GOOD OR BAD ....ESCAPE FROM THE DESERT ONSLAUGHT....ECONOMIC AND RELIGIOUS !!! by GRJ on Jun 27, 2008 10:00 AM N DEAL.......WHITHERING ECONOMIES....DESERT CRAWLING !!! by GRJ on Jun 27, 2008 09:51 AM Permalink
A Week ago when I wrote that people of India want the N Deal many laughed at.
It is now proved that Indians are very intelligent survivors be it, Mughal period , British, Portugal, Dutch ..
They know clearly what they lack in their political .system and what they want as world citizens.
Politicians are too puny ....they can rarely even deliver daily food. to their electorate . They send them begging with bowls to neighbors.....They send their children to study abroad and settle......including Gandhi.
People know that they will be made to crawl in oil rich deserts for food ....with shackles of religion and fears of terrorism. HAIL THE INDIAN MASSES. DECIDE YOUR FUTURE !!! FORGET THE CUNNING POLITICIANS OF INDIA.
NUCLEAR CREDIBILITY by ratnajayant gudavally on Feb 01, 2008 09:39
Dear Mr.K.Subrahmanyam and Ms.Sheela Bhatt,PM., and President,
( BOLD PRINT FOR AN AWAKENING PLEASE )
TIME IS RUNNING OUT. POLITICS IS DIFFERENT... NUCLEAR POLICIES ARE DIFFERENT, SPECIALLY WHEN NOT ONLY INDIA, BUT THE WHOLE WORLD IS BEING PUSHED TO A VERGE OF DEVASTATION. .....BY THE SHORTSIGHTED ENEMIES OF PLANET EARTH. THEY ARE INHUMAN AND INTOXICATED BY ADAMENCE OF SELF RIGHTEOUS PLANS EITHER TO OWN UP OR DESTROY THE WORLD. THEIR PROCESS OF
Rajeev I clearly sifted every word on your articles and I have to admit that you have your point precise and clear. I was a supporter of the deal, as I was under clouded by the age old idea that anything that the Left's oppose should be good for the Country. I think we should dare to challenge the follow the white man style and set an example to the wold by using renewable energy----and for gods sake we have 90% of the country with 365 days of sunshine and a coastal belt of 6000kms with wind energy that could be harvested at such a low cost. I belive the only way of achieving that is through self sustaining village by village. we have never done anything on a national level, let it be roads bridges,dams or even telecom. it has to be some individual making a heroic effort from a village/town and then the country wakes up.
1.attempt to acquire the hydrocarbons it needs 2.improve the efficiency and effectiveness with which it uses energy 3.seek non-traditional sources of energy 4.slow down expectations of growth
Comments:
1.To do that you need to have a strong hold ( not just treaties) on geographical areas whrere hydrocarbons are deposited. That also meanst having the military muzzle to protect your intersets in these reqions - Highly improbable considering our policies and leadership 2.These is an aga old saying..Hardly a solution just a lip service. However much you save , your needs are growing 1000 times more 3.Yet again..It takes a hello lot of time to develop un conventional energy sources effectively. Already research is ongoing across the world for years..No major breakthroughs that can substitute the oil 4. SLowing Growth - Unacceptable. Do you slow your trim your growth down just becusae his needs are growing..-Absurd.
The only positive thing about the negotiations is what the NSG and the US is willing to concede. America could ease India's path to the treaty by sharing their nuclear weapons know how with India, something which they were willing to do with Great Britain about 50 years ago. If America is unwilling to ease India's path to H-bomb capability, I would be very sceptical about America's willingness to establish the strategic relationship as I understand it. I am not inclined to submit the country to the deal unless we have a tested H-bomb capability. The last nuclear tests were inconclusive though I am satisfied that the talent and know is there to establish such a capability.
The Australians might be inclined to be arrogant enough to make untenable demands by insisting on India abiding by the full rigours of the NNPT, they will also have to contend with the American desire to have India firmly established in the Western camp. India has tried to have it both ways by its emotional attachment to Nehru and Gandhi's socialism on the one hand, and access to its free market economy which means so much to the West's companies on the lookout for profits. Nuclear non-proliferation and profits is what this deal is about. The UPA is the last governing body in India which feels any need to get cuddly with America. I would only entertain this deal on the basis I have just outlined.
