Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 6129 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85   Older >   >>
From He Ram to No Ram: Who benefits?
by KKA on Sep 15, 2007 09:15 PM  Permalink 

http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/sep/14sai.htm



Summary :

So was the affidavit the product of a pliant bureaucracy which, it is being said openly, saw the ascendancy of Christians in the power structure post-Sonia Gandhi and which felt driving a nail into Hinduism's icon would show itself in a positive light with the political masters? ...........



So 24 hours after the UPA government disses Ram in the Supreme Court, the government rediscovers his greatness and reinstates him in the Indian pantheon.



This, we are told, was done at the instance of Sonia Gandhi who has been reviled by Hindutva forces for her Christian origin and which shrill campaign nixed her chance of becoming prime minister in 2004.



Sonia Gandhi herself does not directly take credit for this act of grace; all those around her attribute the decision to her, taken out of respect for Hindu sentiment.



Heck, the person the Sangh Parivar painted as anti-Hindu is the one who has come to the Hindu's rescue, establishing her faith in one of the most revered gods of the land. Who benefits, you ask? Sonia Gandhi, obviously!





    Forward  |  Report abuse
Info on Ram Sethu
by Mahesh on Sep 15, 2007 09:15 PM  Permalink 

Take a look at the pictures and news in this site http://www.ramsethu.org/ and support the same.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Imran Patel
by Save Hinduism on Sep 15, 2007 09:12 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

So this bloke makes the remark that some one is a paid blogger..Now lets see the long bearded guys are the madrasas whose beard looks like hair borrowed from some other part of human anatomy are paid buffoons...Lets see the xian missionary next door owns 3 cars. That was just the money tha the holy ghost dropped off in his toilet....now lets see imran patel...the name itself is such a confusion...gujrati hindu and now a neo convert trying soo hard to prve his allegiance to his new bushy contemporaries...Now imran why did you convert ? what did you see in the dungeon faith of islam which believes in iron casting every thing even the freedom to think openly as is atleast in your case..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:Imran Patel
by imran patel on Sep 15, 2007 09:17 PM  Permalink
And what is "SAVE HINDUISM"...Leave that to your GODS...Are u so afraid that Hinduism will cease to exist ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:Imran Patel
by Save Hinduism on Sep 15, 2007 09:21 PM  Permalink
So you are asking why save hinduism?Lets see i am HHH but the fuc&ing moderator blocked my id so i created one right now and started coming after your a$$. Hinduism can cease to exist as a practice if awareness is not created in hindus to ward off morons like you...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:Imran Patel
by iluvtaj on Sep 15, 2007 09:30 PM  Permalink
IMRAN PATEL SAY "JAI HIND" first if u r INDIAN

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Imran Patel
by Save Hinduism on Sep 15, 2007 09:19 PM  Permalink
Hmmm.so mr wise guy tell me this circling concrete is fun and sprititual but hey worshipping deities is idolatory..hmmm uplifting indeed and certain sign of higher intellectual plateau..Moron convert you just proved my point that your thinking is iron cast....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Imran Patel
by Milind on Sep 15, 2007 09:25 PM  Permalink
Imran,



So Hindus are driven by Hate ? I wish we were. Then your grandfather would not have been beaten to death and forcefully converted by Auranzeb.



What are your brothers driven by when they blow up along with 10 innocent people ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Imran Patel
by iluvtaj on Sep 15, 2007 09:29 PM  Permalink
OK BUT SAY "JAI HIND" first if u r INDIAN

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Imran Patel
by amit jain on Sep 15, 2007 11:25 PM  Permalink
ram is mythological but 55 year old prophet mo's screw.. of 6 year old aisha is historically proven.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by imran patel on Sep 15, 2007 09:12 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

People who doubt that Jesus (PBUH) was born to a virgin mother, are just blind. Look around you, and you will find signs of the creator of the heavens and the earth. Think how a child is fed in his/her mothers womb. How creatures at the bottom of the ocean survive. How creatures survice at near boiling temperatures. See the changing seasons. See the balance that Allah has created. So why is it impossible for him to give a son to a virgin woman ?

Jesus (PBUH) was a great messenger of ALLAH/God. Muslims will never dis-respect his teachings and him.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by Vikas D on Sep 15, 2007 09:20 PM  Permalink
Imran, I have a suggestion for you. There is a very good place called 'school'. Go there and ask them that you want to 'enroll'. Sure they must have taught you how to fill an application form in your madrassa, if not, get help. You can start at Lower Kindergarten and from there on, at least till matriculation/10th Std, it will be 12 years. After those 12 years, come back to rediff and read what you've written.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by imran patel on Sep 15, 2007 09:25 PM  Permalink
Look at the arrogance in ur language...What makes you feel that you have more education than me ?

