What happens if the project Goes on. When the rule of the day deciphers the broken parts of the peoples delegated authoritatorial vivinity, then the actual method of implementing the characteristic persona in this situation becomes even more cryptic and partially this can be attributed to the moving and fast paced thongs.
Naturally MR SM Krishna and his TN counterpart understand this fact very well and would not entitle any one to have the luncheon at any desired provocation at the slightest.
Hi guys, From the past , we can say that karanataka is gud every neighbouring state, 1. Lets take AndhraPradesh, from recent past Karanataka had a fight with AP on Allmatti Dam .. 2. Tamilnadu.. This always on going process ..there are two to three times .. that KARNATAKA had a fight recently ... 3. Comming to Maharastra , Even with this state also they had a fight at the borders ... 4. The same with kerala also ... So , Karanataka say that they are GUD, .. when they are GUD atleast one of the state whould compromise .. but look at the situation .. they have a fight with each and every state surrounding them .. and they say that THEY ARE THE ONLY GUD ONES AMONG THE LOT, lets us start thinking .. what DO u say .. when u have a friend who has fights with all others .. is THE ONE GOOD or THE OTHERS ... pleaseeee every one start thinking ...
RE:its true .. karnataka is gud ...
by prashanth kumar on Apr 03, 2008 10:05 PM Permalink
India is fighting with Pak Bangla and china you mean to say it id good OR bad
RE:its true .. karnataka is gud ...
by Santhosh Kumar on Apr 04, 2008 12:07 AM Permalink
Fight with Maharashtra. Would you keep quiet if a Karnataka origin MLA in Krishnagiri stop hoisting a Tamil nadu flag?? Same is happening at Belgaum. Wat did Jayalalitha do when the cauvery committee was visiting the dam?? She released all the cauvery water into the ocean. The cleaning of ponds and lakes were not allowed in Cauvery basin, being a farmer you know the consequences faced if its not cleaned. U always think of your benefits. Since Ram Sethu benefits you guys, Karunanidhi said Ram does not exist, he's a drunkard. He's just an oppurtunist.
RE:its true .. karnataka is gud ...
by somesh n on Apr 03, 2008 09:11 PM Permalink
u wouldn't hav said this if u were GUD one!! yes really..... try to be gud to all ur people surrounding you, one or the other at one time or other they sit on ur head!! this is real and natural fact!! its the same happended here with karnataka state, where its been so goooooood such that neighbouring idiots are misusing that for political lobby, once u observe at borders how people are calm and understanding with each other.....?? irespective of issue raised by (beeeeeep | sensored!!) so its not the problem with in state its by thieves outside!! surounding!!
Hi guys, From the past , we can say that karanataka is gud every neighbouring state, 1. Lets take AndhraPradesh, from recent past Karanataka had a fight with AP on Allmatti Dam .. 2. Tamilnadu.. This always on going process ..there are two to three times .. that KARNATAKA had a fight recently ... 3. Comming to Maharastra , Even with this state also they had a fight at the borders ... 4. The same with kerala also ... So , Karanataka say that they are GUD, .. when they are GUD atleast one of the state whould compromise .. but look at the situation .. they have a fight with each and every state surrounding them .. and they say that THEY ARE THE ONLY GUD ONES AMONG THE LOT, lets us start thinking .. what DO u say .. when u have a friend who has fights with all others .. is THE ONE GOOD or THE OTHERS ... pleaseeee every one start thinking ...
RE:its true .. karnataka is gud ...
by prashanth kumar on Apr 03, 2008 10:06 PM Permalink
Dear veeru it was Karunanidhi who secretly planned the dam in disputed area of hogenakal so that they can swallow it fom Karnataka.They run and oppose each and every plan of karnataka in cavery basin and complain to cauvery authority.Such people why hided this dam issue from Cauvery authority.He thought there is no Governament in Karnataka so wanted to utilise the situation. Coming back to drinking water ,the same Tamil nadu stopped the cleaning of Ponds and lakes in three districts of Karnataka which were near to Cauvey(not belonged to River) fearing that Karnataka may store river water there and create shortage.you know each and every village has pond or Lake and if it is not cleaned what will happen to villagers. Finally it was Karunanidhi who called Kannada people as Lingustic in public meeting and te whole world knows who are linguistic people. if they people feel kannadigs are linguistic then why cant they accept hindi as National Language. I really dont think there is any flaws in the information given by me and I do not suppot the quarrel between TN and Karnataka
A spate of things are happening here. What heppens if the project goes on. The synduicate is making sure that whenn the imposible is to take place at a schedulesd place and the peak of the hour people are supposed to lead and delegate the authority, the task then decided must be subjugated to the senior entity, as in the case of this procedure that is being curretnly followed.