>On what basis is India thinking of buying nuclear reactors from the US?
I am amazed Rajeev makes this gaffe. The deal has nothing to do with where India buys its fuel or reactors, once such trade is made possible by the deal. My bet would be on purchases from France and Japan.
Finally, Rajeev has come out with his views on the nuclear deal. I wish he would express his opinion of the other most important thing happening or not happening to India, namely, Mayawati Naina Kumari. Rajeevs silence kills more than his words do.
RE:Finally
by Sahadevan KK on Apr 25, 2008 02:42 PM Permalink
You have a strange idea of Mayawati's importance. The most important thing happening in India is the success of us comrades in taking over yet another of India's neighbours (Nepal), and exporting revolution all over India. We will then win all elections through intimidation. Your Mayawati doesn't stand a chance against us. See what we are doing in Nepal.
RE:Finally
by Manjula A on Apr 25, 2008 02:50 PM Permalink
Hi Rajeev. Will this mean that your next article will be on Nepal? that will be great, but I would still be eagre to read you views on Mayawati. If you remember me a little, I am the one worried about Native Indians, more than anything else and according me Mayawati is a Native Indian, in fact, the only native Indian leader in India. So please, consider my suggestion, will you?
RE:Finally
by Prashanth on Apr 25, 2008 08:24 PM Permalink
What do you mean by native Indian? The only foreigner I am aware of in the govt is Sonia Gandhi.
Everyone is a foreigner in India if you go even further back in time. Even Dravidians are foreigners if you ask, I don't know, maybe some tribals who were in india before that. But anyway, why don't you be a little inclusive of people? Strange!
RE:Finally
by Manjula A on Apr 26, 2008 12:18 PM Permalink
There are various kinds of Indians, like Aryan Indians, Anglo Indians, Portugese Indians, Italian Indians, Muslim Indians and Christian Indians. But then there are also some native Indians, whose forefathers have lived in this part of the world since the time man evolved from apes. They are very small in number. They have not come to this land from anywhere and don't know how to fight with others. They don't know how to demand and get dowry. they don't kill their daughters. They are not shrewd enough to deal with all these super intelligent races. They are dark in colour. They can't speak Sanskirit and English. They can't claim the land they've lived on for eternity as their land. They rather think they belong to this land. They have no power. They are fooled very easily by any politician, sometimes in the name of Garibi Hatao, sometimes in the name of rule by prolerariat, sometimes in the name of Ram, Allah and Jesus and sometimes in the name of Dravidianism. But they've always been the underdogs, for the past 3500 years, who are, just now, trying to get up and breath.
RE:Finally
by Sahadevan KK on Apr 25, 2008 02:54 PM Permalink
My dear comrade sister Manjula, I am very disappointed that you confuse a red-blooded comrade like me with a right-winger. How would you like it if I confused you with Jayalalitha? Your DMK blood would be on fire.
RE:Finally
by Manjula A on Apr 25, 2008 03:01 PM Permalink
Don't you know anything about the stupid politicians, be that pinkos or the so calle Dravidian parties? Try and read a little more other than the messages under your own Article Rajeev. Read others' articles too.
RE:Finally
by Sahadevan KK on Apr 25, 2008 02:40 PM Permalink
My dear sister Manjula, Rajeev has been talking about his views on the nuclear deal for a long time. Strangely enough, we comrades are he agree on this. Must ask Beijing for what to do.
RE:Finally
by Manjula A on Apr 25, 2008 02:45 PM Permalink
Rajeev, you have been writing about the deal but never actually expressed your views clearly before. You seemed to be hating the pinkos so you were just a little ashamed of supporting them on this. Good that you finally got the guts to say what you felt. Whether China paid you any amount along with paying the stupid pinkos is another matter altogether. I am happy that atleast uncle Sam doesn't pay you.
