RE:THE UPRISING IN JAMMU: Cont.. to my previous comment
by Neptune on Aug 07, 2008 11:32 AM Permalink
Article 370 or whatever needs to be repealed. All Indians have a right to live anywhere in India and if Kashmir is a part of India we need the same laws to be implemnted there. Let the PDP and KLD parties go to Muzzafarabad they will come to know the difference.
I am apalled at the biased attitude of some channels against Hindus. They seem to forget that the agitation was started by the Kashmiri Muslims against the allocation of land and they held the state to ransom for a good two weeks and without any dialogue, consultation or thought process the Government revoked the land allocation order. Even after this was done the protestors including Yasin Malik burst fire crackers and celebrated their so called Victory against the Hindus. Now Yasin Malik is pleading for peace and harmony and non communalisation of the issue. It wasn't the Hindu's that started this in the first place. The entire media is showing that the people of Jammu are at fault and they are illegitimate in their demands. If the land is already being used by the worshippers then what is the problem of the Kashmiri muslims to formally allocate the land to them. Why did the create such a big hue and cry in the first place? While Omar Abdullah some tv channels have showered praises for his so called "patriotic" speech in parliament (which I totally disagree with) can buy land and homes anywhere in India he is against giving land for a Hindu shrine in Kashmir. Is this India? Are we begging for land in our own country. Omar abdullah has two houses in "India" one in Bangalore and one in Delhi, but he vehemently opposes allocating the land to a Hindu shrine, HYPOCRITES HE AND HIS FATHER AND GRANDFATHER Although I'm Catholic I am greatly moved by the ways the Hi
RE:Media Biased against Hindus
by Neptune on Aug 07, 2008 11:25 AM Permalink
Although I'm Catholic I am greatly moved by the ways the Hindu's are being treated in this country by the Government and this is being done merely for votes. But now even the media seems biased against the hindus by saying that their agitation is damaging the secular fabric of our country.
RE:Politics of appeasement
by aoneall on Aug 07, 2008 12:33 PM Permalink
Is it an issue of real estate dispute? No, you are not honest and not telling the truth. The fact is that if it was a matter of real estate dispute, it could have been solved long ago.You guys have a religio-political agenda and that is complicating the situation.
RE:To the people of this country
by Arif on Aug 07, 2008 11:00 AM Permalink
You are asking for such a good work of helping the people then why are you directing the readers to a terrorist website ?
RE:To the people of this country
by Vijay urf Teesmar Singh on Aug 07, 2008 11:04 AM Permalink
If you think that this is a terrorist website, then give all information to police and get reward.
RE:To the people of this country
by palash ghosh on Aug 07, 2008 11:07 AM Permalink
The RSS was responsible for killing Mahatma as well as cauisng numerous riots. It has been banned several times. That way it is a terrorsit organization
RE:To the people of this country
by Arif on Aug 07, 2008 11:10 AM Permalink
No for some hindus it is not a terrorist organisation because they are hell bent on giving terrorism a democractic legitimcay.
RE:To the people of this country
by palash ghosh on Aug 07, 2008 11:14 AM Permalink
Dont worry Mr Arif those Hindua are in a minority and will always be in a minority. RSS and it allies will never be able to capture majority Hindu view with its hate campaigns
RE:To the people of this country
by galilio on Aug 07, 2008 12:31 PM Permalink
Even indra gandhi and nehru appreciated the work of RSS during the war period as RSS cadres went to border areas to donate blood to injured army men.communists bengalies were writting poems and singing songs praise of mao,lenin, stalin during the time of war supporting china. you people showed affinity and affection to islamic terrorists of east bengal by telling they also speak bengali language like you. now your west bengal has 40% bangaladesh muslims due to the support of communists who wanted to change the demography of west bengal to create a permanent vote bank of muslims. Soon west bengal will be a kashmir with fight between bangaladesh muslims and native bengalies when you would realise the truth of RSS warning.
RE:To the people of this country
by Arif on Aug 07, 2008 11:06 AM Permalink
Which police ? The one that helps these terrorists commit mass murders ? Come on you must be kiddin mate!!!
