We can deny rama as a Avtara, but even then it is a idol for crores of people. Today who are taking about Rama as their god dont have any good quality which Lord Rama is having. Ramrajya is a big dream for many centuries but it cannot be a true in today's situation. Those who critisises Rama they are just spiting on Sun. The supporters and critics both are very cheap personalities doing it for their own benefits. The image of Lord Rama is very high. It doesnt required any guard since no cheap person can spoil it. As far as the Bridge is concern if someof us feel that it is constructed by Rama to take his Army to Lanka, the Army bridges can be distroyed after the purpose is served. The bridge is not in use and therefore there is no wrong in breaking or distroying it. The religious sentiments are not at all attached to it of majority of Hindus who are the real devotees of Lord Rama. The persons who are making isssue of it are not the real hindus, they are selfish politicians have no caracter, they are not pure hindus as they are using Lord Rama for thier personal benefits. Lord Rama has transform Monkeys in to Human beings and here these nonsense leaders are transforming Human beings in to Monkeys. The Politicians are dengerous than RAVANA.
For Example in western countries, to get one glass of milk
Few Scientists gathers and arrives for Milk powder by establishing olant and machinary by engaging civil, mechanical and electrical engineers.
Then marketing, sales and finally a consumer can enjoy that too artificial milk.
Whereas in India the people by worshiping cow are enjoying pure nad natural milk.
India is ment for culture and abundant
natural resources with mixture of culture gives a happy and properous life.
Respecting elders, relatives, brothers sisters friends and even servants is learned from Ramayana and personality develops by following the character of Rama.
During stone age people were living peacefully (I guess) in India. People didn't have to work at that time. Now every one works at least 40-50 hours a week.
In stone age, there was no dress. So there is no need to wash the dress.
In stone age people didn't have to cook. They ate natural foods.
People lived in caves. So they don't have to worry about cleaning houses.
Most of the people who got sick, died. So there was no need for hospitals. We don't have to worry about population problem because of high death rate.
All the problem started, when scientific approach started to overtake Indians. It is time to abandon science and go back to stone ages.
RE:Science is killing India ..
by RAVINDRA BHOSALE on Sep 27, 2007 09:09 PM Permalink
If you really want to have the stone age, vote BJP alone, without NDA, give them full power they will take you in stone age in 5 years.
RE:RE:Science is killing India ..
by biju nair on Sep 27, 2007 09:40 PM Permalink
You vote Congress in to power with three fourth majority in India. They will make India another Taliban by welcoming all Pakis and Bangladeshis. Eventually India will become the Arabian desert which was there 1428 year ago.
RE:Science is killing India ..
by Krishna on Sep 28, 2007 07:58 PM Permalink
thats why country state is so bad. Kashmir, China, corruption sab congress ki hi den hai.. If Rajiv was convited for Bofors if would have set example that even PM is not spared for corruptuon..
RE:Science is killing India ..
by abhimanyu on Sep 29, 2007 03:58 PM Permalink
The congress idiots are the reason why India has kept on being a poor nation and undeveloped state even though we possess abundant manpower resources and natural resources.
The BJP came into power, and within 5 years created the GOLDEN QUADRILATERAL which unified India further and created more roads than what the congress was able to do in the last 50 years or so.
If you think God created or Hindu religion/ philosophy created it.. Thats absolutely wrong.
God treats all individuals alike who follow the path of righteousness laid down by Him. Come what may his/her caste or creed be; HIS eyes of grace and blessing is alike to one and all. Examples are shabari, Guha, Vibeeshana, Sugreeva and so on where considered so dear to Lord Sri Rama. Valmiki Ramayana only speaks of values for individuals to follow and none other than that.
A person born into a certain caste is based on His/ Her purva samskaara. i.e., the good and bad he/she did in his/her previous birth. That decides his future which is his next birth. THis is not biased/ God given nor any bane of Hindu Society. This can be paralleled to a person committing a henious crime in society in his current birth and getting jailed for life. He can't expect to go work as a Chief Justice of Supreme Court.
While caste demarcates these differences in how individual souls are over births, it doesnt differentiate people in front of God. For all are God's own.
