Prejudiced and fanatic people cannot change their mind.Left is anti US, as such this was expected.In our system, there is no way out, only voters can teach them a lesson in next elections.
RE:Left
by mohd khan on Sep 19, 2007 04:43 PM Permalink
when they will get three times the seats they are having now...in the poorest country of the world that is India now...with 770 million poors..including you...left is the only option...
RE:Left
by Sachin on Sep 19, 2007 04:44 PM Permalink
Which voters will teach them a lesson? Only with votes from two states (WB and Kerala) they are holding entire contry for ransom. Kerala voters always shuffle between left and right, but WB voters are steadfastly with the Commies. Till the time WB voters boot out the commies, I see no end to this from the red brigade - power without accountability.
RE:Left
by arungopal agarwal on Sep 19, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
To Mr. Khan and Sachin, We are to bear them in our democratic system.No way out.I do not have any appreciation for them, but they are keeping WB with them from the last 20 years. Certainly appreciateable.
.The LEFT in India is a leftover party after the Collapse of the USSR.It bats for China,Pakistan and Iran AGAINST the Indian people. See their track records for the last 60 Years. It has a big 80 plus Club of Garrullous Oldies from kolkatta and Young looking Oldies at heart and Moronic Heads like Karat,Yechury and others. People should ignore these Idiots.
RE:LEFT in India
by Sachin on Sep 19, 2007 04:47 PM Permalink
Sadly the people you want them to forget are voting them, thats why they are having so many seats in LS. WB and Kerala voters should do away with commies, its high time now.
RE:left's objection
by raj on Sep 19, 2007 06:57 PM Permalink
joseph varghese , I agree with you point .But Mrs. Gandhi was very pro-Soviet. I know what you mean. Leadership and guts that point you are right.
The commies are upto their tricks again. They are the foot soldiers of the Chinese.. and their loyalty lies in Beijing and not in Delhi.
Their objection to the Indo-US deal only goes on to show that they are the biggest hurdle to our progress. The people who elected them (Kerala and Bengal) should see to it that they are punished in the next elections. If they are really so fond of the left, elect them to the asemblies by all means.. but keep them out of the Lok Sabha. Why should the whole of India suffer because of the folly of two states ???
RE:Throw the commies out !!!
by Sumit Dutta on Sep 19, 2007 04:33 PM Permalink
I am from Bengal and I vote for the left.But please understand that left leaders from bengal like Buddhadeb,Biman Bose are against this stupidity of prakash karat
RE:Throw the commies out !!!
by Rajesh Vyas on Sep 19, 2007 04:56 PM Permalink
Sir:
They are all the same. These CHINA lovers specialize in Double talk and change their colours very often to suit their needs. They have ruined West Bengal and now they want to ruin the rest of India
RE:Throw the commies out !!!
by raj on Sep 19, 2007 07:00 PM Permalink
Sumit Dutta , In that case why cant they come out in open and say it. Your communist ideology is dead. GONE . It is not meant for poor.It is meant to exploit the poor and get vote and power.Soviet Union was a fine example.
RE:Throw the commies out !!!
by lion king on Sep 19, 2007 04:51 PM Permalink
What you say is probably correct Sumit. The fact that Bauddhadeb is forward looking and progressive is obvious to everybody. But that feact remains that he seems to have very little say in what the Left does in Delhi. That is precisely my point. Keep the left out of Delhi !!!
RE:Throw the commies out !!!
by joseph varghese on Sep 19, 2007 04:31 PM Permalink
agree with you, what ever edjucated they are, Keralites and Bengalies are still behave like idiots
Just thinking if Indira Gandhi was there, she will definitely ban communists for ever at this point of time... She had guts and made such things...This Sonia madam do not have that...
RE:If Indira GANDHI was there....
by narayan halder on Sep 19, 2007 04:22 PM Permalink
You are correct but she could never go for the agreement and obviously ban thouse people who are pro-american...
RE:If Indira GANDHI was there....
by George Fernandes on Sep 19, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
Do you know that Indira Gandhi banned the RSS during the emergency?
RE:RE:If Indira GANDHI was there....
by Vijay alias Teesmar Khan on Sep 19, 2007 06:02 PM Permalink
But RSS became more powerful. Let not commies become more powerful by banning. Let them die their own death in polls.
