Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 57 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Inter-caste marriages
by usa on Apr 15, 2008 06:16 PM  Permalink 

India must have reservations till 85% of marriages are inter-caste.

Till then,
Vote for candidates from YOUR caste only.
Do not care if he is corrupt or competent.

And watch the magic...


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Makes recruitment easy
by Indori Baba on Apr 11, 2008 07:54 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

All of SC/ST/OBC and forward caste like brahmins are losers. Here is why:
(1)For SC/ST their share of pie has gotten smaller. Now they will have to compete with OBCs. And it is the OBCs that oppress dalits not brahmins. Mayawati raised the same point during elections. OBCs include bhumihars, yadavs and Jats they oppress dalits more as these people hold real power in villages not the temple priest.
(2) Forward caste are now openly dicriminated against. There is no reason for them to love India anymore. They should start looking to move to countries like US/Canada.
(3) OBCs just got branded as backwards. I was just talking to recruiter here in US who recruits from IITs/IIMs. He told me point blank, more reservation means his job of recruitment becomes easy. For ex, earlier he had to interview tons of people in IITs and IIMs, now he says he just has to pick from top 50%. For the rest of the needs they would go to second tier schools. Because that is where the "next best" who could not make it IIT/IIM went. He said point blank, IIT/IIM teach from same books as any other college. The difference in students is the difficult entrance. Because we know someone clearing that without any reservation is good by default. We hire from IIT/IIMs just for same reason, otherwise even a Jaunpur MBA has same syllabus and curriculum and books. So OBCs still won't be hired.
No need to worry as talent gets discovered anyhow.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Makes recruitment easy
by krishnakanth on Apr 11, 2008 08:25 AM  Permalink
How u justify bhramins are loosers?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Makes recruitment easy
by jde dump on Apr 11, 2008 11:14 PM  Permalink
No doubt, it is a bad news for majority. But dont mind dude, the reasoning given by u looks pretty immature .. the opinion given by u looks pretty much similar to those hold by aspirant of a premier institutes.
If u see practically, almost none of the recruiter gives a huge weightage to how u got ur admit in the insti. ... all they look is how u performed in their test and how u were performing during the course. I myself am from a premier institues and have my colleagues from almost all of the top institutes of the country. But nobody has ever encountered any such situation in their respective colleges where somebody was rejected or not shortlisted bcoz he/she got admit from category. If somebody has performed good while studying in the institute, he is definitely preferred for recruitment over somebody who performed bad during the course but was one of the top ranker in the entrance test. I accept that a performer in the entrance test will most probably be a performer in class as well .. but it is not true in all cases. Taking a batch of a good institute which is already following this quota system, you will find maximum good performers from general category but the no. of cadidates from reserved category who are performing equally good is not small to be ignored too.
The person who told u that he'll now recruit only from 50% of the ppl from premier institues, cannot be a real decsion maker in recruitment ... bcoz if he would be he would never say that .. it can b

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Makes recruitment easy
by jde dump on Apr 11, 2008 11:17 PM  Permalink
it can be nothing but his personal opinion abt what he want to do in such situation. Have u ever seen any recruiter coming to a camus and picking up only genaral category and ignoring reserved category outrightly. No they do not because they have their own tests which will filter ppl once again .. and if a reserved category candidate is able to perform better than a general category guy, recruiter has full right to prefer that candidate only as he performed better in a test which is customized to the recruiter's requirement while the another one performed better in a general test(whose significance cannot be denied but is definitely given a second place bcoz of not being customized to the employer)

So no need to be complacent .. it is indeed a setback to all aspirants as there is substantial stuff to lose.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Students
by khan on Apr 10, 2008 08:07 PM  Permalink 

Actually students are just not required by any political party. Hence this judgement. We are responsible because we never vote.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
SC
by khan on Apr 10, 2008 08:07 PM  Permalink 

For the past few years SC had given some really good judgement. But this particular one has killed the judiciary.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
AAM ADMI
by khan on Apr 10, 2008 08:06 PM  Permalink 

It's better to provide reservation to AAM ADMI.
Let see what guidlines or criteria does our politicians or the supreme court lays down.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
India is democracy.... and NOT 'meritocracy' like Singapore.
by usa on Apr 10, 2008 05:02 PM  Permalink 

Hence it is imperative to maintain 'cultural' aka 'caste' diversity in all temples in India.

Government of India should implement 'reservations' in all Indian temples as per the 'caste' census in India.

1. 52% of all temple staff including Pujaris should be from OBC communities.
2. 29% temple staff including Pujaris should be from Dalits and Tribals.
3. Remaining all temple staff including Pujaris should be from other castes.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Tagged fellas
by Narayan on Apr 10, 2008 04:33 PM  Permalink 

What I feel is we should tag each and every RICH student/employee came thru quota and let that isolation never fade. this way v can make them realize how bad is quota for the country and for their community's truly deserving ones.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Amit Mishra- do you represent IIPM?
by sethumadhavan menon on Apr 10, 2008 04:32 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Well well well very funny the way you keep talking about IIPM.May I know what is your qualification & what gives you the right to comment about IIM & other premium B.School passouts? You mean all those who joined IIPM in the last 5 years have actually rejected IIM offers- I think you are really joking big time.I would really like to know how many people would actually crack CAT/XAT and still join IIPM or for that matter any non premier B.School.So please take a reality check done dude.Dont try to mislead others unnecessarily

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Amit Mishra- do you represent IIPM?
by amit mishra on Apr 10, 2008 04:52 PM  Permalink
no pun intended.
thats what they imply by thinking beyond iim. Anyways, none in his right senses would leave an iim to join iipm, despite the tall claims. and i hope "others" here dont get misled by the claims etal.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Amit Mishra- do you represent IIPM?
by gautam on Apr 10, 2008 05:04 PM  Permalink

thanks for your clarification.
you are not a fool then.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Amit Mishra- do you represent IIPM?
by amit mishra on Apr 10, 2008 05:13 PM  Permalink
thanks for the certification mate. Anyways regds to packages, don u think its a bit misleading number, and an open forum may not be an appropriate place to spill the beans. :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
We are ready with bermuda(s). Are you ready?
by narayan on Apr 10, 2008 04:29 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

We are ready with bermuda(s). Are you ready?

In Khaki, people may recognise us, bermuda is okay...

Our big leaders are trying to escape from all criminal cases.

Do not try to kill others, try to Run, Run, Run very fast.

Fold your flags slowly and run very fast.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:We are ready with bermuda(s). Are you ready?
by raj pv on Apr 10, 2008 04:32 PM  Permalink
This fellow gone mad. You can't run from your shadow.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 57 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message