RE:Who created Caste System?
by Ravi V on Sep 27, 2007 03:54 PM Permalink
Using caste system for ones own benefit is a sin and such person will suitably be rewarded in full in his next birth. He can be born in an upper caste due to his good deeds.. but the wrong he is doing by bragging about his current status and suppressing other beings will put him at the level he is destined to in his next life and this will go on.
An individual conscious of this will steer clear from this and carry out his deeds/ duties destined for him in the righteous way and soon attain salvation from this cycle of birth and death. People beware of your duties and live life the way it should be lived. There will be no hatred and anger. Evil minded will be dealt with for their intentions in the way suitable for them. Hindu dharma stands only for Dharma and none other. While it shows both sides and there being no hidden agenda, its for the mind and brain in man that needs to choose the right side and live on that.
RE:Who created Caste System?
by MP Raju on Sep 27, 2007 05:47 PM Permalink
Don't worry, now onwards, who does good will be born to backward caste and who does bad will be born into uppercaste family. :D
RE:Who created Caste System?
by SRI KUMAR on Sep 27, 2007 08:19 PM Permalink
Caste is created according to the profession of a person
A man by birth is not Intelligent
As per his mentality he chooses his work
Based on their work and thier effort on work, Taste is created and according to the taste, food habit is created and according to the food digests his mind works and according to his mind, he works and chain starts again.
According to the similarity of taste, a group is created and they catogarized it,seperated, continued and followed.
RE:RE:Who created Caste System?
by S Anto on Sep 28, 2007 03:09 PM Permalink
wat a explanation .very nice sri kumar but other hindus are not accpeting this. but one doubt how can one caste block another caste to enter into temple?? lord Krishna taught that?
RE:Who created Caste System?
by SRI KUMAR on Sep 29, 2007 03:17 PM Permalink
It is understood that food habits and taste is the root cause of the Caste.
One may feel inconvenient to stay very close to a smoker or a drunkard. Accordingly the food digests and excretes from the body,
In the excretion process a lot of waste is released according to the consumption of food.
Important to note is Smoking is better that smoking the smoke from the smoker.
Temples meant for purity and it attracts the positive rays from the sun and accordingly it is built. One who visits the temple can gain the positive rays.
Water in the copper container is different from water in other containers One who visits the temple should be pure. Purity in the sense not only physically but also mentally
God is the incarnation of truth and positive nature especially a giver
One who have the qualities of giving ness and qualities of positive nature and honesty are treated as god.
No one objects in visiting temple. It is those who feels guilty among themselves are not visiting temples.
RE:Who created Caste System?
by Rationalist on Sep 28, 2007 06:48 AM Permalink
Wow, justification for dividing Hindus in the name of Caste for the past 5000 years
Sensitivity of the 'aam aadmi' ki sarkar!....lazy farmers die in greed!
by maino gandi on Sep 27, 2007 03:13 PM Permalink | Hide replies
Quite recently, Union Minister Shankarsinh Vaghela and Maharashtra Chief Minister, Vilasrao Deshmukh spoke that the despondency among the Vidharbha farmers leading them to commit suicide is due to the fact that they are lazy and greedy. An instant reaction to the ``observations'' will be to recall Mary Antoinette's infamous observation that if the people did not have bread, they must eat cake.
And it is possible then to also proceed with a comment that the Congress (I) is certain to meet the same fate as the French rulers. Well. We now live in a ``mature'' democracy and hence Vaghela and Deshmukh will just end up losing power in the next elections unlike the French aristocracy whose heads were placed on the guillotine. We do not live in that age where the struggle to establish democracy witnessed such systematic execution of those who belonged to the old order.
But then, the fact that the ``observations'' did not kick up a row and the demand that Vaghela and Deshmukh resign for being so insensitive is indeed a cause for concern. The silence is indeed deafening!
It is, however, possible to look at the issue a little dispassionately and even agree with the two Congress (I) luminaries on a limited point: That the farmers led themselves to this situation because they were keen on earning more than what they were earning and hence adopted capital intensive farming methods. This began in the mid-Sixties with the stress on fertilizer and such other ``advanced'' farm p
RE:Sensitivity of the 'aam aadmi' ki sarkar!....lazy farmers die in greed!
by maino gandi on Sep 27, 2007 03:15 PM Permalink
Well, the explicit purpose behind that shift in policies %u2013 to promote use of fertilizers and other ``advanced'' farming methods %u2013 was essentially a reaction to the famine and food-shortage that hit most parts of the country due to the monsoons failing for two years (1963-64). That was also the time when use of technology was seen as a means to liberation of the human race in all walks of life. And that was also the time when the developed nations were desperate to make money out of selling such technology to the developing countries.
