Nehru dynasty and his favourit general, the wicked Paul is the culprit here. Nehru's bad karma while seeking empty fame: 1. tried to stretch India's border too deep inside without any fall-back plan. 2. It's favourite General, Kaul didn't knew how to fight as his sole experience in WW-II was to entertain British troops. 3. India, under Kaul did not utilize it's air-force fearing Chinese air-power. In reality only India had air-field close to China border, a big big plus. Had India utilized it's air-force, the Indo-China war would have been something to be proud of.
It's time the youth takes over Indian politices, other wise God save India. Out PM should into his 50s and not 70s, at the most. Look at MACRO LEVEL and Narendra Modi is the perfect candidate.
Unity within Diversity. United we win, Divided we lose.
RE:Nehru, the culprit
by Aquarius on May 08, 2008 07:03 AM Permalink
Rahul Gandhi is the youngest and fittest candidate. Modi at 50 years is another old bandicoot who the indian youth do not want.
RE:Nehru, the culprit
by sundararajan Rajeshkumar on Apr 18, 2008 10:41 AM Permalink
Hey mahendra,Chinese stabbed India in the back for which we are still suffering.I looked at the MACRO LEVEL how can Narendra modi will fit as he is very much communal.Advani is already ruled out because he is spineless.Deva Gowda is perfect fit because he will sleep all the time the problems India facing will die the natural death.
RE:Nehru, the culprit
by Mahavir on Apr 26, 2008 07:52 AM Permalink
Sundarajan, Don;t go by English Media propoganda. Has Modi fought an election on Caste base or relegion base ? Does he pamper particular community ?Does he give any plump position to his MLA's like chairman of some organisation - which is noraml way of rewarding MLAs ? Have you tried to find out about the development/progress he has made in Gujarat Does he play politics based on minorty appeasement ? For him all citizens are equal. Do ou know the meaning of 'Communal' - if not then learn from Congress.
RE:RE:Nehru, the culprit
by Aquarius on May 08, 2008 07:05 AM Permalink
narendra Modi was responsible for the planned gujarat pogrom where thousands died and so he is ruled out as a nationalist leader.
RE:Nehru, the culprit
by mahendra sapa on Apr 21, 2008 08:24 PM Permalink
Narendra Modi is a nationalist and development oriented personality. He can and will work with any Indian who considers him/herself, an Indian first then whatever religion they have. It's proven that he is a very good administrator and India needs such administrator. Also, one should look at statistical #s on communal riots before pointing fingers. Congress, pre-Independence were very castiest and communal party. They were unable to tolerate a muslim, Jinnah as India's PM, hence the partition of India and the riots. These is long story, but the point I'm trying to make is, what you heard about Gujarat in 2000 (ages ago) was just an abberation.
RE:Nehru, the culprit
by Get Educated on Apr 17, 2008 11:32 PM Permalink
Hey Mahendra .. I dont know who you are .. but you have done great research and yes all that you have said is 100 % true. Nehru did not anticipate a war and did not even increase military spendings, inspite of warnings by intelligence for a possible war, what was too ridiculous was that, china had already constructed a highway in the disputed Aksai chin area between Tibet and Xinjiang and Indian government did not even know it. Nehru's govt realized the road construction only when communist party leader Moa humiliated Nehru by saying the Aksin Chin still belongs to India. Kaul was a brainless man, in a higly mountainous terrain like Arunachal pradesh, he allowed the chinese troops to occupy the mountain peaks/ high terrain with ease and he was fighting them from deep down valley. Absolutely lack of military acumen. No doubt we lost 3500 men while china lost only 1400 (not due to Indian army, but bcos of freezing cold at high altitude).
