Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1124 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
Raj Thakrey
by arungopal agarwal on Feb 08, 2008 05:12 PM  Permalink 

Our politics is based on vote bank not on national interests.Taking law in their hands has become a fashion with few political parties, as all such expenses are paid by tax payers, these parties are not accountable for any destruction or indiscipline.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mumbai
by Rajamani on Feb 08, 2008 05:10 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Each & every one says that India is one country & citizens has got right to stay or work any where in India. In that case why kashmir is not governed by this rule ? Let the Govt of UP, Bihar, and other northern states ask their people to go & stay and kashmir, this will easily solve the militancy problem there. Also give weapons to those who are going to kashmir to protect themselves from the militants. The present congress govt has no guts to do this. Or the Lalu's, Mulayam's or the commies will never show guts to fight terror with terror. Wake up Indians. Jai Hind

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Mumbai
by Siddhesh Sabnis on Feb 08, 2008 05:14 PM  Permalink
Jisko jahan jaana hai jaao, jisko jidhar aana hai aao. Kyon apna khoon jalao, yeh politics ka khel hai pyaare, kyon dimaag ko takleef main lao.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Mumbai
by Vinayak Gadekar on Feb 08, 2008 07:09 PM  Permalink
Rajamani, go and learn history.

Kashmir is different from rest of the states because it was never an Indian state at 1947. Pak first marched into Kashmir, then India reacted in the same way. Both have stayed at the LoC for 60 years. So both are aggressors in Kashmir.

At least India is slightly fair and benevolent. It has accorded a special status (Article 370) to Indian-administered Kashmir.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Mumbai
by deepak shukla on Feb 08, 2008 05:16 PM  Permalink
u r pefectly right,Mr.Rajamani.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Mumbai
by jayesh on Feb 08, 2008 05:11 PM  Permalink
YOUR ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Mumbai
by me mumbaikar on Feb 08, 2008 05:18 PM  Permalink
Rajamani well said man....three cheers for u...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Mumbai
by Harish Manwani on Feb 08, 2008 05:28 PM  Permalink
The me-mumbaikar champions forget one thing - that Mumbai has become what it is today mostly due to its good fortune in being located bang in the middle of the country, being a natural port, and because the British settled there early. It's got very little to do with which state it is in. Mumbai's prime location attracted talent from all over the country, which automoatically made it a cosmopolitan city, with a strongly grounded migrant work ethic. The rest is history. Maharashtra claiming itself to be the sole reason for Mumbau's prosperity and claiming first ownership of Mumbai is really ridiculous, considering the big part so-called 'outsiders' have played in making the city what it is today! If non-maharashtrains leave Mumbai, it will cease being India's vibrant commercial capital and become just another small town.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Mumbai
by Vinayak Gadekar on Feb 08, 2008 07:13 PM  Permalink
So the great Mr Harish Manwani, why don't you pack up and leave Mumbai ? In fact that is what Raj is saying.

All of you, pack and go to your respective regions. That will either take you to Gujarat or Sindh in Pakistan. Your choice !!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Mumbai
by nandu on Feb 08, 2008 06:17 PM  Permalink
why not other city. any city to prosper it nedds only godd law & order. everything follows. bihar & UP have good soil, mineral, water but u know the status why?
this is an achivement of maharashtra & marthi manoos

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Mumbai
by earthy man on Feb 08, 2008 05:13 PM  Permalink
madam,
UNO will stop india from doing so. Do not be dump stupit. The security council will put india to task. Understand international rules.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
why mumbai developed
by jatin on Feb 08, 2008 05:10 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Why Mumbai became financial capital or entertainment insdustry ??