``Science helps build a new India'' screamed a Union Carbide advertisement in National Geographic, in April 1962. That particular advertisement also had this sub-text: ``Oxen working in the fields%u2026 the eternal river Ganges%u2026 jeweled elephants on parade. Today these symbols of ancient India exist side by side with a new sight %u2013 modern industry. India has developed bold new plans to build its economy and bring the promise of a bright future to its more than 400,000,000 people. But India needs the technical knowledge of the western world%u2026''. The Bhopal plant of this MNC giant was a product of this celebration of technology masquerading as science.
And on December 3, 1984, this fertilizer plant was the cause for the death of several hundred people, the incapacitation of a few thousands and the killing of many in the mothers' womb for a long time after the ``accident''. This new culture of celebrating technology also brought such men as Ottavio
RE:RE:RE:Sensitivity of the 'aam aadmi' ki sarkar!....lazy farmers die in greed!
by maino gandi on Sep 27, 2007 03:18 PM Permalink
it was this culture that looked at chemical fertilizers and pesticides as the liberators of the Indian people that is ultimately responsible for the incidence of suicides in large numbers in Andhra Pradesh, Vidharbha, Wayanad and many other parts of India in the past decade.
This celebration of technology as the liberating force guided our own policy makers to push this idea among the farmers. All that ended up in the ``green'' revolution. Farm production increased several times and this included a rise in the production and availability of food grains too. There were voices of dissent against this indiscriminate use of fertilizers even at that time. These, however, were drowned in the euphoria of India having achieved food-security and that the tragedy of the Sixties were, for once, a thing of the past.
The most active voice in favour of this technology-driven-farming came from Sharad Joshi. With his un-qualified celebration of this culture in the farm sector, Joshi was able to mobilize the farmers to agitate and demand access to the more recent ``technology'' in the farm sector. Joshi teamed up with the MNC giants, now engaged in Genetically Modified (GM) seeds and other such ``advanced'' technology and succeeded in convincing the farmer in the Vidharbha region to ``progress''. The easy access to loans, as long as they were intended to promote the synthetic fertilizer industry and the GM seeds, gave the impetus to the farmer to give up his conventional wisdom.
RE:RE:Sensitivity of the 'aam aadmi' ki sarkar!....lazy farmers die in greed!
by maino gandi on Sep 27, 2007 03:17 PM Permalink
it was this culture that looked at chemical fertilizers and pesticides as the liberators of the Indian people that is ultimately responsible for the incidence of suicides in large numbers in Andhra Pradesh, Vidharbha, Wayanad and many other parts of India in the past decade.
This celebration of technology as the liberating force guided our own policy makers to push this idea among the farmers. All that ended up in the ``green'' revolution. Farm production increased several times and this included a rise in the production and availability of food grains too. There were voices of dissent against this indiscriminate use of fertilizers even at that time. These, however, were drowned in the euphoria of India having achieved food-security and that the tragedy of the Sixties were, for once, a thing of the past.
The most active voice in favour of this technology-driven-farming came from Sharad Joshi. With his un-qualified celebration of this culture in the farm sector, Joshi was able to mobilize the farmers to agitate and demand access to the more recent ``technology'' in the farm sector. Joshi teamed up with the MNC giants, now engaged in Genetically Modified (GM) seeds and other such ``advanced'' technology and succeeded in convincing the farmer in the Vidharbha region to ``progress''. The easy access to loans, as long as they were intended to promote the synthetic fertilizer industry and the GM seeds, gave the impetus to the farmer to give up his conventional wisdom.
RE:do you know?
by ram on Sep 27, 2007 03:43 PM Permalink
yes she converts to christian.and my more change . i think we should bring all there converter in one ground and put to fire. Bolo jai ram ki....
RE:do you know?
by Makha on Sep 28, 2007 11:59 AM Permalink
So is Rajashekar Reddy, CM of AP. I know many converted Christians continue to keep their Hindu cast titles as Reddy in their name such. Did you know that a converted Reddy Christian will never marry to a converted SC Christian! How interesting!!! So caste system prevails even after conversions.
