RE:Please Please see this video and you will know what is in store for the people of Nepal
by Andy on May 27, 2008 06:55 PM Permalink
do you know communism you fascist pig golry be communism
RE:Please Please see this video and you will know what is in store for the people of Nepal
by on May 06, 2008 01:53 AM Permalink
The people of Nepal have seen enough during the reign of the King and the Nepali Congress and they have voted for a change in a hope that Maoists may be able to change their current plight. You should respect that rather than condemning them for death.
RE:can he go there?
by satyarthi on Apr 30, 2008 02:25 PM Permalink
He should visit Nepal immediately in Hindu interest. Hindus should not give undue space to REDs.
Thats what he really is. And asking for presidency by hook or crook is not democracy. The people of Nepal had become fed up up the terror activities by the Maosit and the army could or did not have a free hand in cutting them off permanently. So the poor people had no choise but to accept the devil in the hpe that they will at least get to live.
WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT NEPAL? WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT MONARCHY OF NEPAL? WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT 2001 MASSCRE IN ROYAL HOUSE? AND WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT PRANCHADA, WHO'S REAL NAME IS PUSHPA KAMAL DAHAL? INFACT WE DO KNOW NOTHING ABOUT INSIDE HISTORY. WELL, TO KNOW ALL ABOUT IT, I WOULD LIKE TO WRITE IN SHORT, IN NEPAL,CASTEISM IS AS IT IS, DEVIDED BY 4 VARNAS,FIGHTING TO EACHOTHER,BRAMINS CAN NOT OPEN A LEATHER COMPANY OR SHOE -CHAPPAL SHOP AND THAKURS,SINGH'S CAN NOT WORK,PLOUGH THIER FIELDS EVEN WOMAN'S ASLO ,THEY DEPENDS ON OTHERS TO WORK ON THIER ZAMIN,EVEN SAMETHING WITH BRAMINS AS WELL,SO THIER WORKS TO BE DONE BY SUDRAS/TRIBALS AS THARU'S CHAUDHARY'S OR SOME OTHERS CASTES,THESE CASTE'S ARE VERY HARD WORKER AND EXPERT TO WORK ON THE FIELD.SO BAHUT SAARE UPER CASTE KE LOGON NE INHE LOGO SE KAAM KARWAYA,AUR INHE LOGO KO YE LOG KUCH PAISE UDHAR DIYA KARTE THE AUR, IF THE PERSON IS NOT ABLE TO PAY BACK HIS AMOUT THEN THEY USE TO GRAB THIER, ZAMIN, AISA LOOT PAAT BAHUT SAALO SE CHALTA AA RAHA THA, AND NO ONE WAS THERE TO TAKE CARE THESE POOR PEOPLE EVEN EDUCATION WISE ASLO THEY WERE TREATED DIFFEREBTLY AS SLAVES, INFACT MANY UPER CASTE POEPLE GRABED THIER LAND AND AT LAST THEY MAKE AS THIER SLAVES FOREVER, INFACT I MY SELF SEEN THESE HAPPENING.../ SO AT LAST PRANDA DID GOOD JOB FOR POOR PEOPLE AND BROUGHT THE Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), IN the leadership of Prachanda, infact gruella war happening becuase of the middle people..who are not at all related to the party and they use to gund
RE:Most read it and know about the internal truth.
by mumbai on Apr 30, 2008 11:50 AM Permalink
i can not understand what is the meaning of the last sentence. i think there is a spelling mistake in the last word. it right if we use "a" instead of "u"
RE:Most read it and know about the internal truth.
by satyarthi on Apr 30, 2008 02:29 PM Permalink
But situation in Nepal today is more like red revolution in Romania.
RE:RE:Most read it and know about the internal truth.
by Vishnu Sharma on May 01, 2008 10:06 PM Permalink
More appropriately it smack to the RED takeover of Cambodia. Both had chinese backing.
Everyone is to understand nobody can win hate with hate. Prachanda so far has not shown any reconcilation attitude towards the monarchy which was ruling from the last 250 years. Ruler will have to accept the peoples verdict, similarly elected representative is to accomodate the earlier rulers. They all are part of organisational system.
RE:whom are you trying to fool ?
by mumbai on Apr 30, 2008 11:43 AM Permalink
You mean to say that people should read and understand the article before commenting? I dont think it is happening in this message board. sometimes i see some articles that the writer himself is not clear. They write that report says, unidentified source says, it is believed tobe, apparently like that. sometime they dont give the dates of the event which they mention in their articles. Some people without reading the article start fighting for their own interests irrespective of the subject of the article. So Girish is not wrong.
