1. 52% of all temple staff including pujaris should be from OBC communities. 2. 29% temple staff including pujaris should be from Dalits and Tribals. 3. Remaining all temple staff including pujaris should be from other castes.
Also render PUJAS in regional or local language instead of sanskrit.
Abu Azmi is ISI agent and a traitor. Police commissioner of Mumbai in 1997 had filed an affidavit against Samajwadi Party's Maharashtra state president Abu Asim Azmi, saying he was working for Dawood Ibrahim. Last year, he incited muslim mob in mumbai to riot which directly lead to death of two policemen.. People will not forget nor forgive traitor Abu Azmi
RE:Abu Azmi is an ISI agent
by khursheed ahmad on Feb 15, 2008 10:53 AM Permalink
Supreme Court has cleared all the charges against Abu Azmi. Are you above Supreme Court? Can you tell me when will Shri Krishna Report be implemented? All of you are terrorist.
There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate. No doubt about that. Certainly these places cannot accommodate all of Bihar and UP and the question is why should they ?? Has anybody thought about this ?? It is high time that we the people of this country decide on this issue which has serious implications on all areas that affect quality of life. Raj Thakerey's protest against UP and Bihars (not all Northies as media says) is the first step in that direction. So why should Raj be blamed ?? When DMK supports LTTE why is there no concern about regionalism ?? When Akalis install the portrait of Gernail Singh Bihdrawale in Dam Dami Taksal (who wanted to break up India) why was there chilly silence among the desh Bhakts ?? When Bengalis openly rioted to protest against exclusion of Saurabh Ganguly from Indian Cricket team where were the media that cries foul against regionalism?? When Biharis were slaughtered in Assam why was media silent?? Where was all the love for biharis then ?? The truth is people from UP and Bihar have swamped the states like Delhi, Orissa, Assam, Maharashtra and Rajasthan. Wherever they go they start behaving like they are in Azamgarh or Siwan. They do not respect the culture in which they go. Raj Thakeray's fight is against those that want to convert maharahstra into azamgarh or Siwan. This fight is not for jobs or resources but to maintain local culture and avoid lawlessness of UP and bihar.
RE:There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate
by israel ali on Mar 27, 2008 03:53 PM Permalink
I, think the author of this note has no or very rare knowledge of Constitution of India. The Author should know the word "UNION" of our Constitution. If this unification and adhering under one flag had not happened then there would had been 30 Countries instead of 30 States. It is because of this one is freely roaming any where in our beloved country and its is not like USA where if one has to go other State, the person has to first seek permission or have to initimate the authorities and many more. Yes, many people mainly corrupt politician's or narrow minded people are misusing the rights provided by our country's Constitution. It is not that Bihari's or any other citizen of India are just got settled in Maharashtra and people of Maharashtra's are feeding thme at their doorstep free of cost. If the so called people of Maharastra would have been capable of meeting human resources then certainly Maharastrian would have not employed the North Indians or Foreigners. The author should also keep in mind for the development of Mumbai or Maharastra there is no specific role of Maharastrian, it is only the benaglies, south Indians and North Indians. The author is talking about the slaughter or killings of biharis at Assam, Punjab, Orissa or other eastern state, but have not understood the people who have killed them. I think if the author is equating with those killers in that event author and its supporters on the note should be treated at par of those killers and not as ordinary c
RE:There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate
by on Apr 09, 2008 11:12 PM Permalink
BEFOR WRITING ANY THING FIRST CHECK THE FACT RIGHT FOR UR SAYING THAT DMK SUPPORTS LTTE ITSELF IS WRONG.FIRST LTTE WAS GIVEN SUPPORT BY THEN CHIEF MINISTER OF TN MGR AT THE TIME OF INDIRA GANDHI PERIOD AND ALL PARTY WERE SUPPORTING THAT TIME.AFTER THE DEATH OF RAJIV GANDHI THE BLAME WAS PUT ON DMK,NOT A SINGLE DMK PARTYMEN IS ACCUSED IN THAT CASE WHICH WAS DEALT BY CBI.I RESPECT MNS SUPPORT FOR MAHARASTRIANS BUT NOT AT THE COST OF COUNTRIES UNITY.IF SUCH DEMAND COME FROM ALL PEOPLE FROM ALL STATES THE WE WILL GO RUSSIAN WAY OF STATES BECOMING COUNTRIES.WHO SAY IF MILK,LAUNDRY,VEGETABLE,AUTOS,TAXI,CONSTRUCTION WORKER,WATCHMAN,PANIPURI BHEL PURI, AND LOT OF OTHER THINGS SOLD OR DONE BY MAHARASTRIAN WONT BE ACCEPTED? FIRST START DOING BUSINESS THEN U WILL COME TO KNOW THE PAINS AND THE DIFFICULTY OF DOING IT.CAN MNS SAY IF BUSINESS DONE BY MAHARASTRIAN SHOULD NOT BE SOLD TO OTHER THAN MAHARASTRIAN?