RE:Congress MUST go
by Vijay urf Teesmar Singh on Aug 07, 2008 11:05 AM Permalink
Pl don't insult jokers. Jokers at least entertain the people, while congress in killing and ruining them.
Lif is becoming incresingly difficult, with the spread of Islamic fundamentalism.In the coming general elections, the Hindus constituting 87% of the Indian population should vote for BJP to decisively decide a safe future. Cong, CPM,RJD,SP should be shown their places in the coming elections.They all shed crocodile tears, calling BJP anti secular. To use the word 'Secular' anymore in future is criminal.If we are able to keep the country in tact, it is because of the Hindu democratic way of life.All Hindus should unite and give fitting reply to the so called Pseudo secularist.We should cede some part of Kashmir to the fundamentalist muslims, who amongthemselves will fight and ruin the state.And the border with pakistan and Bangladesh should be electrically fenced, so as to prevent the infiltration and aiding of the local muslims.Only BJP can undertake this gigantic effort.
RE:Future of India
by palash ghosh on Aug 07, 2008 10:51 AM Permalink
what about states with non Hindu majority like NE states as well as states were there are lot of Non Hindus like Kerala,WB,AP,Tamil NAdu etc etc etc not to mention Punjab If India will no longer be secular how do you propose to keep all these states still in India. Maybe u shuld think before u talk
RE:Future of India
by Dravidian on Aug 07, 2008 10:57 AM Permalink
Secularism is different from pseudo-secularism. Congress and allies practice pseudo-secularism of the worst kind, which involves appeasing the minority religions, especially Islam and taking a dig at Hindus at every opportunity. India should be secular, but not pseudo-secular.
RE:Future of India
by Vidya Vikas on Aug 07, 2008 11:22 AM Permalink
Hi who told you there are lot of Non Hindus in AP and Tamilnadu.Still the majority of people are hindus.Only NE States and Kerala have More Non Hindus still i doubt that ther will be more number of Hindus in those states also
RE:Future of India
by palash ghosh on Aug 07, 2008 11:59 AM Permalink
MAybe u dont understand English. I never said AP and TN are Minority dominated states . I only said there are lot of ppl from minority community in those states. I never enied that Hindus are in majority on those states
RE:Future of India
by galilio on Aug 07, 2008 12:43 PM Permalink
In north india,problem comes from muslims and in South india problem comes from christians who engage in conversion job.hindus are in receiving end always.however hindus are majority to 81% while muslims are 14%,6% are christians as christians population increased by 3% in states like tamilnadu,andhra,karnataka maharashtra with rapid conversion thanks to the support of respective congress party and vatigan appointed lady queen heading congress party. Today Rahul says he would visit every villages to explain the benefits of nuclear deal which would ripe them with benefit after 15 years from now. so congress ruled 60 years already and did not do anything worthwhile and further 15 years would make this country to worst situation.their sole aim is to reduced hindus populations considerably in order to stay in power by psedo secularists,communists,ratinalist atheists.
RE:Future of India
by santosh on Aug 07, 2008 11:00 AM Permalink
Yes u r right. All hindus should vote for BJP and make it the largest party. Only BLP can save India
RE:Future of India
by palash ghosh on Aug 07, 2008 11:04 AM Permalink
Are u sure. Shuldnt Hindus vote for Shiv Sena or some other parties on the lunatic fringe. Dont forget the BJP central govmt cudnt do anything for Ram temple. Maybe Shiv Sena is the right bet for lunatics like u
Come to centre. BJP was in power with alliance with some other party, and the goernment formed under BJP at that time, worked under a Common Minimum Programme. Any deviation from that CMP was not acceptable to JD(U), TDP, AIADMK etc.
Therefore, the BJP gfovernment had to shelve Ram Temple and Article 370 plan in cold storage. Give them a clear mandate and you will see the difference.
RE:Future of India
by galilio on Aug 07, 2008 04:26 PM Permalink
goose,unless two third majority in parliment, no governement can cancell article 370 and can decide future action.in the case of Ram temple, main enemy for ram temple is TDP,AGP,MAMTHA BANNERJI,omar abhdullah who was with NDA. navin patnaik,jayalalitha are silently okay to ram temple constuction. janata dal united is manageble to some extend. BJP has to balance 24 parties in NDA govt.you can not blame them.
