Raj Thackeray may be the nephew of Bal Thackeray but the idiocy of that blood line runs through in his vein as well and, in fact he is far more vicious and worse for the Indian national security than his Uncle.
Such idiots should be asked to leave the country right away! Or better still just move the Bollywood out of Bombay. It will do many things:
1. De-congest Mumbai, so the residents can be happier! 2. Bollywood can do with a more open space and the studios can get better and cheaper access to supplies and real estate - leading to lower cost of making movies. 3. The new struggling actors will no longer have to sleep on the railway stations because they cannot afford the rent. They can rent apartments at Rs 2000 per month between 2-3 guys. 4. We as India would not have all the eggs - finance, bollywood, soft industries - in one place. It is, in any case, not conducive to India's National Interest.
Unless we Indians cannot get this unity thing pat down we will never be able to proceed. Many years back, Chanakya went from one to another to ask the Kings to ask them to come together. But they threw him out. He vowed to not tie his hair until he could put them out of business. I have said many times now, we do not and did not need a Gandhi today or in the last 100 years, we need and needed all along a Chanakya! Someone who can vow to get these foolish and vicious people "out of business"!
RE:This is gimmick to please not the marathi manus but the idiot Thakreys
by Niraj Kumar on Apr 08, 2008 10:14 AM Permalink
Contd.....If Amitabh Bachchan has guts and intelligence he will not only stand up to this guy - not necessarily through Amar Singh brigade - on his OWN and bring him down.Such people hallucinate a lot - they start believing in their own invincibility. Give them a shock and they melt away. We need someone to stand up to them.
RE:This is gimmick to please not the marathi manus but the idiot Thakreys
by heramb gude on Apr 08, 2008 10:51 AM Permalink
We need to stand up not to Raj or Bal Thackeray as you say.Simply Raj has just given vent to the pent-up fury that is burning inside umpteen no. of people in Maharashtra.The real issue is the unchecked migration from UP/Bihar to not just Maharashtra but to even other comparatively industrialised states like Gujarat.The population explosion together with lack of suitable employment opportunities thanks to the incompetence of local UP/Bihar politicians in developing a suitable climate to attract investment in their states has precipitated this migration that has been adversely affecting the infrastructure in Maha/Guj and fuelling resentment for UP/Biharis amon the local populace.This crucial issue-more a social is conveniently cloaked by the electronic media under the guise of showing Raj's campaign as a personal attack on Amitabh
RE:This is gimmick to please not the marathi manus but the idiot Thakreys
by Amitesh Raghavan on Apr 08, 2008 11:12 AM Permalink
Issue is not the migration, and also migration cannot and should not be checked in any means within the country......The Milloin dollar question is if UP/Bihar is not developed then why other states people come together and help them to get developed, being in India then what Mahatastra has done for India and India's national pride......You guys talk about people from other states in mahatashtra contibution.....Then we the people of India ask from Maharashtra.....What Maharashtra is doing to contribute to India and Indians as a whole (Here we are not talking conribution only for Maharashtra)????????......First contribute to whole India.....then we southIndians and rest of Indians will accept Maharshtra as an true Indian state.
RE:This is gimmick to please not the marathi manus but the idiot Thakreys
by heramb gude on Apr 08, 2008 11:17 AM Permalink
I am not talking about Maharashtra in particular but indicating to you that UP/Bihar are proving to be the proverbial millstones around the country.maharashtra contributes to the country more than what you contend and may I ask why should we as Marathis look for accpetance from whom you r calling Indians.If Indians do not want to accept that Marathis are Indians too,so be it.We would be happy to have Maharashtra as a separate country outside what you refer to as your India.Thank you very much.
RE:RE:This is gimmick to please not the marathi manus but the idiot Thakreys
by heramb gude on Apr 08, 2008 11:22 AM Permalink
R u really an Indian,when u r pointing fingers at Tamils and Marathis,it clearly demonstrates that you have as much a regionalistic attitude as much as I am showing on this message board.I am accepting that the hatred of Indians towards Marathis has made me accept a regional bias against my own conscience.Do you,Mr Amitesh, have the guts to admit that your thoughts too indicate you regional chauvinism.In ur reply you have called urself an Indian but your thoughts tell another story.Mind you,there is nothing personal in it as we don't even know each other to judge each other entirely
Rajni has audience only among tamil speaking people mostly from Tamil Nadu. So it is natural that he speaks tamil and he supports Tamil Nadu. But for Amitabh, eventhough he is in Mumbai, only because Bollywood is in Mumbai. his audience is there all over india and mainly his audience is hindi speaking people not marathi speaking people.
