Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1147 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
----
by Ha ha hi hi on Apr 15, 2008 12:46 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

-

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:----
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:50 AM  Permalink
btwbtw, why do u hate brahmins ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:----
by bagawan swaroop on Apr 15, 2008 12:56 AM  Permalink
hi, No one hates brahmins... it is you guys hate us......Even the moderator is on ur side.....shame on our country and so called democracy

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:----
by Anindya Ghosh on Apr 15, 2008 12:57 AM  Permalink
bhagwan swaroop.....who are "US"?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:----
by bagawan swaroop on Apr 15, 2008 12:58 AM  Permalink
hindu non bramins

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Insult to tamils
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:46 AM  Permalink
this is a jehadi musaalmaan trying to create a rift between hindus !
he does not know that upanishads have contributions from many seminal tamil scholars !

spit on his quran - the terrorist manual

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Insult to tamils
by Ha ha hi hi on Apr 15, 2008 12:48 AM  Permalink
and ur a Brahmin who want to rule India by using it to maximan

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Insult to tamils
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:54 AM  Permalink
NO I AM NOT A BRAHMIN

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Insult to tamils
by bagawan swaroop on Apr 15, 2008 12:52 AM  Permalink
hi gyan buddy,
What was wrong in my statement?????????. north indians consider themselves the learned one....aryans superior race and south indians being dark skinned are considered ravanas and killed. king Ram killed king ravana. north indian aryan king killed south indian dark skinned ravana and you guys celeberate DIWALI. i think kalaingar shound ban DIWALI i south india.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Proving the historicity of Ram
by devendra tewari on Apr 15, 2008 12:37 AM  Permalink 

Fantastic research....Pls. convey my thanks to Author.

Devendra TEwari

    Forward  |  Report abuse
@ Gyan Vedi
by Ha ha hi hi on Apr 15, 2008 12:37 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Darwin proof for evolution of Man found its hanuman... evolution frm Monkey to Man

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:@ Gyan Vedi
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:43 AM  Permalink
is this proof conclusive enuff ?
whwre have i denied darwin btw ?

darwin theory has merits/demerits:
merits : shows theevolution from austrelopithecus to sapiens

demerits: not able to prove the reqd genetic mutations

U eed to know some science to figure out wat i m saying

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:@ Gyan Vedi
by Ha ha hi hi on Apr 15, 2008 12:51 AM  Permalink
Darwin says survival of the fittest... if Hanuman was so much strong built and fit why Monkey-Man has become extinct??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:@ Gyan Vedi
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:58 AM  Permalink
becuase Hanuman alone had those supernatural qualities ! (he was incarnation of shiva)
the rest did not have those qualities ...

btw, read up anthropology - there was a tribe called Vaynar in south india with primordial (apish) features - it can be logically concluded that Hanuman was part of such a race, everything is scientific if u dig deeper

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:@ Gyan Vedi
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:41 AM  Permalink
IS THAT CONCLUSIVE ENUFF ?
BTW, WHERE HAVE I DENIED DARWIN - ITS A THEORY WITH MERITS/DEMERITS !
advantage: it shows evolution from homo austrelopithecus to homo spaien
disadvantage: the required genetic mutations have been proved to be impossible ...

u need to know some science to figure out what i m saying

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:@ Gyan Vedi
by ks sk on Apr 15, 2008 12:43 AM  Permalink
U IDIOT WHAT THE AUTHOR SAID WAS THAT DARWINS THEORY IS FALSE" Many scientific journals had also published these discoveries but the mental block created by the evolution theory of Darwin and the limit of 5,000 years of human history did not pay due attention to the new discoveries. These scientific discoveries and facts prove that the history of mankind is billions of years old."

