If raj thakeray wants only marathi in maharashtra, let us throw out all the computers running the state which don't use marathi, have no marathi software, are usually imported from China / Korea / Malaysia / Thailand based on electronic principles built by mostly western scientists and researchers not speaking marathi.
RE:Hmm..
by Attatar Yena on Feb 05, 2008 05:51 AM Permalink
Biharis and UP Bhaiyyas have no place to be in Maharashtra. They are a burden on the already stretched amenities in Mumbai and other cities. It is high time Mahrashtra and Gujarat get autonomy so that outsiders do not grab the rights of son of soil. Or it wont be long before situation looks similar to what we have in Assam and North East ( thanks to the influx of Bangalis there). Bhaiyya Lokaana Heploon Kadhha !!
Please don't see a fellow indian being beaten/abused anywhere, gather in a group and oppose this.Otherwise It could be you , the place may change !!! It could be a marathi in delhi/up/bihar/haryana/punjab etc. the next time.
It's really silly of this raj thakeray, spoiling the name of balasaheb.
In this age of internet, you can actually contribute to your chosen language sitting anywhree in the world. you can write, make songs, films, etc. anywhere in the world. You don't really need LAND to support a language. This is the biggest fallacy in linguistic states. Also, the belief that linguistic states help preserve the culture/language is frivolous. 1. If your language is so great, it should not be dependent on state grants and the like to preserve it. 2. The intermixing of language with culture is frivolous. The culture in all parts of India, thankfully, is the same and based on Hindu values and conscience. The same is represented in over thousands of languages that India has. Geographically, language changes every 200 kms. The marathi of Pune is different from Nagpur's. So, what is the point of drawing boundaries on the basis of changing entities like language.
RE:Raj Thackrey Zindabaad !
by Rajeev on Feb 05, 2008 12:48 AM Permalink
Either it is North Indian or marathi, all are same. Please do not try to divide Hindus any more. Hindus are already divided on many things. marathis as well as north Indian all are good. This is raj Thakrey bad not Marathi.
maratha Shivaji Maharaj bravely fought against Mughals and Biharis bravely fought and defeated Alexender under Great leadership of Chanakya Pandit.
Shiv sena know what kind of harm they did themself for the statement against North Indian. Shiv Sena is still struggling to come to power, b'z all north Indian started voting Congress. Raj will also realize what mistake he is doing after sometime.
RE:Is mumbai a biggest racist city in india...
by Arun karthick on Feb 05, 2008 12:51 AM Permalink
Chennai..no way.. I am here for may years,i have never seen such things. we never treat any fellow humans as third class citiznes as how these marathis are doing now...
But no idea abt kolkatha..
But still mumbai holds an apt name of hoisting a cricket match where more than 50000 racists watched the match.I mean the match played in wanhadhe stadium against aus ..
RE:Is mumbai a biggest racist city in india...
by on on Feb 05, 2008 12:55 AM Permalink
hahaha what a joke just see an outsider get down at railway station of chennai...coolies fight with him auto drivers try to loot him..if a street guy sees someone talking in hindi and asking for directions he turns the other way round...
RE:Is mumbai a biggest racist city in india...
by on on Feb 05, 2008 01:02 AM Permalink
is this same state where cousins burn each other's offices for political reasons? if u speak against dravidian politics u get ur office ransacked? is this same state where there is covert support for terrorists across the border? is this same state where all brahmins are treated as second class citizens?
RE:Is mumbai a biggest racist city in india...
by daimavane on Feb 05, 2008 01:00 AM Permalink
LOL! Chennai is the only city where nobody has EVER been targeted by race, religion or language. Tamilians are proud of their language but in noway they target folks from other states. Give me one instance to prove it otherwise. you;re a dump A$$ from karnataka for sure.
RE:Is mumbai a biggest racist city in india...
by Kaushik Das on Feb 05, 2008 12:55 AM Permalink
abe o golden, if you are so concerned about bihari migration, what were you doing voting for congress when congress was supporting the minority lallu govt in bihar which destroyed all growth opportunities in the state?
RE:RE:Is mumbai a biggest racist city in india...
by on on Feb 05, 2008 01:03 AM Permalink
golden i have seen u support congress in rediff forums...anmd lot of ppl labelled u muslim..are u a muslim trying to divide hindus? speak truth.
Despite people from maharastra and south indian making noises about their regions. All of you should remember north indians dominate indian politics in parliament , most of the ias officers are north indians and most important the vast majority in the armed forces are north indians. When push comes to shove you will see what happens and will not be able to do anything about it
RE:north indians will always dominate
by Prashant Mhatre on Feb 05, 2008 03:37 AM Permalink
dont think about others are u ias ,ips. start education & industry in up, mp, bihar. people will got job there. & all problems will solve.
Raj Thackeray is not entirely wrong when he says, Bihari are notorious for in-descent public behaviour. Isn't it truth ? U watch people from bihar, UP and will find. 1, They r always looking for short cuts, Bribe to get things done. 2, Not caring about others feelings, environment. They are wild, no manners. 3, Too much involved in gossiping & politics. Dont realise that Mumbai has progressed because educated people working together in pvt companies and behaving descently with each other. Nitish kumar should focus on these points than just attacking Raj Thakaray. Yes, Thackeray fault is also that, they have turned mumbai, where marathi has strong union and thats why mumbai has not progressed like Dubai, singapoor. Thackaray are primarily responsible for the dirt and mumbai looking like fish market.
RE:RAJ Thackaray is Right and wrong.
by Kaushik Das on Feb 05, 2008 01:04 AM Permalink
Mr bhagwat, when was mumbai not a fish market??? of all the places, mumbai has least grown due to marathis.
By the way, bihari babu, I am also form bihar, currently in delhi and I partly agree with you and partly disagree. partly agree as i can see the bad public behaviour of growing number of biharis in delhi and am ashamed of it.
However, delhi was not really a great public behaviour place any time in the recent past. punjabis and haryanwis are hardly known for good behaviour. Probably, a few UPites (not all) and HPites are the only ones who have good behaviour here.
So, i think biharis are just taking advantage of the bad system and nothing else. and just like mumbai, delhi is also guilty of sitting idle when laloo was looting the state. These buggers even voted congress to power - the same congress which was supporting laloo's misrule. Now, when biharis are migrating, these buggers are complaining. But they forget that the same biharis are also keeping the living costs low with human services. However, the land pressure is increased. So, it's a mixed bag.
RE:RAJ Thackaray is Right and wrong.
by Prashant Mhatre on Feb 05, 2008 03:40 AM Permalink
mr das what r u doing in delhi. go to bihar & create work opportunity in bihar.bolne se kam nahi chalega. kuch karake dikhana hoga
