partial removal going to affect the ecology that drastically now. In case the supposed bridge is a submerged mountain ridge, can its partial escavation make the ecology topsy turvy?
In the name of Ram, there should not be any impediment in the proposed canal, because he built it in the humility of man. In the name of ecology, there should not be any impediment in the proposed canal, because neither its construction by Ram nor its formation due to some natural cause, have not seem to have resulted in destruction !!
Now, like good baniyas, let us come to the point. In case the returns from the canal is not worth the investments (it is said that the new canal after completion would be suitable for the safe passage of a certain capacity ships, which are being phased out !!), then the canal project should not be undertaken.
Thank Ram that at last Marwaris have taken over the responsibility to practice and promote Hinduism, when the other `superior castes' have gone to become ...... well I need not have to say. Otherwise, how the VHP would have ever hoped to get enough supply of free Ramayans for their proposed morcha ? :)
None of the responses pasted above this one are perfect. One of the above by name Munna bhai dated Sept 25 has abused the Hindus. It is like the cat drinking milk closing its eyes and thinking that the world is not seeing. Munna bhai, first read Indian History carefully and then respond yaar. You will know that Hinduism is the only religion in the World history that has not invaded any other country or Religion and its people. The religions other than hinduism prompt violence and destructions in their Religious Laws itself. Study them also and you will know who prompted violence. All the remaining religions, in one time or other, have invaded one part of the world or other and they all tried to destroy the very basis of religious culture present at that place, not talk of India & Hinduism. Even today, there are are many living examples on the effects of these invasions, by these cruel invaders who are none other than Demons or the incarnations of Rakshasas in the Hindu Puranas. First of all know the Indian History, written by Nationalists ( Patriots ) other than Communist Writers for these Communist Writers always try to abuse hindus in each and every possible way. Finally, I declare that keeping in view the eco-biological factors, RAM SETHU Project should be taken up leaving the RAM SETHU intact and opting for another alternative without disturbing the actual RAM SETHU.
RE:Responses of various viewers on the above issue.
by Ramanath Babu on Sep 25, 2007 04:30 PM Permalink
The problem with Hindus is that they are a tolerent lot. In the name of secularism they allow others to heap on insult to their religion. If it was some other relgion, christians or muslims would not have allowed here to stay.
See the number of HIndus who questions the existence of God. But in other relgion, say in Christianity or Islam, they do not question the existence of their God. Here we Hindus allows to question the existence of God by their own people. No wonder, the other relions have the guts to critice us. They know Hindus are a spine-less lot.
RE:IF we force people to say RAM is GOD
by Priyank Thakur on Sep 25, 2007 04:21 PM Permalink
Mr. Jackson.. F O we also dont believe that ur father is ur father..
RE:IF we force people to say RAM is GOD
by barun pratiher on Sep 25, 2007 04:29 PM Permalink
tx priyank..he has to prove that he is son of his father..it may be son of..think what am i telling?
RE:IF we force people to say RAM is GOD
by on Sep 25, 2007 04:31 PM Permalink
Believe is inside. Karunanidhi is a foolish who is challenging the existance of Lord Ram. Jesus was crusified outside the town not inside the town because socalled Christans on that time thought that he was a mad man. But whether he is a mad man? If any body believes Ram is there and he is God what is the harm. Nobody should play with sentiments of common man. Swapan Roy Choudhuri
RE:IF we force people to say RAM is GOD
by Vijay urf Teesmar Khan on Sep 25, 2007 04:27 PM Permalink
question is not of Ram being God or not. Question is of his existance and a Sethu made by him with his fellows. Whether you think Ram as God or not, does not have any effect. But you can not deny Ram Sethu. Even if it was not made by Ram and his army, it hardly makes any difference, because a belief is a belief. Can any one prove that the hair kept at Hzrat Bal belongs to the beard of muhammad?
visit this site http://www.ramsethu.org/indexmore.html
Hindus it's the time to wake up ... We mild hindus worship peace but we are capable to face any aggression ...we have to proove it .. Plz be a part of ram sethu movement of VHP and other hindu organizations ..After ayodhya movement once again we hindus will proove our strength in the RAM RAJYA. Hindu jage Desh jage!!!!!!!!
RE:Jai Sri Ram
by Sahadevan KK on Sep 25, 2007 04:31 PM Permalink
Left is the truth. US started to frighten Manmohan Singh that India should clarify the Iran-India relation. This world notorious criminal can ask these things only to Congress and BJP.
RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by Jackson on Sep 25, 2007 04:21 PM Permalink
If we start telling these stories in Public, people will laugh at us only and ask for proof.