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Science proves Ram doesn't Exist and Faith tells it residues in Heart
by Anindya Ghosh on Apr 15, 2008 12:49 AM  Permalink
the proofs are in your mother's ass

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Science proves Ram doesn't Exist and Faith tells it residues in Heart
by Ha ha hi hi on Apr 15, 2008 12:56 AM  Permalink
learn science first and then comment!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Science proves Ram doesn't Exist and Faith tells it residues in Heart
by Ha ha hi hi on Apr 15, 2008 12:56 AM  Permalink
how come???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Science proves Ram doesn't Exist and Faith tells it residues in Heart
by K K on Apr 15, 2008 01:19 AM  Permalink
You moron! Did you read the article? Or are you so stupid you cannot read or understand?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:This is precisely why north Indians are lacking is law and order
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:34 AM  Permalink
and please enlighten without using slang as to what u found unscientific in the article ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:This is precisely why north Indians are lacking is law and order
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:36 AM  Permalink
PROOF OF RAM

Valmiki did not write Ramayan, he NARRATED it ... he was alive during the time of Ramayan, in fact Ram's sons - Luv and Kush were born in his ashrama , the Sage Valmiki met Ram, Sita, Hanuman - all the characters ...

Plus the proof of ram is all over India in the form of geographically annotated places like Ayodhya, Chitrakoot, Kishkinda, Rameswaram ...

(even Ram Setu - you should refer to the report by Geological Survey of India, which was presented before Madras High Court and it ruled that Ram Setu was man-made, in the Supreme Court WITHOUT ANY EXCAVATIONS, the ASI said it was natural - thus the controversy - anyway, new excavations will take place and the truth will prevail)

But since these events took place 6500 years ago (yes, recent astronomical studies pin-point the exact dates) people started identifying these as mythology more than History !

do u know there is a great controversy whether Jesus was born on 1 AD or 4 AD (So the farther back u go, the more blurred the details become)

But that does not take away the historicity of Ramayan or Mahabharat!

---------------------------
In fact there is more historical proof of Ram then there is of Prophet Abraham actually ever visiting Mecca to make the Kabbah (the VERY BASIS of haj) or for the fact that Adam and Eve ever lived or Muhammed went on a donkey to al aqsa


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:This is precisely why north Indians are lacking is law and order
by Ha ha hi hi on Apr 15, 2008 12:45 AM  Permalink
do eve and adam ever exist.. ok lets say muhammed exist but was is Prophet???... Why is Ramsethu not floating over water.. How come Ram and Sita flew back to ahodhya on aeroplane... how come Hanuman flew in air??? if Ram was God why did he conducted Agnipariksha??? why RAM has done to general public??? Defended people or saved his wife??? why his children were abandoned... if wife is to be blamed what is child fault???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:This is precisely why north Indians are lacking is law and order
by Amar Desai on Apr 15, 2008 12:57 AM  Permalink
why did allah selected a man who fought 53 battle as aggression, enjoyed sex slaves name one messanger i history who enjoyed and told his followers to njoy sex slaves? why would allah select sucha person as messanger, if allah is almighty.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:This is precisely why north Indians are lacking is law and order
by Ha ha hi hi on Apr 15, 2008 12:38 AM  Permalink
i have never used slang.. if i have plz post

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:This is precisely why north Indians are lacking is law and order
by Amar Desai on Apr 15, 2008 12:59 AM  Permalink
ha ha hi hi, if u will come donw to logic u'll have toexplaing 1000000 zillion human rights violation in1400 years, teri chaddi phat jayegi explain kartekare

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Guys stop this nonsense
by duraimurugan on Apr 15, 2008 12:28 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Some genius here have expalined the existence of hanuman is a proof for the transitional form between Monkey and Man.These kind of analysis is embarrasing.Because there were also Jadauu is that Guy going to claim they are transitional forms between brid and man?
Instead of analyzing like this we can treat yt as a good story and take some moral lesson from Ramanayana.
What do you say?



    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Guys stop this nonsense
by ks sk on Apr 15, 2008 12:41 AM  Permalink
you have got it wrong murugan ...your entire history is manufactured by the British .

Just Google Forbidden Archeology by Michael cremo ..u will find the answers!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Guys stop this nonsense
by Amar Desai on Apr 15, 2008 12:54 AM  Permalink
problem with ppl like murgan is theirancestral poverty, weak genes, i am sure he has taken money and accepted christanity.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Guys stop this nonsense
by Sriram on Apr 15, 2008 12:48 AM  Permalink
O yeah DMK croonies like you will not understand history .So get back to wearing your darkglasses and act blind.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:RE:@ GYAN VEDI (with zero Knowledge)
by Gyan Vedi on Apr 15, 2008 12:31 AM  Permalink
i promise not to abuse (or rather speak the truth ) about muhammed, if u stop posting !
u can see - i have never posted any slang till u came along


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 1147 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Write a message