Western leaders and journalists are pretending not to know the fact that Pakistan-SaudiArabia-UAE are the centre of World terrorism. Saddam Hussain stood against this Pak-Saudi terrorism and has paid the price; his country was reduced to the stone age. Thus, there is a close links between the Western countries and terrorism as they are pouring on billions and billions to Pakistan and supplying every kind of most advanced weapons to Pakistan-SaudiArabia and UAE. The Western countries destroyed Yugoslavia, a secular anti-Muslim countries to create Muslim countries like Bosnia and Kosovo and then now financing another fanatic Muslim country Albania, who has close links with China for the last 60 years. However, Western countries do not want to do anything against Pakistan. That means they really do not want to do anything against Taliban which was created by Clinton in 1995 or against Al-Queada which was created Reagan during the 1980s or against Muzzahideens which was created by Carter in 1978 to occupy Afghanistan indirectly through Pakistan. Britain gave citizenship to the Chechen terrorists. The Prime-Minister of Kosovo who made millions by exporting human organs after kidnapping and killing Serbians in hundreds is now a very respectable ally of the West. War on Teror is just a myth created by USA to occupy more and more countries to have permanent military bases there. Australians are servants of thec Americans. Half of Australia is now owned by the Chinese. Thus,
Perhaps they should leave Pakistan and use Uzbekistan. It doesn't take much to see that Pakistan is a victim of terrorism iteslf. Remove Pakistan and the USA and NATO can't do much in Afghanistan. Pakistan is the lynchpin. If the world knows this, don't the Al-Qaeda and the taliban know this?
Some liberals are despicable. Rudd doesnt want to sell uranium to India becasue of that high falutin ideal known as non-proliferation and that stupid western creation called NPT. But he is more than willing to grovel before China. His recent temerity to criticize China came only after several commentators found him to be pro-China, mandarin and all. He had to show some balls and so when he went to China he spoke about Tibet etc.
RE:shameful liberals
by Dipak Bose on Apr 13, 2008 05:17 PM Permalink
Rupert Murdock, who owns almost all newspapers and TV stations in the English speaking world ( including out Star channels) at the age of 80 recently married to a 20 years old possible Chinese agent. Thus, no Western politicians can afford to be anti-Chinese unless he wants to commit political suicide. This is also true about Indian politicians who are all purchased by Chinese money.
Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has criticised Pakistan for not doing enough to stem the flow of arms and support to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda [Images] across its borders into Afghanistan where more than 1000 Australian troops are based.Before meeting Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf [Images] in China on Friday night, Rudd said he understood the South Asian country's difficulties in the fight against terrorism but concerns have been mounting in its fight against terrorism.
"Together with other members of the international community, I do have concerns about the level of co-operation on behalf of the Government of Pakistan in the overall effort against terrorism in Afghanistan," he said.
The prime minister said he had specific proposals for Pakistan to improve co-operation in the fight against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
The new civilian and military strategy in Afghanistan, which was endorsed at the NATO meeting, would be incomplete without the full co-operation of surrounding states including Pakistan, he said on the last day of his four-day visit to China.
Pakistan would be engaged in the efforts of the United States and its allies in Afghanistan in a 'difficult and protracted war', he said, adding, "I am concerned at the extent to which in recent months that co-operation has become less than it could otherwise be."
Pakistan is an Islamic Republic, what do you expect from them other than hatred or terrorism? For 40 years ISI have been funding terrorism into India. Australia had some big d**k at those time? Only if U.S. says something, AUS will support it and second it. Say something innovative.
How can a nation established in the name of terrorist cult can fight terrorism?they are destined to make terrorists to fight Al-Jihad all over the world..nothing is going to change them, not even US money bags...
The earlier the "FIRST" world learns about "Pak not doing ANYTHING AT ALL to fight terror, instead using the alms for further terrorist" activities" The better off the whole world will be..
RE:Pak not doing enough to fight terror: Aus
by Sacha Hindustani on Apr 12, 2008 03:38 PM Permalink
I think the first world knows that Pakistan has done nothing at all for the global fight against Islamic Terrorism except fighting only for its own benefits,example Balochistan. But the first world leaders can only request Pakistan to do more because Bush has given so much money already and much more in the pipeline that if they straight away accuse pakistan of doing nothing, back home their strategy towards pakistan would be considered as a failure. This war is going on since 7 years now, Ho long does it take to destroy bunch of brainless ideots(terrorists) hiding in the mountains along the border of Pak-Afghan and the whole world including pak knows abt it...