RE:do you know?
by S Anto on Sep 28, 2007 03:13 PM Permalink
hi sentimental idiots, All Christians in this world are converted only. Not only the VIPs u mentioned here lakhs of hindus are following christian religion in India.That can not be stopped .u fools should understand that Christians and jews are ruling the entire world including India
RE:do you know?
by Krishna on Sep 28, 2007 08:09 PM Permalink
who the hell says Christians rule India.,. Except one Italian the Country is ruled by Indians.. Our religion is at our home and these Italian masters want to destroy that and don't let us live in peace..
I can't imagine, Ram is just imagination and thats said not in West or Pakistan but by our own government.. Just ask a common man and u will get reply.. It is really painful to hear this..But as always we are patient.. But I will wish brutal death to all those who are behind this.. Ram is our God and nobody can make joke on that. We live by that and we die by that only.. We give respect and expect same from others as well.. Just imagine if i say Allah or Jesus is just a joke nothing more than that in Saudi Arabia or US will u be spared.??. Its bcoz we belive in Ram that such ignorant peopl are seeing the sunrise next day..
RE:do you know?
by S Anto on Sep 28, 2007 03:14 PM Permalink
THE ONLY WAY THAT INDIA TO BECOME DEVELOPED COUNTRY IS ATLEAST 75 % OF PEOPLE SHOULD BE CHRISTIANS IN INDIA
RE:do you know?
by on Sep 28, 2007 04:29 PM Permalink
Go to hell with ur advice. we want to develop by all ways not only by wealth.for this hinduism is must.its way of living. by 75% christians we do not want to be pschyco or gays...
Did the brainwashing school not tell you about Africa
Maybe a little refresher on their history and destruction culturally and economically after the missionaries "brought these people to Christ".
Check the history of the Phillipines, one of the most evangelised places in Asia
Do you know what they say in Africa " before the missionaries cam, we had the land. Now we have the Bible and they have the land" What a skewed view of the world
RE:do you know?
by Patriot on Sep 28, 2007 10:26 AM Permalink
Yes.. these converts should change their name.. even muthuvel karunanidhi is a Christian; whereas the name 'muthuvel' is symbolic of hindu deity skanda/murugan/subramanian. Infact this karunanidhi could loose elections if it were to be known that he is non-hindu. There are many more rajasekhara reddy is also a christian convert.. There is a lot in the name
I am a westerner and a born Christian. I was mainly brought up in catholic schools, my uncle, Father Guy Gautier, a gem of a man, was the parish head of the beautiful Saint Jean de Montmartre church in Paris ; my father, Jacques Gautier, a famous artist in France, and a truly good person if there ever was one, was a fervent catholic all his life, went to church nearly every day and lived by his Christian values. There are certain concepts in Christianity I am proud of : charity for others, the equality of system in many western countries, Christ%u2019s message of love and compassion%u2026.
Yet, I am a little uneasy when I see how much Christianity is taking over India under the reign of Sonia Gandhi : according to a 2001 census, there are about 2.34 million Christians in India ; not even 2,5% of the nation, a negligible amount. Yet there are today five Christian chief ministers in Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Kerala and Andhra Pradesh. One should add that the majority of politicians in Sonia Gandhi%u2019s closed circle are either Christians or Muslims. She seems to have no confidence in Hindus.Ambika Soni, a Christian, is General Secretary of the Congress and a very powerful person, with close access to Sonia Gandhi. Oscar Fernandes is Union Programme Implementation Minister. Margaret Alwa is the eminence grise of Maharasthra. Karnataka is virtually controlled by AK Anthony, whose secretaries are all from the Southern Chr
RE:RE:NOTE BY FRANCOIS GAUTIER - MUST READ
by biju nair on Sep 27, 2007 11:01 PM Permalink
Christians are working hard in India. They had undertaken a big project which is two fold.
1.Convert all Hindus to Christianity. 2. Destroy all forests in India.
1. What will happen when all Hindus are converted in to Christianity?
It will be easier transition from Christianity to Islam than Hindu to Islam(See how fast Christians in the west are converting in to Muslims).
Hindu concept of God is entirely different from that of Christianity and Islam. The concept of aftermath of death is entirely different. Hindu philosophy has four options after death 1. Rebirth 2. Heaven 3. Hell 4. Salvation. Rebirth can happen immediately and same is the case of other three options also.
