Most of the SICKularist are racist analysts following their colonial masters. They have forgotten to condemn thugs like Karnunanidhi.
Any articles describing why Karunanidhi is a bigot ? Are you there Sai Suresh ? Or Mr Sai Suresh, Sheela Bhat etc trying to plot a save Kangress campaign ?
People have stooped low. They will do anything for promotion and a piece of chicken.
Problems is that the canal still won't be deep enough for really huge tankers and vessels which form a majority of the vessels [60,000 dead weight and up sizes] while the current plan only allows ships of size 30,000 to pass through. Besides the waters after digging will be unetsted waters and no vessel might want to test them at their own expense or risk. The canal will not be wide enough for free navigation and so ships will sail through slowly and burn up more fuel. So some hours saved will not be worth their while to spend on more fule and pay taxes for going through. Ships that don't use Indian ports at Kanyakumari will not need that route at all. The cost of dregging sand over and over to maintain the canal will be a whopping 100 crores a year.
Apart from this loss of ecology, coral reefs, the impact on marine life and fishing and consequent natural repurcussions if the interference with the sea creates natural disturbances or imbalances is not taken into account. the enxt Tsunami or earthquake in the sea may prove more fatal with it's natural barriers tampered with. Forget Ram, nature will never forgive us for this folly and we will reap the destruction of the sea's natural flow at leisure in a big way. Kerala and Tamil nadu coasts will be highly vulnerable to the next great sea disaster.
This project has been initiated purely to mint money out Rs 2,500 crores is all and that is what all this fuss is about.
RE:Forget Ram. Even science and economics don't support this stupid Sethusamudram project.
by on Sep 18, 2007 07:04 PM Permalink
A wise message instead of so called emotional Rama's bridge
secularism by Deepak MK on Sep 18, 2007 06:41 PM | Hide replies | Hide message
RAM, JESUS & MOHAMMED ALL ATE THROUGH THE MOUTH AND EXCRETED THROUGH THE ANUS. ALL OF THEIR FAECES WUD HAVE SMELLED THE SAME...........THEN Y THIS HUNGAMA.........WAKE UP GUYS..........HELP AND LOVE EACH OTHER
RE:secularism by ashok pai on Sep 18, 2007 06:43 PM good point, put very bluntly.
Forward | Report abuse
RE:secularism by Rajib Batabyal on Sep 18, 2007 06:45 PM you are so smart
RE:What happened in Muzaffarnagar
by ahmed shaikh on Sep 18, 2007 07:06 PM Permalink
Zaynab bint Jahsh (Arabic: %u0632%u064A%u0646%u0628 %u0628%u0646%u062A %u062C%u062D%u0634 born c. 593) was a wife of Muhammad and therefore a Mother of the Believers.[1]
Her brother, Ubayd-Allah ibn Jahsh, went to the Migration to Abyssinia and there left Islam for Christianity. His wife, Ramlah bint Abu Sufyan, then remarried Muhammad.
She had a sister named Hammanah bint Jahsh.
Muslims f**k their own asses...and pray with their asses up, so that htey can aim at allah to have f**ked their wives!
how can you get historical evidence for some millions years ago events ..dwarka was found , we still have places named kurushetra,ayodhya,dwaraka,mathura etc ..how these surveys are not whole hearted attempts .with natural calamities etc.. some evidences are lost.same will happen tomorrow to some existing ones then what?
RE:Ram existed and he requires no certificate from the anti hindu pseudo secular govt
by Senso Johnson on Sep 18, 2007 06:59 PM Permalink
Please get out of India. The govt don't recognize your religion
RE:Ram existed and he requires no certificate from the anti hindu pseudo secular govt
by Ramkumar Krishnamurthy on Sep 18, 2007 07:12 PM Permalink
dei, vaaya moodura thevidiya payya
RE:Govt should declare prophet mohammed as a child *rapist.......and an incestous person.....
by ahmed shaikh on Sep 18, 2007 07:08 PM Permalink
Zaynab bint Jahsh (Arabic: %u0632%u064A%u0646%u0628 %u0628%u0646%u062A %u062C%u062D%u0634 born c. 593) was a wife of Muhammad and therefore a Mother of the Believers.[1]
Her brother, Ubayd-Allah ibn Jahsh, went to the Migration to Abyssinia and there left Islam for Christianity. His wife, Ramlah bint Abu Sufyan, then remarried Muhammad.
Muslims f**k their own asses...and pray with their asses up!
RE:Muhammed Nabi is terrorit
by ahmed shaikh on Sep 18, 2007 07:10 PM Permalink
Abdulla Shaikh is Mawali, by the way non arab muslims are known as Mawalis and are treated as third grade muslims because they are converted!
RE:RE:Muhammed Nabi is terrorit
by ahmed shaikh on Sep 18, 2007 07:13 PM Permalink
ek kaam kar, teri wife ko tere baap ke pass bhej de! Aur jab woh wapas aayegi teri maa ho jayegi..phir tu usko le!! How does it sound you pig?
RE:Great Rama
by simple on Sep 18, 2007 07:06 PM Permalink
at least they did not marry their own daughter as ur prophet did. they dont offer 72 virgins if somebody kills innocent people.
RE:Great Rama
by Thisnameistaken on Sep 18, 2007 06:55 PM Permalink
How many Jews did Mohammed murder ? Why was he ever arrested? Stealing ?? I do not agree, but I read such statements. And I am sure a fanatic like you will get offended by this.
RE:Great Rama
by Topno on Sep 18, 2007 06:57 PM Permalink
why muslims find it difficult to live with other religions (in Kashmir, Chechnia, Palestine, South East Asian countries) and harash the minorities (in Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, Bangladesh). Definitely they feel insecure with other religion and know that their own muslims will convert to other religion.
If Islam is so good, why muslims kill each other in Iraq, Afghanistan and kill other people in Kashmir, Israel, US through terrorism.
These incidents clearly speak that Islam has created a fear among muslims against other religions and multi-culture.
RE:Great Rama
by viswanadh rao on Sep 18, 2007 06:58 PM Permalink
you stupid khan, sita is not carrying when she returnd ayodhya from lanka.read ramayan properly.
