there is one solution removal of 370 aritcles and settlement of ex-army men in kashmir and retierd army people ...with free land ..... irrespective of religion ....
RE:there is one solution removal of 370 aritcles and settlement of ex-army men in kashmir
by satyarthi on Aug 06, 2008 08:10 PM Permalink
Yes. Now we started realising the true implication of Article 370.
My dear friends, there is nothing called secularism for these dirty politicians. It is a way of making maoney. I request everyone to come in big numbers during election and vote for a party which stands for Hinduism and its people. Please do not take money and vote for wrong people. If BJP is voted to Power at the centre with Majority, we will accomplish the task which we don express- Jai Hind.
RE:amarnath issue
by Golden on Aug 06, 2008 08:19 PM Permalink
and then advani will get him killed in a car mishap and will earn the sympathy vote also...LOL...
This is a dangerous game that some people are playing. Omar Abdullah should not forget that the land they call their own actually belongs to Maharaja Ranjit Singh and the Dogra Rajas Gulab Singh and Hari Singh. This land was taken aways from Kashmiri Pandits and Dogras and given to the Muslims. Abdullah said he is fighting for his land and he would not give an inch of the land to the Hindus. He should remember that Duryodhan also made a similar statement and the whole family perished in the battle which Pandavas went on to win.Hindus' demand is very legitimate and it is that the land allotted to the Sri Amarnath Shrine Board should be restored with immediate effect as it amounts to a contempt of court because it was after the Jammu and Kashmir high court cleared the proposal that the land was allotted and that too after paying a fee of Rs 2.45 crore for raising temporary infrastructure to create facilities for the pilgrims. This is an attempt to finish off our identity.
RE:Who is communal?
by Ranjith on Aug 06, 2008 08:04 PM Permalink
The answer for your all question, becoz Indian is Seculor Country and it is not HINDUS country. Dont compare India with Pakistan/Bangaladesh coz those country for Muslims. U got it?
RE:Who is communal?
by Azhar yasin on Aug 06, 2008 08:01 PM Permalink
J&K is different from other states not from a religious point of view but from political point of view. Go back into history and check the details. J&K accepted the accession to India under certain conditions which are manifested in art 370. Stop giving it a religious color.
RE:RE:Who is communal?
by satyarthi on Aug 06, 2008 08:06 PM Permalink
The world has seen the true colour of Kashmiriyat and Secularism. It was a concept propogated by nehru Gandhi clan to fool and rule India.
RE:Who is communal?
by vinod travel on Aug 06, 2008 07:58 PM Permalink
13. Why Ghandiji objected to the decision of the cabinet and insisted that Somnath Temple should be reconstructed out of public fund, not government funds. When in January 1948 he pressurized Nehru and Patel to carry on renovation of the mosques of Delhi at government expenses? 14. If Muslims & Christians are minorities in Maharashtra, UP, Bihar, etc., are Hindus not minorities in J&K, Mizoram, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya etc? Why are Hindus denied minority rights in these states? 15. Do you admit that Hindus have problems that need to be recognized? Or do you think that those who call themselves Hindus are themselves the problem? 16. Why post-Godhra is blown out proportion, when no one talks of the ethnic cleansing of 4 lakh Hindus from Kashmir? 17. In 1947, when India was partitioned, the Hindu population in Pakistan was about 24%. Today it is not even 1%. In 1947, the Hindu population in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) was 30%. Today it is about 7%. What happened to the missing Hindus? Do Hindus have human rights? 18. In contrast, in India, Muslim population has gone up from 10.4% in 1951 to about 14% today; whereas Hindu population has come
RE:Who is communal?
by Ajay Kulkarni on Aug 06, 2008 08:00 PM Permalink
Vinod, I am from maharastra. Maharashtra has seen a huge increase in muslim population. Go to places like Mumbra, Bhivandi, Malegaon and many more they all turned muslim majority.
RE:Who is communal?
by satyarthi on Aug 06, 2008 08:04 PM Permalink
Ajay, entire india including kashmir is fcing large scale influx of muslim population. Even those who opted for pakistan are sending their children back to India. The partition itself was highly tilted in favour of muslims. They got proportionately more resources at the time of partition. yet they keep infilterating into our land, in connivance of 'merchants of muslim votes'.
RE:RE:Who is communal?
by vinod travel on Aug 06, 2008 08:02 PM Permalink
Yaar i am from Jogeshwari. The whole Jogeshwari (west) have become like Mini Pakistan. This is how this fanatic work they expand like bacteria its time for us to become more LETHAL
RE:Who is communal?
by Arif on Aug 06, 2008 08:04 PM Permalink
Hinduism is the MOST DENSELY POPULATED RELIGION ON THIS PLANET.What should be done with you ?
RE:Who is communal?
by Ajay Kulkarni on Aug 06, 2008 08:04 PM Permalink
Tum log population badhane ke alawa kya kar sakte ho? Sirf bacche padia karna aur islam badhana bas itna hi jante ho? mujhe batao ki muslim society is duniya ko kya diya hai. kuch nahi Osama Bin Laden, Terrosits aur Salman rashdie jo khud muslim hai aur woh kahta hai ki islam jaisa bewakoof religion maine aaj tak nahi dekha.
RE:Who is communal?
by Arif on Aug 06, 2008 08:14 PM Permalink
GOOD!! First congratulations on realizing the fact you are the MOST DENSELY POPULATED RELIGION on this planet. Second if you dont know a thing about science then its better to keep quiet. Now try to find the roots of modern science.