it became entertainment capital because Maharastrain made the first film of india..Mr Dadasaheb Phalke... secondly ..any place developed because of its social fabric and local skills and culture of native people ... maharastra was front runner in aboloshing social evils like child marraige ,start girls education ,untouchability (ambedkar is maharastrian) ... thats why mumbai developed ...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:why mumbai developed
by pk k on Feb 08, 2008 05:25 PM  Permalink
mazya maharashtriya bandhuno- Let us understand ousting N Indians cannot be the only solution. we should understand that we need to go much deeper to solve this issue.
They r able to come here in large no.s bcos the railway minister(usually from Bihar /UP mostly) makes arrangement for them by starting 5 new trains in every Rail budget. This needs to be stopped. Once they come here they r able to settle here bcos of the slums developed mostly on Collector land( indirectly under State Govt which is/was Congress party & ruled by North Indians at the top). All this is again possible bcoz majority of Central Govt posts are held by N. Indians(UP&BIharis) so we should strive to get more & more of Mah in these posts right from Minister to the clerks only then we can retain our hold on these issues in the Central Govt also.. we should ensure all our local bodies -Municipal corporations & ZPs,Nagar parishads, Gram panchayats etc make rules which require them to adopt to our language , culture etc.
We should reduce our tolerance for these people in every possible way.We should convince our state bureaucracy also to adopt a no tolerance policy towards these people , officially or non officially.
At individual level let us start by not doing any business with these people from today in Mumbai/Pune or Nagpur or Kolhapur or nasik or aurangabad....everywhere in Maharashtra. For this Maharashtrians should be easily identifiable whereever & everywhere. We should give priority to s

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:why mumbai developed
by swati vish on Feb 08, 2008 05:25 PM  Permalink
Again, get ur facts right.
Mumbai was just a fisherman's town...worse than Madras and Kolkatta. Britishers layed their foundation.
Mumbai's shape is such ki, use develop hi nahin karna that. SO everyone....Blame Britishers for Mumbai's mess.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:why mumbai developed
by Ajay Deshpande! on Feb 08, 2008 05:23 PM  Permalink
Who started education for ladies - Mahatma Phule
Who started education for widows - DK Karve
Who started Family Planning in INdia - RD Karve
Who fought for the rights of Dalits - BR Ambedkar
Who founded RSS - K B Hedgewar
Nightingle of India - Lata Mangeskar
Who gave the first taste of Freedom - Chatrapati Shivaji
Who Laid the Freedom Struggle Lokmanya Tilak, Who fought against Britisher in 1857 Rani Laxmibai (Surname Tambe)
Who was the first Indian Governer of RBI- CD Deshmukh
Who was the first speaker of Loksabha - Malvankar
Who was the first and who is the current superstar of Indian Cricket - Sunil Gavaskar and Sachin Tendulkar.
Who was the First Crorepati ( Kaun Banega Crorepati) - Harshavardhan Nawathe
Who was the first Indian Idol - Abhijeet Sawant
Who was the winner of the first Nach Baliye Contest- Sachin and Supriya Pilgaonkar
Why the freedom movement was its peak in Maharashtra. Why Mahatma Gandhi preferred Mumbai for Quit India Movement?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:why mumbai developed
by your name on Feb 08, 2008 05:33 PM  Permalink
where Md. jinna was born ???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:why mumbai developed
by swati vish on Feb 08, 2008 05:26 PM  Permalink
so? wats ur point?
Indian Idol aur Nach Baliye jaise phatichar competition se Mumbai ke development ka kya talluk??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:why mumbai developed
by nandu on Feb 08, 2008 06:20 PM  Permalink
swati canu move alone in UP Bihar Delhi at night or evening. Now u can not tarvel in Mumbai sububs also dominated by North Indians

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:why mumbai developed
by Sandy on Feb 08, 2008 05:13 PM  Permalink
Mahatma amd savitri bai phule,
and great shivaji.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:why mumbai developed
by jayesh on Feb 08, 2008 05:17 PM  Permalink
jai hind jai maharashtra

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:why mumbai developed
by jatin on Feb 08, 2008 05:21 PM  Permalink
sandy and jayesh ..list of social reformer and heros in maharastra is so big that most of our critics will be ashamed of thenself and thier respective region

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:why mumbai developed
by Vishal Jadhav on Feb 08, 2008 05:28 PM  Permalink
At last, a sane and sensible view. :)

Moreover, the real problem is not migrants who come and work honestly, but the trouble-makers (read Amar Singh, Kripashankar Singh, Abu Azmi, Sanjay Nirupam and their ilk) who are into politics and resort to cheap gimmicks themselves.

Who the F is Abu Azmi to distribute lathis in Mumbai???!!!! What have SP, BSP have done in their own home states???...Just by geeting her "elephant" in Mumbai does not mean she rules the jungle!!...It is well-known who is the king of the jungle.

Aur yeh corrupt log apna desh bachayenge????...what a laugh!!!!!!!!