RE:There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate
by Attatar Yena on Feb 14, 2008 05:43 AM Permalink
(CONTD%u2026) Lalu and Amarshing should drown in chulu bhar pani because it is their failure that people from UP and BIhar are flocking to other states. What have they done to improve the situation in UP and Bihar?? Before commenting on what is right and wrong these leaders should get out of their AC cars and mix with common people instead of partying with bollywood celebrities. Just ask what people of Orrisa, Delhi, Assam, and Rajasthan think about people from UP and Bihar and you will know why the Raj Thakeray got so much support in Maharashtra
Did anyone notice. Raj Thakrey's ADVOCATE who spoke to the press was a NORTHERNER. Some guy called MISHRA !!
Does anyone know the fact that IN A BHAYYA or BIHARI FAMILY - ONE BROTHER STAYS WITH HIS FATHER TO TAKE CARE of the FARMING while THE OTHER GOES TO THE CITIES to FURTHER SUPPORT. Its not just Mumbai that they go to, but other cities like Delhi and Calcutta. Where else do you see such familial co-operation. I have travelled much and personally witnessesd the higher ratio of break up of families in other communities.
Besides one cannot blame the GANGA BELT for being OVER-POPULATED. HISTORICALLY our NATION has its BEGINNINGS there. Excepting the far south, the ENTIRE SUB-CONTINENT has been populated by migrations from this HEARTLAND.
Even the MARATHI LANGUAGE is a derivate of SANSKRIT as other Indian languages and proudly one amongst very few to use the DEVNAGIRI SCRIPT. The MARATHI MANUUS are actully raising hands on their own heritage.
WHY THE HELL did SHIV SENA go all the way to AYODHYA, ARM in ARM with the NORTHERNERS to destroy the BABRI MASJID.
SHARAD PAWAR is the MINISTER for AGRICULTIRE. and Maharashtra has had 25% of India's FARMER SUICIDES. He has partnered with Raj Thackrey in certain corporations. SHARAD PAWAR should be the FIRST MAN TO BE DRIVEN OUT OF MUMBAI for NOT CHECKING RAJ's moves inspite of being SUCH A SENIOR POLITICIAN.
MUMBAI has a POPULATION and NATIONAL IMPORTANCE like DELHI. ITS ABOUT TIME IT SEPARATED FROM MAHARASHTRA AND MADE
RE:RE:GROSSLY OVERLOOKED
by Attatar Yena on Feb 14, 2008 05:46 AM Permalink
Seperate Mumbai from Maharashtra ?? Come and say that in mumbai.. you are most welcome..