WHEN CHINESE INVADES INDIA THEN THIS TIME WEST INDIAN MUMBAI WILL BE IN CHINA , RAJ THAKCERAY , BAL THACKERAY AND THEIR CROONIES WILL BE SELLING JHUNKA BHAKAR , VADA PAO , MISAL AND USAL PAO IN CHINESE MUMBAI. HA HA AND THE BHAIYYAS WILL BE MILKING CHINESE BHAISAS , GUJJUS WILL BE EATING CHINESE DHOKLAS AND FARTING CHINSES STYLE PO PO PO THIN THAN THAN , MARWADIS WILL BE USING CHINESE SHITTING GEAR WHICH USES MINIMUM WATER, EAST INDIAN BANGLAS WILL BE EATING TOFU FISH , BIHARIS WILL BE WORKING FOR CHINESE RAILWAYS , ORIYAS WILL BE MAKING CHINSES PAINTING
Mr.Yeshi makes his point clear in his message.see for yourself" Yes Tibetans were leaving for For their home land when your coward govt. stoped them by doing that,by saying that the Tibetans don't carry any visa to enter Tibet.Now if u want to return to india, do u need a visa?And don't think that Tibetans r feed by your so called democratic regime.They have their own govt.in exile,who looks after the needy people.d more over you call the Tibetans a refugee but have u ever seen a Tibetan begger on the indian street?People who find Tibetans a burden,go & complain to ur ancestors who tied themselves with Tibetans.When Tibetans enetred India and was welcomed by your so called papa Nheru & his govt.They were given pure golds and & preciouse stones.Tibetans didn't come here empty handed.& the indian govt.in return gave some land in the mountains where no human lived there,they were setteld in forest & in woods.The Tibetans made their own colony with their hard work,they even built schools for their childrens.Because of Tibetans many indians started making business by also settling next to Tibetans for their earnings.Before,Dharamsala was a mountain full of forest where there used to be even bears and wild animals.So study the history of TIbet & then comment. & now by saying go Tibetans go back!It's not so easy buddy as it sounds.If the Indian govt.officially announces that Tibetans should leave india.It is more easy for the
RE:Mr.Yeshi makes his point clear!Tibetans devloped Dharmshal it was a dense forest and worth inhabitable!EVEN TIBETANS ARE NOT REFIGEES THE MESSAGE SAYS
by mahabodhi on Apr 17, 2008 09:33 PM Permalink
Contd. It's not so easy buddy as it sounds.If the Indian govt.officially announces that Tibetans should leave india.It is more easy for the Tibetans to go any where US,UK,Canada,Holland,France & Australia.Because Tibetans are already officiay accepted here,othe ."....cuzo! Tibetans were leaving but ur black ass dhoti govt.stoped them by returning to their homeland" U sound quite threatening!So that's Tibet History!If vietnamese can fight World Power USA and kick them out of their their land Why did Tibetans could not do so!U r ready to go to WEST US FRANCE HOLLAND AUSTRALIA BUT NOT to Tibet !we definetly would like to learn more of the Tibet history mr .Yeshi!Your messges is quite ENLIGHTENING!Tomorrow even Bangladeshi may say the same things that they made their own colonies!Your message is eye opener indeed!
RE:Mr.Yeshi makes his point clear!Tibetans devloped Dharmshal it was a dense forest and worth inhabitable!EVEN TIBETANS ARE NOT REFIGEES THE MESSAGE SAYS
by balraj joshi on Apr 18, 2008 04:14 PM Permalink
I am surprised how people can make such statment without knowing much.Tibetans are everywhere in India. I come from a small town near shimla which has a good Tibetan population. The place where they were accomodated was not a jungle but an area as developed as ours. True that they were not provided with villas but saying that they were not treated well would not be correct.I had many Tibetans as my class fellows. On their part, Tibetans integrated beautifully with the local populace despite a huge difference in our and their custom,cuisine, attire and even pets. Today some of these Tibetans are respectable members of our society and are richer than many of us. Last year only we bought two plots from these very Tibetans. Saying that they could reach these standards without the support of Indian Government and locals like us would not be a fair statement.