RE:Rajni and Amitabh cannot be compared
by lavanya on Apr 08, 2008 09:56 AM Permalink
rajnikant has qudience from whole south and bachhan from north that only the difference.
RE:Rajni and Amitabh cannot be compared
by heramb gude on Apr 08, 2008 10:58 AM Permalink
Mr Amitesh,it is only when all linguistic states ranging from Punjab to Kerala,Tamilnadu to Assam,West Bengal to Maharashtra that linguistic need to unite and oppose the hegemonistic tendencies displayed by the Hindi-bhashi on the strength of demonstrating that Hindi has the status of national language.UP/Biharis tend to believe that they own the country and can have their way wherever they migrate and knowing the local language or understanding the local culture is not really their necessity.It is only when they see and realise that their designs hidden under the garb of promoting national integration is dangerous to national unity in general
RE:Rajni and Amitabh cannot be compared
by vijay baskar on Apr 08, 2008 09:55 AM Permalink
Let them speak in any language . You first make sure you speak proper english.
You can speak in any lanugage and stay anywhere in the world as long as you understand the language of the place in this liberalised world. Now what happened in Maharashtra is only a personal vendetta intiated by some crooked and selifish politicians and no local Maharashtrains are supporting this to happen in their sacred land. What happened in Maharashtra and the present level confusion and mistrust which was created by these so-called lovers of local languaage, is for the creation of a new militant political outfit who wants to get some mileage and get some seats in Legislative Assemblies and in Parliament - i.e. the corridor of power. These leaders have no love left on oridinary local people but only use them and throw away after using like KADIPATHA. These leaders are poisonous snakes and these snakes should be given their places by the people of Maharashtra. It seems that from the intiail HULLABOL, there was little confusion amoung locals, but it went and we are sure that if once repeated it, local people will give befitting response the perpetrators of the violance and hatred creating among the brotherns / humans living in their locality. However, we are surprised about the laws of Maharashtra where local police is unable to do any actions against illegal activities of this hatred leaders and why they are not taking strict actions so far? Are they leave this to the Public and expect the people should take law into their own hands? There is too much to be done in the lo
RE:IT IS NOT THE LANGUAGE, BUT THE ATTITUDE OF CORRUPTED LEADERS TO CHANGE!!!
by lavanya on Apr 08, 2008 10:00 AM Permalink
every people from maharashtra supports and support anti maharashtra fight. then their will be no mercy for any bachhan or mulayam or lalu
RE:IT IS NOT THE LANGUAGE, BUT THE ATTITUDE OF CORRUPTED LEADERS TO CHANGE!!!
by Sunil Bhatiya on Apr 08, 2008 10:11 AM Permalink
Bahut katili nachaniya hai .... Are ooo chamiya jara humko bhi dikha do 2 4 thumke ...
RE:IT IS NOT THE LANGUAGE, BUT THE ATTITUDE OF CORRUPTED LEADERS TO CHANGE!!!
by milind sabnis on Apr 08, 2008 09:03 AM Permalink
Amitabh Bacchan has become a political icon for UP/Biharis in Mumbai by his close proximity to UP politicians like Amar Singh and Mulayam Singh.
Amar Singh and Mulayam Singh are cultivating a vote bank of Hindi speaking migrants in Mumbai.
RE:the concept of nationhod is lost by milind sabnis on Apr 07, 2008 11:16 PM
The mistake my dear friend, Amitabh made is by listening to his friend Amar Singh.
Amar Singh is a politician who has vested interest in creating a vote-bank of Hindi-speaking migrants in Mumbai with the aim of gaining political power in Maharashtra.
Amitabh Bachan listened to his friend Amar Singh and became a "UP Brand Ambassador" and made ads like "UP mein jurm kum hain"
Any ordinary person, then is bound to think that Amitabh Bacchan is taking a political stand and that's where the problem lies.
Indulge in politics and expect politicans from the other end of the spectrum to counter you.
RE:RE:IT IS NOT THE LANGUAGE, BUT THE ATTITUDE OF CORRUPTED LEADERS TO CHANGE!!!
by Tanmay on Apr 08, 2008 10:27 AM Permalink
for u Raj and Bala are saint? Jago mere bhai
RE:Does this gesture does not come from heart?
by milind sabnis on Apr 08, 2008 09:01 AM Permalink
Amitabh Bacchan is no saint as you make him out to be The mistake my dear friend, Amitabh made is by listening to his friend Amar Singh.