S.M Krishna and his TN counter part must uinderstand one thin here which is very important, that is that the rule of the day is to provide human faculty the foremost conceival on the long run.
Politicised linguistic, caste or ethnic groups frequently frustrate the ideologies of (corporate) beauty by expressing their 'desire for democracy', rather than modernity, thereby disrupting the rational visions of the town planners and citizens who cherish the image of a city that will take its proud place in a global capitalist order. At a time when the instrumentalities of the state (the judicial or the planning apparatuses) are skilfully deployed by those possessed of a vision of modernity, the untidy often violent spatial strategies of political society may well "reterritorialise" space that has been "deterritorialised" by the globalisation of capital so that "we may well be witnessing an emerging opposition between modernity and democracy" in the contests over city-space.
Mr Krishna talks about "procedures" which never followed in the cauvery issue when he was the CM..he refused to abide by the Cauvery River Authority order, the tribunal order and above all he refused to obey the Supreme Court's order. He went ahead with the Cauvery Neeravari Nigam's projects (major irrigation projects, not drinking water ones) in Karnataka much against TN's opposition and the tribunal's orders. Now this guy preaches others about procedures, protocols and what not ? and he is asking for TN's cooperation !! for what ? to stall the project? Did Karnataka ever cooperate with TN in the past ? Karnataka has always used the so called "talks" as an effective way to avoid a decision ..this is one more disgusting attempt.. Karunanidhi should not fall prey to this one and buckle. He should go all the way and complete the project.
RE:Look who is preaching..!!
by prashanth kumar on Apr 03, 2008 10:07 PM Permalink
Dear veeru it was Karunanidhi who secretly planned the dam in disputed area of hogenakal so that they can swallow it fom Karnataka.They run and oppose each and every plan of karnataka in cavery basin and complain to cauvery authority.Such people why hided this dam issue from Cauvery authority.He thought there is no Governament in Karnataka so wanted to utilise the situation. Coming back to drinking water ,the same Tamil nadu stopped the cleaning of Ponds and lakes in three districts of Karnataka which were near to Cauvey(not belonged to River) fearing that Karnataka may store river water there and create shortage.you know each and every village has pond or Lake and if it is not cleaned what will happen to villagers. Finally it was Karunanidhi who called Kannada people as Lingustic in public meeting and te whole world knows who are linguistic people. if they people feel kannadigs are linguistic then why cant they accept hindi as National Language. I really dont think there is any flaws in the information given by me and I do not suppot the quarrel between TN and Karnataka
RE:Look who is preaching..!!
by apocalypto on Apr 04, 2008 11:37 AM Permalink
Dear prashanth.. Read constitutional articles before referring National Language.. In India there is no national language. Hindi/English is a convenient language at the center and each state has their official language.Number of non hindi speakers are more than hindi speakers.
The invisibility of Kannada and Kannadigas within Karnataka (where only 65 per cent of the people claim Kannada as their mother tongue) is emphasised in language activists' analyses of demographic change in Bangalore city. Not only are Kannada speakers a minority in Bangalore (35%) but non-Kannadigas such as "north Indians" dominate the business world, while Tamils and Malayalis dominate the privileged enclaves of industrial work, and even trade union leadership.Statistics are used to prove that Tamils constitute the most numerous, though declining, body of migrants into the city after Kannadigas. In the view of groups such as the Shakthi Kendra, Tamils are the stubbornly unassimilable minority in the city, flaunting their language, cultural symbols and heroes unlike the Telugus or the Malayalis.