So judgemental...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by Save Hinduism on Sep 15, 2007 09:27 PM  Permalink
Inmran whats makes you think he is not?He just proved it..and you are just questioning his statement just for want of anything to say....you are just a blind bat..keep flapping away and keep hearring things at the subsonic level...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by amit jain on Sep 15, 2007 11:26 PM  Permalink
ram is mythological but 55 year old prophet mo's screw.. of 6 year old aisha is historically proven.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by Vikas D on Sep 15, 2007 09:30 PM  Permalink
Did you look at the arrogance in your language?? You were calling anyone who does not believe that Jesus was born of a virgin, blind. I just gave you a taste of your own medicine. Didn't like it, eh?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by excelwin on Sep 15, 2007 09:31 PM  Permalink
what do you expect from a madrasa educated gentleman? Strange he is in India and not flying planes into skyscrapers?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by Save Hinduism on Sep 15, 2007 09:38 PM  Permalink
No remember he is educated in indian madrasas so he can only fly kites into it

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by CG NAIR on Sep 15, 2007 09:15 PM  Permalink
Mr.Imran patel, these are all superstitions which the followers of semitic religions find possible!!!!!!!!!!!! The why redicule the beliefs of hindus just because they are not as agressive as the followers of semitic religions?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by imran patel on Sep 15, 2007 09:24 PM  Permalink
I do not ridicule the Hindu Religion. The vedas are very clear about ONE god. I will never ridicule the vedas. They may be the word of ALLAH. ALLAh says that he sent over one lakh messengers since Adam. Vedas may be the word of ALLAH and there may be prophets sent to India as well. What I do NOT believe in is MULTIPLE gods...Hindus have given an image to GOD, typical human behavior. We find it easy to believe something that is tangible. Same with the christians. How do they know Christ blue eyed blond man ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Jesus (PBUH) born to Virgin Mary (PBUH)
by amit jain on Sep 15, 2007 11:26 PM  Permalink
ram is mythological but 55 year old prophet mo's screw.. of 6 year old aisha is historically proven.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
BJP/VHP/Hindutva Movement Driven by Hatered...
by imran patel on Sep 15, 2007 09:05 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

BJP/VHP/Hindutva Movement Driven by Hatered. What positive do they have to offer to the people of India. Key Drivers for their activist are,

- Hatered for Pakistan

- Hatered for Congress/Sonia Gandhi

- Hatered for Muslims

- Hatered for "Secularist" beacuse they do NOT follow the HINDUTVA ideology

- Hatered for the Christians.



This is just a seudo - Taliban movement. All it has is hatered for others. No positive contribution. That is a reason they are not and will never be in Majority. Ideology of hatered has few followers and is always shortlived.



Try to be construtive and contribute something to the nation. Changing street names of city names is NOT progess.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:BJP/VHP/Hindutva Movement Driven by Hatered...
by excelwin on Sep 15, 2007 09:13 PM  Permalink
Fine they breed in hatred. But what love do Indian Muslims have for India? They think, breathe and love Pakistan. So why not move to Jannat, and leave the communals to their lot in god forsaken India?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:BJP/VHP/Hindutva Movement Driven by Hatered...
by Milind on Sep 15, 2007 09:13 PM  Permalink
I totaly disagree with you. Infact arrogant converts like your are improving BJPs popularity.





   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:BJP/VHP/Hindutva Movement Driven by Hatered...
by Ahimsa on Sep 15, 2007 09:28 PM  Permalink
Muslims are driven by hatred towards all the non beleivers.



Where ever they live they live as seperatists.



In India they are against hindus, hindu culture.



Recently muslims opposed a high coart decision on Gita as National Dharma Grantha.



There is no comparison for Taiban and RSS.



RSS is a natioanlist organisation striving for unity of Hindus and preserving the tradition and culture of Bharath. There is nothing destructive in this organisation.



Taliban exactly reflects the mindset of ISLAM killing and destructing any thing that is not islam.



Yes we need to be constructive. Muslims renamed Bhaga nagar as to Hyderabad.

Karnavathi to Ahmedabad.

prayag to ALLAHA bad.

Sambhajinagar to Aurangabad

indraprastha to Delhi

3/4 of punjab to Pakistan



Erasing the old name culture and replacing and renamic is typical of semetic/desert religions like Islam and Christianity.



Mind it Imran.



Reject Islam for ur own good.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:BJP/VHP/Hindutva Movement Driven by Hatered...
by excelwin on Sep 15, 2007 09:32 PM  Permalink
By rejecting Islam a Kattu cant become a Hindu!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:BJP/VHP/Hindutva Movement Driven by Hatered...
by amit jain on Sep 15, 2007 11:27 PM  Permalink
by cutoff you become more pure, and its easy to sleep with 4 wives. only you have to scratch more, every 2 minutes.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:@Sanjay
by Save Hinduism on Sep 15, 2007 09:07 PM  Permalink
Yes in fact all the teem pregnancies are by the holy ghost. Next time your gaughter gets pregnant think it was the holy ghost..It certainly would be a compliment...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:RE:@Sanjay
by excelwin on Sep 15, 2007 09:17 PM  Permalink
Was Ten Commandments fact or fiction?
Can the Romans who rule India respond?e

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The Destruction of Rama Sethu and its implications
by KKA on Sep 15, 2007 08:53 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

By: Dr.Dipak Basu

http://www.ivarta.com/columns/070718-Rama-Sethu-man-made.htm

Excerpt :Prof. Padmanabha Rao, former head of the Radiation Safety Group& Deputy Director, Defense Laboratory (DRDO) in Jodhpur, Rajasthan has the opinion that Ramayana has mentioned five different types of human races apart from the north Indian Aryans. They were 1. Vanaras; 2. Golanguls; 3. Rukshyas; 4. Gradhru; 5. Rakshasas. Apart from the Rakshasas other four types of human races helped Rama to built the bridge. In Europe we have the evidence that Neanderthal, who were almost human but not human, existed side by side with the human in ancient time. In ancient India too, there were several near-human races apart from the human race. The origin of the human settlement in Sri Lanka in about 1.7 million years ago corresponds to the year when according to the Purana Rama first went to Sri Lanka. The Bridge, according to NASA, was also constructed at about 1.7 million years ago.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 6129 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85   Older >   >>
Write a message