RE:ELSE INDIA WILL BEGIN FROM HIMACHAL PRADESH IN NORTH
by prashant suryawanshi on Apr 18, 2008 10:15 AM Permalink
Abbe murthy.....desh ki borders pe Jatt,matratha aur rajput hi ladh rahe hai.
Come on,use ur commen sense,If China,Pak,Burma and Nepal gets united against India,U think the Western world will keep shut and watch?Hell no! What r united nations for?Such thing can never happen to India.So stop imagining things.And people who r writting here that China is more powerfull an India,don't believe them because they r chinese commenting here as Indians.Khauff bharna chahte hain.
RE:use your commen sense!
by mahabodhi on Apr 17, 2008 08:03 PM Permalink
Then why did West punished china when it took Tibet that too long nearly 50 years ago when china was not even VETO power!Where was UN then!Ansd please do not worry about India!India is capable of defending itself!But the plain truth is Refugee Tibetans are not intersted to go to Tibet as the conditions there are harsh and Tibetans Refugees are Comfortable living in UA ,Canada,West and India where they are well settled and doing good busines!Selling Chinese products and even mostly Resraunts specilising in Chinese Cuisine!See their Banners ONLY AUTHENTIC CHINESE CUISINE" !Aftyer living in India for 50 years how come u do not know Indian Cuisines !And where do u learn Chinese Cooking!Thr Tibetans are using Real Tibetans who are being oppressed by Chinese and garnering Sympathy for themselves -Refugee Tibetans- to retain permenent refugee Status!All they want is Financial Grants from UN ,US and West!this is the truth and ultimate truth dear Yeshi!Time will prove the real credentials of the Refugee Tibetans!
RE:use your commen sense!
by Nirpinder Singh on Apr 17, 2008 08:20 PM Permalink
Hmmm! You have a point there. Some of what you say may be explained by the fact that the Tibetans in India have to make a living. Most of them are poor and survice by maitaining mobile shops. The goods that they sell are mostly from China. Since Tibet is not a big manufacturing nation therefore they survive by procuring Chinese goods. But the point still remains. They are anti Chinese so why promote Chinese economic hegemony by trading in goods from China? Why not promote Tibetan handicrafts or Tibetan medicine or something that is authentically Tibetan?
Tibetans r never tired of calling India their 2nd home,& then the same people disgrace them by saying TIbetans r burden.Every Tibetans who r born here & hold a citizenship,they all pay there taxes & etc.And now when a bit of pressure came from china,toh apna rang dikhana shuru kardiya!Wah wah kya baat hai!Where as TIbetans call this soil as their 2nd home so they learn Tibetan & hindi first and then english in the Tibetan schools,and then u call the Tibetans a burden?Wow,very good.India & Tibet share a very special & unique bond which China can never replace Tibet.Sport is not more important than humanity,infact nothing is more important than humanity.By making a plan to take the torch to the Tibet's himalayan mountains,they have already made it a political issue.So also stop saying don't mix sports with politics.
RE:sports is not more important than humanity!
by mahabodhi on Apr 17, 2008 07:48 PM Permalink
Well said Yeshi!Tibetans may call india their second home but now it is their permenent home!Write after 50 years!
It is indeed an anomaly that the Indian Government is so eager to recognize the control of the Chinese Government over Tibet. By doing so what India is doing is akin to inviting a hungry tiger into one's home. That is it is a very dangerous proposition indeed. China lays claim to Tibet since it formed part of the historical Chinese Empire ruled over by the Mongolian Khans. This is untenable. Since the Mongolian Empire does not exist its constituent states should be free to go their own way. However India has not had the foresight to think in this way. Leaving aside Tibet India shares a very small portion of its border with China. However now we have the Chinese Army right on our borders threatening Kashmir on one side and Arunachal Pradesh on the other. We are likewise chary about raising our voice over human rights issues in Pakistan occupied Kashmir. Pakistan seeks to talk about the Indian portion of Jammu and Kashmir but it has not granted any freedom to Kashmiris on its side of the border. Why do we not bring Pakistan to the mat on this issue in the international fora?