There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate. No doubt about that. Certainly these places cannot accommodate all of Bihar and UP and the question is why should they ?? Has anybody thought about this ?? It is high time that we the people of this country decide on this issue which has serious implications on all areas that affect quality of life. Raj Thakerey's protest against UP and Bihars (not all Northies as media says) is the first step in that direction. So why should Raj be blamed ?? When DMK supports LTTE why is there no concern about regionalism ?? When Akalis install the portrait of Gernail Singh Bihdrawale in Dam Dami Taksal (who wanted to break up India) why was there chilly silence among the desh Bhakts ?? When Bengalis openly rioted to protest against exclusion of Saurabh Ganguly from Indian Cricket team where were the media that cries foul against regionalism?? When Biharis were slaughtered in Assam why was media silent?? Where was all the love for biharis then ?? The truth is people from UP and Bihar have swamped the states like Delhi, Orissa, Assam, Maharashtra and Rajasthan. Wherever they go they start behaving like they are in Azamgarh or Siwan. They do not respect the culture in which they go. Raj Thakeray's fight is against those that want to convert maharahstra into azamgarh or Siwan. This fight is not for jobs or resources but to maintain local culture and avoid lawlessness of UP and bihar.
RE:There is a limit to how many people Mumbai or Maharashtra can accommodate
by Attatar Yena on Feb 12, 2008 11:56 PM Permalink
(CONTD...) Lalu and Amarshing should drown in chulu bhar pani because it is their failure that people from UP and BIhar are flocking to other states. What have they done to improve the situation in UP and Bihar?? Before commenting on what is right and wrong these leaders should get out of their AC cars and mix with common people instead of partying with bollywood celebrities. Just ask what people of Orrisa, Delhi, Assam, and Rajasthan think about people from UP and Bihar and you will know why the Raj Thakeray got so much support in Maharashtra . As for Abu Azmi, he is ISI agent and a traitor. He incited muslim mob in mumbai to riot which directly lead to death of two policemen last year. People will not forget nor forgive traitor Abu Azmi.
These people are just a nuisance not at all contributed to the country. These people want to drive Maharastrians from their motherland. They might have tasted the effect of just thinking about the it. What will be the consequences of the reality. Just imagine. Maharashtrians are people who have contributed to development of the city and not demolition. These bloody politicians especially mentioned above are nothing but bloody scoundrels.
Dare to think and see the consequences they will find in the city. Now MNS has agitated but if the minds of maharashtrians are disturbed then see the collective effort as Sena will also join hands not with MNS but to save the MARATHI Manus.
Why should Raj be blamed for fomenting regionalism ?? When DMK supports LTTE why is there no concern about regionalism ?? When Akalis install the portrait of Gernail Singh Bihdrawale in Dam Dami Taksal ( who wanted to break up India) why was there chilly silence among the desh Bhakts ?? When Bengalis openly rioted to protest against exclusion of Saurabh Ganguly from Indian Cricket team where were the those who cry foul agaist regionalism ?? The truth is people from UP and Bihar have swamped the states like Delhi, Orissa, Assam, Maharashtra and Rajasthan. Wherever they go they start behaving like they are in Azamgarh or Siwan. They do not respect the culture in which they go. Raj Thakeray's fight is against those that want to convert maharahstra into azamgarh or Siwan. This fight is not for jobs or resources but to maintain local culture and avoid lawlessness of UP and bihar. Lalu and Amarshing should take a dip in chulu bhar pani because it is their failure that people from UP and BIhar are flocking to other states. What have they done to improve the situation in UP and Bihar ?? Before commenting on what is right and wrong these leaders should get out of their AC cars and mix with common people instead of partying with bollywood celebrities . Just ask people of Orrisa, Delhi, Assam, Rajasthan about people from UP and Bihar and you will know why the Raj Thakeray got so much support. As for Abu he is ISI agent. Govt should expedite pending criminal cases against him.
