Terrorists in India are very planned and comprehensive and they have carried out a series of terrorist activities in the past.
How come they attacked Parliament and failed miserably?
How come not a single bomg (out of 22) exploded in Surat?
Two major failures by organized group.
JUST WONDERING OUT LOUD.
Today Uma Bharti isuued a CD. Again JUST WONDERING. Election Years.
The Message: All HINDUS must unite against CORRUPT (gave money to MP's), PRO TERRORIST (did not enact strong laws like POTA) parties like UPA and vote BJP IN.
When you say BJP is an evil you are also insulting the electorate that has sent 130 BJP MPs into the Lok Sabha. How many BJP allies ruled states?...9..The puppet PM says minorities have the first right over resources....when 80% of the population is Hindu, how can you say this?It's a shame that the PM makes such statemetns....It's hight time he be sent to West Punjab to his birthplace and enjoy the company of Secular Pakistanis !!
RE:When you say BJP is an evil....remember....
by Suraj Singh on Aug 01, 2008 11:00 PM Permalink
"We will have to devise innovative plans to ensure that minorities, particularly the Muslim minority, are empowered to share equitably in the fruits of development. They must have the first claim on resources" "I could not sleep thinking about Hanif" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manmohan_Singh
RE:India has no choice except to go for N-deal...BUT....
by Jo Ho on Aug 01, 2008 11:03 PM Permalink
We've hydel and tydal options also. Nuclear will not generate energy to use immediately also. Segregation of reactors, dumping the waste materials etc are other expensive issues but you're absolutely right about the cheerleader and her ofice boy. Do you smell the motive?
RE:India has no choice except to go for N-deal...BUT....
by Sharma on Aug 01, 2008 11:03 PM Permalink
Its a reality and we are able to stop that up to some extant we can but here I reading posts some of them are child and some of them are do not want to accept reality remains like us will be filtered by these.
RE:India has no choice except to go for N-deal...BUT....
by Suraj Singh on Aug 01, 2008 11:05 PM Permalink
Myth #11: India needs more nuclear power to assure its energy future.
Fact: Nuclear power has been virtually insignificant in India’s energy mix in the past, and will be no more important in the future. India has been generating electricity with nuclear reactors for more than 40 years. Yet, reactors supply only 2% to 3% of its electricity today. India has not built more reactors because they have not turned out to be as safe, or as clean, or – most important – as economical as originally thought. Even if India were to achieve a 50% increase in nuclear power generation (which is unlikely) such a step would only increase India’s overall electricity output by one percent at most, and would only increase India’s overall energy output by a fraction of one percent. That is not a significant increase in the energy available to India and would not decrease India’s demand for oil and gas.
What India is going to achieve is that all the nuclear reactors gradually will be under IAEA safeguards. So, what is the achievement? Ultimately, what will be the difference between NPT and 123? Well - 123 is a synonym of NPT for Indians for making them 'ullu'. And ultimately, who dances to the tune of it? Let us congratulate them for a big success. The slaves will remain slaves for ever. Come on, let us congratulate the slave party for finding another new Master of their Masters. BJP wanted something at par;that was practically unachievable and voting at the non Confidence motion was practically impossible. The taxpayers money and US taxpayers money were working at the same direction as we all have seen it on TV. I doubt if BJP alone could do anything.
RE:BJP was right, at least it seems to me
by Suraj Singh on Aug 01, 2008 10:59 PM Permalink
Myth #14: The deal is not primarily about making money; it is about creating a new U.S. strategic relationship in south Asia.
Fact: The deal is primarily about making money. The main effect of the deal will be to pardon India – to remove it as a violator of international norms. After such a change in status, there will be no impediment to U.S. arms sales. This is where the real money is, not in nuclear reactors. U.S. exporters have mentioned selling as much as $1.4 billion worth of Boeing airliners, hundreds of F-16 or F/A-18 fighter jets, as well as maritime surveillance planes, advanced radar, helicopters, missile defense and other equipment. The Russian press has even complained that the nuclear deal is a ploy to squeeze Russia out of the Indian arms market.
Yes, Manmohan Singh is a good economist but actually it is on that front that this government must be attacked. Rather than gradually raise oil prices so that the effect of inflation is kept under check these bozos got into such a false sense of security that they thought the party will never end. Hence we get this one really horrible year and if the true price of oil gets reflected petrol would be selling at about 75 rupees a litre in India which would take inflation to over 20 percent possibly 22 or 23 percent. Now let us even say that why blame poor Singh for oil prices. Japan produces almost no oil. They are almost hundred percent dependent on oil imports. India at least produces about 30 percent of its oil. But Japan imports almost all its oil. Yet inflation this year in Japan is about 1 percent. It is about 3 percent in other countries in Europe which also import quite a lot of oil. So, certainly our two "esteemed" economists Singh and Chidambaram must take some blame on this count.
RE:Can anyone explain how is this deal good for India?
by Suraj Singh on Aug 01, 2008 10:59 PM Permalink
Myth #11: India needs more nuclear power to assure its energy future.
Fact: Nuclear power has been virtually insignificant in India’s energy mix in the past, and will be no more important in the future. India has been generating electricity with nuclear reactors for more than 40 years. Yet, reactors supply only 2% to 3% of its electricity today. India has not built more reactors because they have not turned out to be as safe, or as clean, or – most important – as economical as originally thought. Even if India were to achieve a 50% increase in nuclear power generation (which is unlikely) such a step would only increase India’s overall electricity output by one percent at most, and would only increase India’s overall energy output by a fraction of one percent. That is not a significant increase in the energy available to India and would not decrease India’s demand for oil and gas.