LEFT HAS NO UNDERSTANDING OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS. THEY ARE FISHES IN A POND, NOT IN THE SEA. INDIA HAS TO SEE IT'S OWN INTEREST AND ALLY WITH THE WINNERS. I AM SURE THAT MANMOHAN SINGH UNDERSTANDS THE ERCONOMICS MORE THAN THE LEFT. WE SHOULD TRUST HIM. WE HOPE TO ELIMINATE THE NUSANCE VALUE OF LEFT IN THE NEXT ELECTION.
RE:LEFT REJECTING 123 NUCLEAR DEAL WITH USA
by ItsMe on Sep 19, 2007 04:05 PM Permalink
but we are not signing the hyde, we are signing the 123. nothing is irreversible. india can walk out anytime it wants and there are other suppliers.... this is a hump that needs to be crossed, that's it.
RE:RE:LEFT REJECTING 123 NUCLEAR DEAL WITH USA
by narayan halder on Sep 19, 2007 04:36 PM Permalink
But the short title of Hye Act is SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE. This title may be cited as the %u2018%u2018Henry J. Hyde United States-India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act of 2006%u2019%u2019. A description of the steps that India is taking to work with the United States for the conclusion of a multilateral treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons, including a description of the steps that the United States has taken and will take to encourage India to identify and declare a date by which India would be willing to stop production of fissile material for nuclear weapons unilaterally or pursuant to a multilateral moratorium or treaty.
RE:LEFT REJECTING 123 NUCLEAR DEAL WITH USA
by Janam on Sep 19, 2007 04:36 PM Permalink
Iran is a country that signed an agreement (NOT) and now going against it, If we look at that perspective our vote goes down well against Iran. Compare this with our agreements , even after so many wars and loss of life we still continue to honor Indus water sharing treaty with Pakistan.
Even if US walks out we would still have strategic reserves that would help running the reactors, as a worst possible case we may have to return the reactors at current market prices. Which is fair.
Even after Testing a nuke, US is not going to terminate the agreement right away, it is still going to examine under what circumstances it has done so (The tests), and then only any action would be taken.
Well I think it is in our interest to go ahead with the agreement rather than get sidelined. This may also act as a precursor for us getting sensitive space and military technology.
With sensitive space, military and nuclear technology only Pakistan and China should be worried, Communists have joined these two to destroy India from within.
RE:LEFT REJECTING 123 NUCLEAR DEAL WITH USA
by Harsha K on Sep 19, 2007 04:38 PM Permalink
You mean to say India had to vote for Iran, and support _another_ islamic country, that never supported us in any of our troubles in international fora, to become a nuclear weapon state?
If only guys remove their heads from sand they'll see that India and US are on the same side of the table, at this point in time.
RE:RE:LEFT REJECTING 123 NUCLEAR DEAL WITH USA
by raj on Sep 19, 2007 07:11 PM Permalink
very simple. Iran threatened Isreal saying they want to wipe that country from the face of the earth. When its leader talk like that what US is suppose to do. They are NATO allies. When did India threatended any country in this fashion? Iran(good old Perscia) want to dominate that region. And intimidate Gulf nations. We all know Percian history.
RE:LEFT REJECTING 123 NUCLEAR DEAL WITH USA
by lion king on Sep 19, 2007 04:32 PM Permalink
The contention that we are selling our sovereignity to the US is a load of crap !!!
Let the US walk out whenever they want to...! Remember, that the US is not the main supplier of Uranium.. and there is nothing in the agreement to say that we should not stock some Uranium for use. Atleast till that time we can have the right to import Uranium and generate some power. In any event, our need for Uranium is till the time our reactors using Thorium are not ready. After that we are free to use th fuel of our choice.. and would certainly go in for locally available Thorium. The intervening period .. say the next 10-15 years... is crucial for our development. The left obviously recognises this, and wants to see that we fail in comparison with their gods.. the Chinese.
RE:LEFT REJECTING 123 NUCLEAR DEAL WITH USA
by raj on Sep 19, 2007 07:05 PM Permalink
What a lousy idea you are preaching. In that case all countries who are close to the US are stupid? You are a Commie. It is very clear from your article.
RE:LEFT REJECTING 123 NUCLEAR DEAL WITH USA
by MOHAN PYARE on Sep 19, 2007 04:54 PM Permalink
What is wrong in the three clauses b,c & d listed above? Do you want to support proliferation like Mr.Abdul Quadir Khan did?
RE:RE:LEFT REJECTING 123 NUCLEAR DEAL WITH USA
by raj on Sep 19, 2007 07:15 PM Permalink
by , You must be the smartest man. If you know the detail why dont you mediate and slove the problem. GO FLY A KITE. YOU ARE A DAMN COMMIE and ANTI-INDIAN .