RE:Why blame Raj only ??
by on Mar 24, 2008 06:39 PM Permalink
While it is true that the actions of the DMK and the Akalis must be strongly condemned - surely two wrongs dont make a right. The truth of the matter is that every state of the union has a role to play and should be recognised as such.I feel as a nation we are only too willing and naive to let unscruplous politicians like Raj Thackeray, Karunanidhi and the Akalis to fragment and divide us at a time when the world has started treating us with the respect that we deserve. If we subscribe to these views why not break up the country into tiny fragments,why create a facade of nationalism- let the country go to the dogs and too hell with nationalism and national pride. The result will be a fragmented country with no international stature, no development and again open to colonisation. Is that the heaven of Freedom Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore wanted our country to wake up in, is that what Bapu had in mind, is that what countless other leaders and great souls thought when they made the ultimate sacrifice? It is time when every Indian of all denominations and faiths stand up to and expose the Rajs and Akalis of this world - Let us once and for all consign these people to the place where they belong - the dustbin of infamy!!!!.
PS: I have always regarded Shivaji as a national hero and indeed have taught my children as such - I wonder who has given Raj the right to hijack a great soul like Shivaji for his own petty political ends!!! JAI HIND A PROUD INDIAN RAMESH SABBERWAL
RE:Why blame Raj only ??
by on Apr 09, 2008 11:18 PM Permalink
WHY SHOULD BE DMK CONDEMNED ?WHAT U KNOW ABOUT DMK AND TAMILNADU .EVERY CITIZEN HAS A RIGHT TO VOICE ITS CONCERN LIKE U HAVE, IT IS EASY IN LIFE TO GIVE ADIVCE AND CRITISE OTHERS LIKE U DO,CAN I KNOW WHAT U DONE FOR THE COUNTRY.
The whole issue was instigated by Samajwadi Party leader Abu Azmi. His statment that he wants to have Hindi mandatory in Mumbai BMC and that they will use force and drive away marathis from the BMC. He also made inflammatory statements about using lathis. Mumbai is a capital of Maharastra and its official language is Marathi.These kinda statments from a party which does not exist in Maharastra is uncalled for. It would definately upset the local population and political parties, imagine marathis gathering in a lucknow rally and making speeches to throw these bhayyas , biharis from rulling their state and making use of marathi mandatory in lucknow govt offices. Ask these parties to make a statement in kolkatta, chennai and see how locals react. For more details watch the CNN IBN Abu Amzi rally video.
The MNS vs SP fight which initially started took a bad turn and media reported it as marathis vs north indians. Media in India nowdays are baised and dont show the true picture. They showed MNS and Raj as a villian. Why these news channel didnt show the Abu Azmi rally speech ? Ask any north indian living in mumbai, have they been threatened. No because Mumbai is a peaceful city and those living in this city can understand.Mumbai has always welcome anyone and everyone from all the part of the country.
RE:Know the Facts
by rahul rahul on Feb 11, 2008 04:54 AM Permalink
here are gujrathis, marwaris, tamilians, mallus, kannadiagana etc etc in the city, but none of these use their festivals to show their strength. Ask a mumbaikar how most of these north indians live 10-15 in a small room, living filthy , driving auto/taxi illegally, putting up bhel puri, paani poori stalls illegally. Any person who goes a particular place should respect the law of the land and respect local cultures.
Here are few question Why do you always see biharis in Indian railways ? Why are the Recruitment Ads for Mumbai, Maharashtra region is put in newspapers in UP, Bihar? Doesn't Lalu , Paswan favour the people from his region, So whats wrong in Raj Thakrey raising issues about Maharastrians and Mumbaikars ?
A true mumbaikar even those from UP, Bihar who are settled in mumbai for long time and tell you how a big mess mumbai has become, slums , crimes , etc etc. And we all know who is responsible for all this. The party which claims that they have made uttar pradesh as UTTAM Pardesh are now out of power in their home state come up with a new slogan UP HAAMRI hain ab MAHARASTRA ki baari hain. Let these parties first take care of UP and then think about other states.