The biggest looser out of all this fiasco (created by communists BJP) is the cunning and opportunist BJP, because communists proven to be on principle, they threat the support and they actually act upon it, and congress proved to be the strongest sticking to the deal even at the cost of loosing the government(in the interest of nation), the BJP first it try to present itself as in favor of the deal, and when it see an opportunity to topple the government it sided with communists(so much for sake of nationalism ? all BS), this is the real face of BJP. The end result India win BJP loose.
RE:Nuclear deal India win BJP loose
by Suraj Singh on Aug 01, 2008 10:36 PM Permalink
Myth #11: India needs more nuclear power to assure its energy future.
Fact: Nuclear power has been virtually insignificant in India’s energy mix in the past, and will be no more important in the future. India has been generating electricity with nuclear reactors for more than 40 years. Yet, reactors supply only 2% to 3% of its electricity today. India has not built more reactors because they have not turned out to be as safe, or as clean, or – most important – as economical as originally thought. Even if India were to achieve a 50% increase in nuclear power generation (which is unlikely) such a step would only increase India’s overall electricity output by one percent at most, and would only increase India’s overall energy output by a fraction of one percent. That is not a significant increase in the energy available to India and would not decrease India’s demand for oil and gas.
Myth #11: India needs more nuclear power to assure its energy future.
Fact: Nuclear power has been virtually insignificant in India’s energy mix in the past, and will be no more important in the future. India has been generating electricity with nuclear reactors for more than 40 years. Yet, reactors supply only 2% to 3% of its electricity today. India has not built more reactors because they have not turned out to be as safe, or as clean, or – most important – as economical as originally thought. Even if India were to achieve a 50% increase in nuclear power generation (which is unlikely) such a step would only increase India’s overall electricity output by one percent at most, and would only increase India’s overall energy output by a fraction of one percent. That is not a significant increase in the energy available to India and would not decrease India’s demand for oil and gas.
RE:Myth #11: India needs more nuclear power to assure its energy future.
by Suraj Singh on Aug 01, 2008 10:37 PM Permalink
Myth #14: The deal is not primarily about making money; it is about creating a new U.S. strategic relationship in south Asia.
Fact: The deal is primarily about making money. The main effect of the deal will be to pardon India – to remove it as a violator of international norms. After such a change in status, there will be no impediment to U.S. arms sales. This is where the real money is, not in nuclear reactors. U.S. exporters have mentioned selling as much as $1.4 billion worth of Boeing airliners, hundreds of F-16 or F/A-18 fighter jets, as well as maritime surveillance planes, advanced radar, helicopters, missile defense and other equipment. The Russian press has even complained that the nuclear deal is a ploy to squeeze Russia out of the Indian arms market.
RE:Kudos Mr Prime Minister
by Suraj Singh on Aug 01, 2008 10:31 PM Permalink
Myth #14: The deal is not primarily about making money; it is about creating a new U.S. strategic relationship in south Asia.
Fact: The deal is primarily about making money. The main effect of the deal will be to pardon India – to remove it as a violator of international norms. After such a change in status, there will be no impediment to U.S. arms sales. This is where the real money is, not in nuclear reactors. U.S. exporters have mentioned selling as much as $1.4 billion worth of Boeing airliners, hundreds of F-16 or F/A-18 fighter jets, as well as maritime surveillance planes, advanced radar, helicopters, missile defense and other equipment. The Russian press has even complained that the nuclear deal is a ploy to squeeze Russia out of the Indian arms market.
RE:RE:Kudos Mr Prime Minister
by Suraj Singh on Aug 01, 2008 10:33 PM Permalink
Myth #11: India needs more nuclear power to assure its energy future.
Fact: Nuclear power has been virtually insignificant in India’s energy mix in the past, and will be no more important in the future. India has been generating electricity with nuclear reactors for more than 40 years. Yet, reactors supply only 2% to 3% of its electricity today. India has not built more reactors because they have not turned out to be as safe, or as clean, or – most important – as economical as originally thought. Even if India were to achieve a 50% increase in nuclear power generation (which is unlikely) such a step would only increase India’s overall electricity output by one percent at most, and would only increase India’s overall energy output by a fraction of one percent. That is not a significant increase in the energy available to India and would not decrease India’s demand for oil and gas.
RE:Kudos Mr Prime Minister
by Sandeep on Aug 01, 2008 11:47 PM Permalink
All based on mis-representation of facts. India's current reactors are not able to run more than at 50% capacity due to shortage of fuel.
And India is talking about 6-7 times(600-700%) if they manage to get 20,000 MW. Please do some research before putting some posts which have wrong facts or are propaganda material
RE:Kudos Mr Prime Minister
by AADIL on Aug 01, 2008 10:39 PM Permalink
That the matter where no body wants to go the reason behind its a universal truth and we will loose more than we will get.
RE:RE:Kudos Mr Prime Minister
by Sandeep on Aug 01, 2008 11:49 PM Permalink
So what is the problem with that? India gets one more option to import arms. Nothing wrong there, isn't it? Buy whatever is best..
RE:Useless PM who cannot counteract terror
by Sharma on Aug 01, 2008 10:54 PM Permalink
you are right but our few friends might be entertained by Soniaji and PM so they are singing like congress and Unique Propaganda Alliance.
