Ramayan when seen through the eyes of darwin would certainly conclude the scientific underpinnings of its history because the existence of Hanuman is a proof of transitional form between monkey and man.
RE:Scientific proof for evolution
by duraimurugan on Apr 15, 2008 12:25 AM Permalink
mmmm,not exactly because there were also Jadauu are you going to claim they are transitional forms between brid and man? Instead of analyzing like this we can treat yt as a good story and take some moral lesson from Ramanayana
Lie, deceit, propaganda and false gods and prophets are part of Kali Yuga and they will be victorious in this era. As described in ancient hindu text books truth and virtue is only 25%. So is are the humans with virtue, truth and honesty.
75% of the total human population have the bad qualities mentioned above. It is quiet natural they will dominate. Truth and virtue will never survive till the end of this Kali Yuga which is going to last another 424000 years.
RE:Era of Kali
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:27 AM Permalink
i promise not to abuse (or rather speak the truth ) about muhammed, if u stop posting ! u can see - ihave never posted any slang till u came along
RE:I will become Galileo of Hinduism
by Julius on Apr 15, 2008 12:14 AM Permalink
How can pedoMo do that being so old and ug1y to that lil underage gal Aisha?
RE:My Dear Bhakto !
by Julius on Apr 15, 2008 12:13 AM Permalink
In my mind i am thinking how pedoMo deflowered that lil gal Aisha? How can he do that being so old and ug1y to that lil underage gal?
RE:My Dear Bhakto !
by Julius on Apr 15, 2008 12:16 AM Permalink
No actually, ur mama locked u up with diaper because she was scared that u might do the same what pedoMo did to his first old wife when he was a teenager.
RE:RE:My Dear Bhakto !
by Eternal Sunshine on Apr 18, 2008 07:32 PM Permalink
Can you teach us the science of Koran? What was there before Mohammed came (which wasnt long back)?
RE:RE:Was Ram a Yadav i.e. OBC?
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:13 AM Permalink
WHY DONT U ASK THAT TO YOUR PROFET ? USKA TO BAHUT DUM THA - BABY AYESHA, DAUGHTER-I-LAW ZAINAB, AUNT KHADIJA, SEXSLAVE RUBINA SABKO HANDLE KARTA THA
RE:Was Ram a Yadav i.e. OBC?
by Julius on Apr 14, 2008 11:57 PM Permalink
ok "Ha ha hi hi" At last u could not resist showing ur true color! Where's Aisha? Pedo Mo got the poor girl half-finished?
RE:Was Ram a Yadav i.e. OBC?
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:01 AM Permalink
@MC NO ONE IS ABUSING ISLAM HERE , SO PLEASE DONT POLLUTE THE DISCUSSION WITH ABUSES ... if anyone counters with bad names for your prophet, u will be responsible
RE:RE:RE:Was Ram a Yadav i.e. OBC?
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:10 AM Permalink
profet? yeh kya hota hain ? does that mean a popat who makes u all screw 6 year olds, marry daughter-in-laws for his own profit ? apne aise profet ko lekar porkiland chala jaa
RE:Was Ram a Yadav i.e. OBC?
by Julius on Apr 15, 2008 12:02 AM Permalink
Go and ask ur mom, why she named u like that. If she hasn't then she wud be glad to see the culture her son has imbibed.
RE:Was Ram a Yadav i.e. OBC?
by ks sk on Apr 14, 2008 11:57 PM Permalink
u dumbo at that time the people were divided on the basis of work that they did and not on religion as is done now
RE:Was Ram a Yadav i.e. OBC?
by abcd abcd on Apr 15, 2008 12:02 AM Permalink
Well okay, then what about the descendants of Ram today? Are they buffalo headring peons fighting for reservations?