Amar Singh is a politician who has vested interest in creating a vote-bank of Hindi-speaking migrants in Mumbai with the aim of gaining political power in Maharashtra.
Amitabh Bachan listened to his friend Amar Singh and became a "UP Brand Ambassador" and made ads like "UP mein jurm kum hain"
Any ordinary person, then is bound to think that Amitabh Bacchan is taking a political stand and that's where the problem lies.
Indulge in politics and expect politicans from the other end of the spectrum to counter you.
RE:Does this gesture does not come from heart?
by lavanya on Apr 08, 2008 10:04 AM Permalink
If next time any bachhan or amar singh or any lalu or mulayam will speak wrong things they will get bitten badly and will be kicked out of maharashtra. Sorry this really want to mean.
Rajani eats from the money earned through tamil films and tamil audiences (hence talks in favour of tamil nadu) big B however does not eat out of marathi films and his audience is not limited to marathi manoos only, hence he has no reasons to sit on a dharna for any marathi cause like Rajani saar did in chennai .... rajani saar still has to milk the tamils you see, he is not yet retired ...
RE:RE:difference between Rajani and Big B
by lavanya on Apr 08, 2008 10:06 AM Permalink
south indians and maharashtra are one and u up & bihari all illeterate should be send to pak and china
RE:difference between Rajani and Big B
by Amitesh Raghavan on Apr 08, 2008 10:37 AM Permalink
Maharastra is not in South India....these crap goons, North Dravidians i.e. Marathi's cannot be in south India and India
RE:RE:RE:difference between Rajani and Big B
by Tanmay on Apr 08, 2008 10:30 AM Permalink
then why Lungi uthao aur Pungi bajao campaing against south indians?
RE:difference between Rajani and Big B
by Sanjay Rawat on Apr 08, 2008 08:48 AM Permalink
This is a good point. Its true that amitabh is the star of the country, unlike rajni. In fact amitabh (others like him) has made maharastra prosperous. ONly tamil poeple (nad in general south indians) are crazy for Rajni, whereas Amitabh is the star of the country.
RE:difference between Rajani and Big B
by praveen kumar on Apr 08, 2008 09:32 AM Permalink
after all mumbai is also part of south india, and rajni is much better human than amitabh. first get ur facts right and then comment on other people
RE:difference between Rajani and Big B
by Nilesh Mahadik on Apr 08, 2008 09:32 AM Permalink
Please explain how Amitabh has made Maharashtra prosperous?
RE:difference between Rajani and Big B
by Tanmay on Apr 08, 2008 10:29 AM Permalink
that is reposnsibility of Govt of Maharashtra. Did u or Raj contributed to prosper Maharashtra
i think all marathis should live only in maharashtra, they shall be thron out from other states, then they shall know what is india and what is politically motivated maharashtra, fools this is only shiv sena making you fool , understand ,
RE:m arathi
by ALPHA International on Apr 08, 2008 07:48 AM Permalink
dear phatak, i am not behari or up ka bhaiya,when all marathis get out of other states then this biharis shall be equally thron out, that is clear, i am not staying in India for many years but i even never had racism in America for me, i feel the way politicians are motivating people for their own benefits, they always need some MUDHA to talk and attract crowd and media around them. they got nothing to do like what Shiva ji marathe did. gracias
RE:m arathi
by Rajeev on Apr 08, 2008 07:46 AM Permalink
kya baat kahi hai, main bhi thoda add karta hoon:
1. Marathi people are the cleanest people. go any part of maharastra you will see all marathi clean well educated and real manus. if you see any dirtiness anywhere (even in remote villege) it's just b'z of Biharis.
* One of the primary reason of mumbai flood was use of polythene. believe me none of the uses the polythene its only used by bihari.
* everyone know that Mumbai is ruled by underworld, but again who is underworld its bihari, marathi are good people.
.. why is there so much importance to these actors.. You give them money they will dress up like a (maharastrian)sexy lady and dance around you like your traffic light sixer..
RE:Actors are acting..?
by ALPHA International on Apr 08, 2008 07:15 AM Permalink
why dont you do it and make lot of money, have you seen your face in mirror any time , monkey
if a man has no ill will and all good will to the people of the state where he has migrated, it is OK. versatility with the local language,the contribution, the donation, philonthrophic act to that state depends upon several factors. he need not be condemed for not being liberal with his contribution or even lack knowledge of the local dialect.. his total contribution should only be assessed.