The longer history of Tamil residence in the erstwhile cantonment has certainly produced a well developed identity that newer Tamil migrants, particularly from non-upper castes, have found easy to identify with. The Bangalore Tamil Sangam has played an important role in enabling such assimilation, promoting Tamil literary and cultural programmes since 1950, as well as organising Kannada classes (since 1962) popular among Government employees seeking promotions. Despite this record, it was the Sangam's effort to instal a statue of its cultural hero, Thiruvalluvar, that led to a bitter and prolonged controversy that remains unresolved.
RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by Tamil natan on Apr 03, 2008 08:07 PM Permalink
These dissenting voices were overwhelmed by the strident tone of groups such as the Kannada Shakti Kendra and the Rajkumar Abhimanigala sangha against Tamil cultural assertion, a tone that became more menacing in the days leading up to the Cauvery agitation and anti-Tamil riots of December 1991 following a central directive regarding the sharing of the Cauvery river waters. Many Kannada leaders emphasised that the people of Karnataka were paying the price for their historic tolerance of other communities; violence was to be the new language of the Kannada movement. No wonder then that the Tamil groups in turn took to a defensive reinterpretation of Bangalore's history, suggesting through an analysis of place names and temples that the region had been a Tamil stronghold since the time of the Cholas. "In fact," said the Tamil Sangham pamphlet A Mute Genocide, "Tamils of Bangalore and Kolar are the original inhabitants and these areas were gradually colonised". The alleged arrogance of former Tamil Sangam President Maran in saying "I was born in Bangalore, not in Karnataka" echoed demands for Bangalore's "autonomy" from the region.
RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by hemanth ba on Apr 07, 2008 12:43 PM Permalink
Hey Natan, good analysis, effective use of words and tone i must say. You look like an extremist or should i draw parallels to Tamil Jihadism. Among all the facts that you have published, no where i have seen your commitment/belief to the democracy of the country/society. All i can see is tamil, tamil, tamil. This clearly shows the callous attitude of so called Tamil revolutionalists. Incidents in Malaysia, Sri Lanka are a just to name a few. Today Bangalore, tommorow Singapore. I mean instead of respecting the local traditions and promoting oneness among the society wherever they live, Tamilians only care about Self Domination of their Language, their people. It's high time you tamilians realise to associate yourself and feel as INDIAN more than a Tamilian
RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by venkata cha laiah on Apr 03, 2008 08:17 PM Permalink
You people Never integrate wherever go, That is why people from karnataka, narth indians, Srilankans, Malaysians hates Tamils.
Try to integrate wherever you go, you will propser quicky, otherwise what happened to LTTE prabhakar and prbhakaran son in Srilanka, same thing is going to happen in Bangalore and Malaysia.
RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by vishal on Apr 03, 2008 08:21 PM Permalink
Our talents arre used everywhere around the world and hatredness arises because of jealousy.. its ok.. rather than shouting like a dog and not useful lazy,arrogant and fit for nothing ppl who knows only to fight with selfishness like u
RE:RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by venkata cha laiah on Apr 03, 2008 08:32 PM Permalink
Your talent is used only for to become slaves of malaysians and srilankans
RE:RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by Umakanth Reddy on Apr 03, 2008 08:40 PM Permalink
Vankata Cha first get out of our telengana. Then talk about regional integrity. You people have totally utilised our natural resources. And brought us to roads. Go back to Andhra and leave our Telengana alone.
RE:RE:RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by venkata laiah on Apr 03, 2008 08:51 PM Permalink
Fool i am not Telugu fellow.
RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by Tamil natan on Apr 03, 2008 08:18 PM Permalink
Read the article - carefully. Then comment. If you don't undertsand then keep quiet.
RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by venkata cha laiah on Apr 03, 2008 08:20 PM Permalink
Shall honour with a Phd for your cooked up theish
RE:RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by Umakanth Reddy on Apr 03, 2008 08:41 PM Permalink
Vankata Cha first get out of our telengana. Then talk about regional integrity. You people have totally utilised our natural resources. And brought us to roads. Go back to Andhra and leave our Telengana alone.
RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by tamil on Apr 03, 2008 08:25 PM Permalink
u know many kannadi settled some 500 yrs ppl r in TN , particularly in Cbe, Erode, Palani, Cumbum belt ...
u know one thing still they speak kannadam... which no Tamils ever opposed...
its mainly the ppl who hate Tamils growth r hating us.. check the history...
RE:RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by Tamil natan on Apr 03, 2008 08:08 PM Permalink
By no means did the Kannada organisations that raised virulent opposition to the Thiruvalluvar statue speak for all Kannada intellectuals and social groups. A large group of Kannada intellectuals publicly condemned this stand as trivialising the cause of Kannada, and undoing a unique heritage that has been enriched by several languages.81 Many of them had consistently opposed the more belligerent, and anti-minority, turn that the Kannada movement had taken in Bangalore since the Gokak agitation. Another critic of Kannada chauvinism, KRRS chief Nanjundaswamy said both Tamils and Kannadigas should make common cause as Dravidians. Opposition to the Kannada protagonists was framed quite differently by the Karnataka Samata Sainik Dal which laid claim to Thiruvalluvar as a Dalit poet, and read the opposition of upper caste Kannadigas as another move to deny Dalits any visibility.
RE:RE:RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by venkata cha laiah on Apr 03, 2008 08:17 PM Permalink
You people Never integrate wherever go, That is why people from karnataka, narth indians, Srilankans, Malaysians hates Tamils.
Try to integrate wherever you go, you will propser quicky, otherwise what happened to LTTE prabhakar and prbhakaran son in Srilanka, same thing is going to happen in Bangalore and Malaysia.
RE:RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by venkata cha laiah on Apr 03, 2008 08:28 PM Permalink
Nice barkly in TN not Karnataka, Srilanka, Malaysia
RE:RE:RE:RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by Umakanth Reddy on Apr 03, 2008 08:40 PM Permalink
Vankata Cha first get out of our telengana. Then talk about regional integrity. You people have totally utilised our natural resources. And brought us to roads. Go back to Andhra and leave our Telengana alone.
RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by venkata laiah on Apr 03, 2008 08:58 PM Permalink
Fool i am not a telugu guy
RE:RE:RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by Tamil natan on Apr 03, 2008 08:26 PM Permalink
Politicised linguistic, caste or ethnic groups frequently frustrate the ideologies of (corporate) beauty by expressing their 'desire for democracy', rather than modernity, thereby disrupting the rational visions of the town planners and citizens who cherish the image of a city that will take its proud place in a global capitalist order. At a time when the instrumentalities of the state (the judicial or the planning apparatuses) are skilfully deployed by those possessed of a vision of modernity, the untidy often violent spatial strategies of political society may well "reterritorialise" space that has been "deterritorialised" by the globalisation of capital so that "we may well be witnessing an emerging opposition between modernity and democracy" in the contests over city-space.
RE:The battle for Bangalore - an article I have just read - there is more to this
by prashanth kumar on Apr 03, 2008 10:08 PM Permalink
Dear veeru it was Karunanidhi who secretly planned the dam in disputed area of hogenakal so that they can swallow it fom Karnataka.They run and oppose each and every plan of karnataka in cavery basin and complain to cauvery authority.Such people why hided this dam issue from Cauvery authority.He thought there is no Governament in Karnataka so wanted to utilise the situation. Coming back to drinking water ,the same Tamil nadu stopped the cleaning of Ponds and lakes in three districts of Karnataka which were near to Cauvey(not belonged to River) fearing that Karnataka may store river water there and create shortage.you know each and every village has pond or Lake and if it is not cleaned what will happen to villagers. Finally it was Karunanidhi who called Kannada people as Lingustic in public meeting and te whole world knows who are linguistic people. if they people feel kannadigs are linguistic then why cant they accept hindi as National Language. I really dont think there is any flaws in the information given by me and I do not suppot the quarrel between TN and Karnataka
When your dam gets full after rain, u open and flooded TN and destroyed the farms.. When u decide not to share please follow that everytime.. If u standby ur side u should not leave water even when the dam is full..
