahstra into azamgarh or Siwan. This fight is not for jobs or resources but to maintain local culture and avoid lawlessness of UP and bihar.
RE:There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate
by Attatar Yena on Feb 13, 2008 02:28 AM Permalink
(CONTD...) Lalu and Amarshing should drown in chulu bhar pani because it is their failure that people from UP and BIhar are flocking to other states. What have they done to improve the situation in UP and Bihar?? Before commenting on what is right and wrong these leaders should get out of their AC cars and mix with common people instead of partying with bollywood celebrities. Just ask what people of Orrisa, Delhi, Assam, and Rajasthan think about people from UP and Bihar and you will know why the Raj Thakeray got so much support in Maharashtra . As for Abu Azmi, he is ISI agent and a traitor. He incited muslim mob in mumbai to riot which directly lead to death of two policemen last year. People will not forget nor forgive traitor Abu Azmi.
He is no less a terrorists .Such people can be booked under the terrorists Act and should be awarded exemplary punishments in th einterests if the unity of the country.It is time that all political parties wake up to the this danger sifgnal and eradicate this manace once for all.
Bhaiyon kyoun ladte ho... ye sab neta log ek jaise hain.. India ko hi divide kar diya & ek dusre ko ladwaa diya .. kya ye hamari samjhdaari hai... What I think is .. Its just publicity stunt by Raj thakre.. who knows him..?? but now every body knows him... & Also a special thanks to our media for treating him as a HERO .. aaj usne ye kaha ... are kehne do usko ... Media ... As an Indian I request you to please highlight only the GOOD things done in favour of nation... na ki masaala news nikaal kar apni aur netaon ki publicity lo...
RE:Is Amitabh also not a culprit????
by FORCE INDIA on Feb 12, 2008 12:13 PM Permalink
Well said. Raj Thackeray was shrewd enough to know that his statements will be highlighted if he uses the name of Bacchan.
RE:Is Amitabh also not a culprit????
by Abdulla Pathan on Feb 12, 2008 12:25 PM Permalink
Amitabh is culprit, i agree with you; This is not because of his love for his birth place.
He is culprit because he has influenced central Government for CBI inquiry into Raj criminal case in '90s.
How would we forget Ramesh Kini and his terrible death.
It seems that law is only for common man in india and if have wealth, connection and influance then law will be ur servant in home.
RE:Is Amitabh also not a culprit????
by FORCE INDIA on Feb 12, 2008 12:07 PM Permalink
Boss, why are u singing Raj Thackeray's tunes. He was appointed as Brand Ambassador by UP Govt and he did it. Why didnt Maharashtra Govt. appoint him ? And by the way what has Raj Thackeray done to question someone else ? When Jaya Bacchan said if Raj gives land then they will build a school and even here if u observe the crook Raj wanted Market Price for his land. He wants everyone else to do charity and only he should make money (by legal & illegal means)
Is this growth? If Maharashtra can be this imagine UP and Bihar. Dispite of which all keep on saying India is great . we cant provide basic facilities to people and we say India is shining. Read TOI today
PUNE: As many as 81.8 per cent rural households in Maharashtra and 41.9 per cent urban households do not have toilets. As many as 39.2 per cent households have no drainage lines, 21.5 per cent use kerosene lamps in the absence of electricity and 46.6 per cent use firewood for cooking. But in all this, 24.7 per cent rural households and 70.5 per cent urban households own television sets!
Also, 35 per cent households have radios or transistors, 14.1 per cent have telephones, 30.1 per cent own bicycles, 13.2 per cent own scooters, motorcycles or mopeds, 3.4 per cent own cars, jeeps or vans and 36.8 per cent own none of the specified assets.
The figures have been revealed in the housing census conducted in June 2000, which studied houses, household amenities and assets. However, though the study was conducted in 2000, even today, a city like Pune has just 352 public urinals for a 30-lakh population.
S.S. Hiremath, deputy director, directorate of census operations, Mumbai, told TOI that the housing census was conducted for the first time during the Census 2001 exercise to determine the quality of life of people. "This study is not only useful for planners and policy-makers in the central and state governments, but also for administrators and planners at the loc
RE:Why Indians are proud of the country ? India shining
by Abdulla Pathan on Feb 12, 2008 12:41 PM Permalink
We are proud indian because we love belong to India.
Our grand parents had dreamed about India as great nation
Our politician and leader made it hell.
India will be healthy when each indian has food, drinking water and atleast one person from home has employement.
At present, about 25 - 20% people under poovery ( official), in reality this figure is too high as per my understanding it is about 35 to 45 %.
Many part of nation, people have to eat roti made up of grass, girls are sold cheaper than goats or cow. Please celebrate when they get meat of fox or any wild animals.
They are ready to sell thier human part for 10-20 thousand rupees...
I would request our friends staying in cities, please see true india.. dear friends you do not have to travel too long... you will see it in 200-300 km area of your living place ( across nation)
the inaction aganist raj or any other politician having some following is sending wrong signals to law abiding citizens.it shows the cowardness of govts. at centre and stateto tackle any powerful person, breaking law of land.if any ordinary citizen voilates law the autharities immiedetly pounce on him/her. it also shows the impotency ofofficers looking after law and order. what made them to wait for orders from political bosses when any person voilates law of the land. it is nothing but brinkmenshi p on part of our ips and ias officers who have become boot lickers of politicians.