RE:Who is communal?
by Ajay Kulkarni on Aug 06, 2008 08:09 PM Permalink
We have given Aryabhatt who has discovered Sero, Our old saints has discovered so many medicines which treats so many incurable dieseases. We have a Yoga ,which talks about healthy life and the whole world is understanding the importance of it. Tell me one thing from islam which has given something to this world?
The forces demanding ban on RSS actually want to support conversion on a large scale.
They don't know that once RSS is gone, their grand children and children will be known by the name of Ansaris, Syeds and Abrahams. And all of them start eating beef.
RE:RE:RSS is the only force resisting conversion drives by Muslims and Christans.
by Rash on Aug 06, 2008 08:03 PM Permalink
Thats spared for you people....LOL
RE:RSS is the only force resisting conversion drives by Muslims and Christans.
by Golden on Aug 06, 2008 08:09 PM Permalink
are yaar. is se kya baat karta hai. iska naam hai satayarthi...
isne to pahle hi saty ki arthi utha rakhi hai..ab yeh jab bhi bolega jhoot hi bolega...
RE:RSS is the only force resisting conversion drives by Muslims and Christans.
by satyarthi on Aug 06, 2008 08:01 PM Permalink
Any opinion about pork eating?
RE:RSS is the only force resisting conversion drives by Muslims and Christans.
by Rash on Aug 06, 2008 08:02 PM Permalink
We eat only lawful animals if you feel you get proteins even from that also then you can go for that option.........
RE:RSS is the only force resisting conversion drives by Muslims and Christans.
by chotelal on Aug 06, 2008 08:16 PM Permalink
Abey pig ne aisa kaun sa gairkanooni kaam kiya hai ??? lawful animal !!! I just googled a li'l bit and here it is what I got for the protein content in pork
RE:RE:RE:RE:RSS is the only force resisting conversion drives by Muslims and Christans.
by chotelal on Aug 06, 2008 08:19 PM Permalink
Arey beta lagta hai tera chashma bhi gum gaya hai ... jiski history ki spelling tune theek ki thi wo main nahi tha .. maine bas wo msg padha tha ... khair wo hata kate tiwari ye bata ki toilet aur moot se itna fascination kyun hai tum log ko ... bata aur chila banana inaam mein milega tumko .. samajh rahe ho na ek dam chila hua banana !!!!
There must have been a set of deep anger and hurt feelings among Jammu region citizens,that they have united to oppose Government moves and policies. Piece of land or no piece of land-- Does that pinch so much or it has crystalised the pains.Pandits and other Hindus who were driven out from valley,whose houses,properties were taken away,temples destroyed,never reacted this much sharply.It seems wounds are far deep. Look at and hear Political leaders like Abdullahs or PDPs`or Congress M.P s`.They are still not able to digest the gestures and postures of Jammu and other parts of India.They in turn are threatening to Govt. and India as if they themselves are not Indian.The message is loud and clear.Most of secularists including Congress have been pleading for the cause of seperatists and always keep appeasing valley Muslims at the cost of other Hindu communities.It is rare that Hindus reacted anytime.This is probably first time.Loosing tempers and resorting to voilence is itself self defeating.The agitation should have been peaceful and strategic in nature.Muslim leadership has been very tactful ever since 1948.They draw all benefits from India,curse India with every sip of water.They hold the carrots and Indian Governments in a row have been chasing these carrots and in turn feel assured as if territory and people belong to them.Congress does not get votes,ends up appeasing time and again. It is not pleasant to visualise,the outcome of this protest.Obvious is polarisation,which
RE:Hindus hardly react
by Sudhir Athekkattil on Aug 06, 2008 08:02 PM Permalink
Don't try to pick your stick to beat the bush. Issue here is the raw going on all over Jammu & Kashmir. Jot your views if you can.
The present govt.is following a policy of apartheid towards the majority community typical to former South Africa. Hinduism and hindus are despised,direspected,deprieved,deceived and duped by our present day rulers.Whereas, every act of Jihadi terror is justified in one pretext or the other.It seems that the Hindu culture is facing a danger worse than during the Mugual and British rule. Unless we unite and rise up against this injustice,the greatest and the oldest culture of the world is destined to be doomed.
RE:Apartheid against Hindus
by Zinda Dil on Aug 06, 2008 07:49 PM Permalink
Hindus have practiced apartheid against Shudras for centuries. Now you may just get a taste of your own medicine.
RE:Apartheid against Hindus
by Manish on Aug 06, 2008 07:59 PM Permalink
You lucky that other people do not go in history and act on tit for tat..otherwise I can assure you that Babar, gajani, gauri were not doing a nobel task !!
RE:Apartheid against Hindus
by satyarthi on Aug 06, 2008 07:57 PM Permalink
Wrong. Hindus were constrained by alien rulers. This was a passive but effective defence mechanism relevant to that era.
RE:Apartheid against Hindus
by Golden on Aug 06, 2008 08:00 PM Permalink
upper caste hindus have denied the rights of lower caste hindus for long. now they are tasting the same medicine. these suppressed people have now taken a stance and are very much on the path of getting their rights. so these upper caste hindus suddenly feeling that hindism is under attack. LOL..
RE:Apartheid against Hindus
by satyarthi on Aug 06, 2008 08:41 PM Permalink
Except hindus, no other race gave similar protection to weaker section of the society. They simply slaughtered them. Don't teach humanity to hindus.