Whichever GOD, if you talk about supernatural in public, get ready to be introspected.
RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by suresh on Sep 25, 2007 04:21 PM Permalink
rasheed u know whts there in ur kaba its shiva linga if u have doubt u go excavate and see it to believe it
RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by vipul on Sep 25, 2007 04:23 PM Permalink
THERE ARE MANY TECHNOLOGIES BY WHICH LIFE CAN BE BROUGHT INTO.
SCIENTISTS ARE NOW DISCOVERING THE CLONING.
EARLIER ALSO THERE WERE MANY SUCH METHODS, WHICH ARE NOT AVAILABLE TODAY. EARLIER HINDUS WERE MUCH MORE ADVANCED THAN TODAY'S SCIENCE. THEY WERE NOT BARBARIANS LIKE OTHER RELIGIONS.
MATA PARVATI PRODUCED A BODY IN A MOMENT, WITH HER TECNOLOGY, AND LORD SHIVA FIXED A HEAD ON IT WITH HIS TECHNOLOGY.
RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by Sahadevan KK on Sep 25, 2007 04:24 PM Permalink
Every religion has been made to believe God and follow a disciplinary path. Every believers who believe in one must respect all. This is the fundamentalism of religion. Some people for gaining money to redraw religion and mislead others.
RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by secret secret on Sep 25, 2007 04:25 PM Permalink
any religion's mythology will be full of logical errors. (some will even say there are no logical errors either, and it was pre-meditated for a greater cause.)
you should not look at mythology as something lacking in logic. you should look at religion and associated mythology as the self-respect of people believing in it. when you attack it, you are attacking something they consider as their identity, and therefore, them.
RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by veera on Sep 25, 2007 04:26 PM Permalink
it is not a person with elephant head. ganesh is person with the elephant brain. elephant has more memory power
RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by shanmuga subramanian on Sep 25, 2007 04:43 PM Permalink
though Ganesha was Shiva's son ,Shiva was in deep penance for many years so that he did n't know when he was born!that's the reason
RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by Mohan Kumar on Sep 25, 2007 04:45 PM Permalink
Let me ask you this question...if God is all powerful...the one who created the world..everyone..you..me...
Why does he need a prophet to spread is message.
He needs a human's help? Isn't he supposed to be all powerful?
Why doesnt he just make everyone perfect that the world is all peaceful and perfect?
Why does evil ever have to be there at all?
One possible explanation is the events in history of how god conveys his message to men are lessons to humans. If you appreciate this..then you would appreciate the shiva, parvati, ganesh's story. ofcourse..you only have heard a bit of the entire story so it is better you dont comment about it.
RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by Mickey Joshi on Sep 25, 2007 05:06 PM Permalink
If you don't know the complete story you don't the right to comment.
Please read the entire story and then comment
More over you idiots will believe that GOD gave mohammed the quran. But will not believe in the other religions.
RE:RE:Shiva not able recognise Ganesha !!!! is he a god?
by Rasheed on Sep 25, 2007 06:00 PM Permalink
To All hindu brothers. all your questions answered by Dr.Zakir Naik on www.irf.net he gave live shows in nearly 160 countries and has sound knowledge in all religions.
http://www.irf.net/irf/faqonislam/index.htm
All doubts related to ISLAM.All all requested to first know about ISLAM and it is teachings.
the answer is rather simple......how many years will tamil people remember him after his death?....probably a 100 years or who knows only 10 years.....after karunanidhi's death a popular road in chennai will named MK road or sethusamdram project will be named as MK bridge and many ststues......all will forget him in an 100 years even though DMK will do every year try to remember him......but lord rama was being remembered across lenght and breadth of vast india from thousands of years.....his divine story is also a part of cultures of east asian nations such as thailand, indonesia, malysia and combodia.....how long mr. karunanidhis popularity will remain in tamil nadu after his death?......
RE:About Existence
by Priyank Thakur on Sep 25, 2007 04:24 PM Permalink
agar tu sahi main pankaj sharma hai.. to apni maataji se re-confirm kar Hindu ke naaam pe Kalank
RE:About Existence
by Priyank Thakur on Sep 25, 2007 04:24 PM Permalink
agar tu sahi main pankaj sharma hai.. to apni maataji se re-confirm kar Hindu ke naaam pe Kalank
Ram exists in all our hearts. Just count the number of times we use the term, "RAM" be it in salutations (Ram-Ram), be it in somebody's name (Raman, Ramkumar, Ramakrshnan), in prayers (hey Ram), in fun (Hai Ram).
The History saw only one person who refused to accept that Ram was a god and in RAMAYANA we know what happened to him. This modern day Ravan will also meet the same fate.
