thts the problem with democracy..every1 thinks they have all the knowledge to put forth their point. I bet no one has read/understand the 123 agreement. I am proud of Manmohan Singh for going ahead with the deal by hook or by crook...stop this discussions now..the deal is done...jo hoga dekha jaayegaa...life is all abt taking risks! I am very much happy to see Pakistan sulking as they didnt get this type of deal :-)
RE:Man Landed On Moon. Really !?? Please Answer
by TheOneAndOnly on Aug 02, 2008 01:36 AM Permalink
(Contd.) IF ALL IS DONE :
What is that Technology or SpaceMachine used to Achieve All that ?
After 40yrs, why are they Not using the Same even within and around the Earth ??
Why are there Accidents of Aeroplanes ? Why are we Still Building Aerodromes investing Millions of Dollars, When Man could Land on any Random Waste Land on the Moon ? Why not do the Same on Earth ?
Why don't they use the Same Technology for All the Later Space Missions ? Why Columbia or Discovery or Challenger Failed ? Why couldn't they use the Same Highly Reliable Technology and Methodology of Landing and TakingOff used in LANDING On MOON, Where the target was an unknown and some random piece of Surface of Moon ??
IS MOON LANDING Of MAN, REAL ?
MY Level of FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS, doesn't Allow that really happen.
RE:Man Landed On Moon. Really !?? Please Answer
by Your Persona on Aug 02, 2008 04:39 AM Permalink
LOL... So you had this discussion with someone (who clearly is as uneducated as you are) and you thought, "Hey! There is no way they propel the rocket/space shuttle/satellite around in outer space, where there is no oxygen or air to push against" and thought yourself to be a genius, huh?
Firstly, this is the wrong forum to discuss college physics, secondly, refer to some basic college physics and you will understand the answers to your questions. If you need some help to get started, use this link:
RE:PLEASE STOP NUCLEAR DEAL - ADVANI/MODI AND KARAT BUILDING GOBAR GAS TECHNOLOGY..
by Bhardwaj Velamakanni on Aug 01, 2008 11:41 PM Permalink
If that really happens then the Owner of the Rediff will be the Richest man in the world .. for you can extract most of the filth in the world from the rediff message boards :))
RE:PLEASE STOP NUCLEAR DEAL - ADVANI/MODI AND KARAT BUILDING GOBAR GAS TECHNOLOGY..
by Bhardwaj Velamakanni on Aug 01, 2008 11:43 PM Permalink
And we can call that "ReFiNE" = REdiff's Filth Instead of Natural Energy :))
RE:PLEASE STOP NUCLEAR DEAL - ADVANI/MODI AND KARAT BUILDING GOBAR GAS TECHNOLOGY..
by Sanjay Gupta on Aug 02, 2008 01:02 AM Permalink
Dear Friends,
We all know that opposition to the Nuclear Deal is nothing but small politics. Here are just a couple of advantages stemming from the deal for our country, envisioned by some experts:
Without expanding its nuclear power program, India would have to import an additional 1.6 billion tons of coal per year by 2050 to keep up with energy demand, said Indian atomic agency chief Anil Kakodkar in a July 4 speech to the country's Academy of Science. India, with about 1.1 billion people, expects electricity demand to rise to 7,957 terawatt hours in 2050 from 697 terawatt hours today.
The deal `` will make a significant contribution to energy and climate security, as well as development and economic objectives,'' Simon Smith, the U.K. envoy to the IAEA, said in a statement.
RE:Modi Done In by his Own Rivals Within BJP?
by nikhil on Aug 02, 2008 03:06 AM Permalink
you are suprebly intelligent...hail to you..wonder why you wasting time on this topic n forum??? well, you need to sort out your priorities...darkness (bomb urself n innocents) or light(freedom of living n let other live)...you seem intelligent to pick the one??or do you???????????? well, by all means dont get dishearted n start blowing people up....modern medicine have something called consuling....else follow the good old religion of Sanatan Dharama...remember...what can't be created can't be destroyed. Welcome your questions.
ones all set, India will have freedom to choose any country among NSG to be its supplier, and Russian to be its main ally we will have advantage of building futher good ecomonic relationships with it and other too.
its a win and win game for all thats why non wish to stop India to be their profit center and in return India will have lead and strong it role as head of non alignment countries.
Myth #14: The deal is not primarily about making money; it is about creating a new U.S. strategic relationship in south Asia.
Fact: The deal is primarily about making money. The main effect of the deal will be to pardon India – to remove it as a violator of international norms. After such a change in status, there will be no impediment to U.S. arms sales. This is where the real money is, not in nuclear reactors. U.S. exporters have mentioned selling as much as $1.4 billion worth of Boeing airliners, hundreds of F-16 or F/A-18 fighter jets, as well as maritime surveillance planes, advanced radar, helicopters, missile defense and other equipment. The Russian press has even complained that the nuclear deal is a ploy to squeeze Russia out of the Indian arms market.
RE:The deal is primarily about making money
by Sandeep on Aug 02, 2008 12:07 AM Permalink
You seem to be against nuclear deal but the point you are giving is actually one of benefits India can get by this deal. Having more suppliers is usually a good thing as you have a better choice. India can buy whatever suits best from a wider selection.
RE:The deal is primarily about making money
by TheOneAndOnly on Aug 02, 2008 12:16 AM Permalink
Observe the following Words Said by ElBaradei abt the Deal.
... the pact, which is 'good' for moving towards a nuclear weapons free world.
... ElBaradei said the pact will help the non-proliferation regime
...good for the world and for non-proliferation.
"The agreement is good for our collective efforts to move towards a world free from nuclear weapons. The agreement brings India closer to the debate of our ultimate goal -- Nuclear Non-proliferation treaty -- for establishing a world free from nuclear weapons," he said
If we have to eliminate nuclear arms, this kind of dialogue has to be universal and inclusive, ElBaradei said.
RE:The deal is primarily about making money
by Sandeep on Aug 02, 2008 12:37 AM Permalink
India is already not proliferating Nuclear weapons.
ElBaradei also says this is good for eliminating global nuclear weapons which is a good thing. He is not saying this will help to remove weapons from India.. Read whatever he said again in correct context.
RE:The deal is primarily about making money
by All Right on Aug 02, 2008 05:57 AM Permalink
Sandeep:
You'd no doubt imagine that due to this deal, rest of the world will start throwing out their nuclear weapons.... oh by the way, there is nothing stopping the Indian nuclear juggernaut... :-) eh?... that's what the "context" is, isn't it?... :-)