If all other states would have had a social fabric like Maharashtra, there would have been one Mumbai in each state!!!...unfortunately, people feel that they have the right to milk only one cow!!!....they cant or do not want to develop their own backyards!!!!

And Maharashtrians do not have to migrate to survive...it seems that Maharashtrians are paying a price for being prosperous and socially way ahead of others.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Thakre disease- no cure
by Desert Rose on Feb 08, 2008 05:11 PM  Permalink
very true...thats y marathies r being mad

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:right facts
by jayesh on Feb 08, 2008 05:22 PM  Permalink
stupid mans stupid thinking, pls tel me your correct information like name and adddress

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:right facts
by Desert Rose on Feb 08, 2008 05:13 PM  Permalink
i have seen man...u train comes into maharashtra......in every stop u wud be finding more begger then sellers....but i really feel bad for them

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:right facts
by Deep Ghosh on Feb 08, 2008 05:12 PM  Permalink
Desert Rose........You know what is right of freedom......?????first clear what it is then comment here........freedom is for person......not about group of persons....understand this.........


   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
why mumbai developed ??
by jatin on Feb 08, 2008 05:08 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Why Mumbai became financial capital or entertainment insdustry ??

it became entertainment capital because Maharastrain made the first film of india..Mr Dadasaheb Phalke... secondly ..any place developed because of its social fabric and local skills and culture of native people ... maharastra was front runner in aboloshing social evils like child marraige ,start girls education ,untouchability (ambedkar is maharastrian) ... thats why mumbai developed ...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:why mumbai developed ??
by shekhar galande on Feb 08, 2008 05:12 PM  Permalink
Well Said....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sau Chuhe Khake BIlli Haj ko chali??
by Indian on Feb 08, 2008 05:08 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Raj is doing exactly what Sr Thackrey had done years ago...Then it was Marathi Manoos Vs South Indians, Now it is North Indians..
Has Mr Thackrey forgotten "Pungi bajo, Lungi Bhagao"???


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Sau Chuhe Khake BIlli Haj ko chali??
by Chandra Prakash on Feb 08, 2008 05:16 PM  Permalink
You mean to say these Thakereys have guts to take on entire India , Mr. Indian ?
In that case we can motivate them and send to Pakistani and Chinese border !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
fssad
by Praveen on Feb 08, 2008 05:06 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

ppl forget that it was the same bal thackrey who drove the south indians fm maharastar to gain polictical image during his prime age. hw can he call raj chicken. this thackrey fly doesnt know that if not for south indians & north indians mumbai wud not have been global map. maharastrian are famous only for selling fish so let them do thier business & let ppl fm other states do sum developed works for ind & mum

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:fssad
by Mangesh Vedpathak on Feb 08, 2008 05:12 PM  Permalink
why dont u get lost to yr states and develop them and bring them on the global map... we dont need yr help and never asked for it... its u who come as beggers to us... maratha empire has been the most powerful empire in india ... we are capable of being on the global map and much more... so please keep yr sick ideas to yrself and get lost out of maharashtra the great state...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:fssad
by inox quinox on Feb 08, 2008 05:20 PM  Permalink
what fish did u not catch that makes you so rotten madam?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:fssad
by Vishal Jadhav on Feb 08, 2008 05:29 PM  Permalink
Aye Mallu...Gelf ze tumako baar nigal diye gya?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:fssad
by Sandy on Feb 08, 2008 05:08 PM  Permalink
Are yar pyass, Mango, orange, graps khata hai na

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:fssad
by swati vish on Feb 08, 2008 05:08 PM  Permalink
He himself wd have called himself a chicken....but Bird flu dint exist back then.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hindu Terrorists
by Zinisys Zinisys on Feb 08, 2008 05:06 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

These all are Hindu terrorists that terrifies Innocent Indians.
They shud be kicked off from India

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Hindu Terrorists
by Madhu chandrapp on Feb 08, 2008 05:10 PM  Permalink
What about you????????


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Hindu Terrorists
by Chandra Prakash on Feb 08, 2008 05:18 PM  Permalink
I will help you to push them to......

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Hindu Terrorists
by Chandra Prakash on Feb 08, 2008 05:10 PM  Permalink
Send them to Sri Lanka, LTTE knows how to utilise them properly.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 1124 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20   Older >   >>
Write a message