Islam and Christianity says the dead will be resurrected at the end of the world and will be given either Heaven or Hell as per their belief in Christ or Muhammad. Islam says only Muhammad believers will be allowed to Heaven and Christian believers say the opposite. So the selection is very simple just like tossing a coin.Ultimately India will become Islamic. So what is the role of Christian missionaries in India? They are doing exactly the same as John the baptist did with only one difference here instead of Christ Muhammad is going to come.
2. Destroying the forest coverage.
They started their job from Kerala. More than 20% of Kerala was forest some during the state formation. Now the forest is less than 8% the rest is with Christians of Kerala captured legally and illegally with the help of
RE:NOTE BY FRANCOIS GAUTIER - MUST READ
by biju nair on Sep 27, 2007 11:03 PM Permalink
strong Christian religious organizations of Kerala and Christian political parties and converted to Tea and other crops like Ganja. They are making quick money by destroying the nature. Their religious organizations give all help and advice to destroy the forest.
Finally India will become like the Arabian Desert of 1428 years back. Hence literally arranging perfect stage for an Islamic India.
yesterday i watched national geography channel in which it was showing that how the earth was born(some gas clouds met together and at the end, the high pressure attain consequently the cluster form of gas bursted which produced so many particles(compare to the universe earth is a particle). this is science, but in puranas(story)it has been reeled that earth was produced by god. obviously jesus born and served for oppressed people to come out from slaveness. my opinion jesus also not a god but he was living as superhero and died for people. he can be thanked throught our life. nabi also was living as human and spread amidts people good thoughts but he used god name that he(god) only sent him(nabi) to spread these things, because, only then the people will hear, thatswhy he used god name(allah). but allah i dont know. budha,mahavir,gurunanak,mkg... they were living and did good thing for people. but who is ram and what he did for people espepcially suppressed people i dont know.
RE:RE:on god
by prashant sharma on Sep 27, 2007 12:01 PM Permalink
how can u know? u dont have the brains for it. by the way your english needs serious working on dude. Lord Ram ate fruits from Shabri, a tribal. He made best friends with A boatman of low caste. He did these things as he wanted to show that the lord des not believe in evil like caste system. All these stories about shambukha killed by Lord RAM are ENTIRELY FALSE. There is NOT A SINGLE REFERENCE in valmiki Ramayan. This is just demonic propaganda. Then the Lord gave this world ideals of being a devoted son, who went to forest. he killed the evil DEMONS like Ravana and kumbhkarna and SAVED THE WORLD FROM THEIR ATRCITIES. Then he showed the world the power of MERCY, by returning LANKA to VIBHSHANA. The lord could have kept Lanka, but he said, I DONOT BELIEVE IN TAKING OVER OTHE KINGDOMS AND MAKING THEM SLAVES. This is a principle which India still follows. The crux of the matter is that beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder! If you look at A STONE with faith yOU will see GOD. IFYOU LOOK AT EVEN LORD RAM WITH THE HATE FED TO YOU SINCE YOUR CHILDHOOD,YOU WILL SEE THE SAME HATRED THAT YOU FEEL.
RE:on god
by Manickam on Sep 27, 2007 12:59 PM Permalink
if you copy and paste a untruth message again and again that cannot become a true. whether ravana was treating the lankans as slave? if rama killed ravana because of ravana misbehavier, then where was rama when the people were tortured by hitler?(you could have read what type of torture mr.hitler did on people, especially even he did not left one or two year old babies.) who also should have been punished by ur god. in history there are so many incidents in so many places like what and how hitler tortured people. e.g mughals when capturing and during ruling india they forced the people for conversion(religious), britishers invation and torture of people for conversion. where were ur god? these e.gs which are taken place within two thousand years. whether ur god requires yugas to take next incornation? then, what about these history worst incidents!! think and give answer, dont panic, cool and answer, if it is true i am going to accept provided it is proven. my english may be misaligned but u can understand my point.
If you do not belive in Ram or God ,it is up to you. But one thing certain if u say Ram and Ramayan is Fake only Myths ,then why so many Temples which are built thousands of years old are still in our country.Do you think that is also fake.Also God - Ram never born as God he is being glorified as God becuase of his Golrifying deeds during is life time.So many of you many of you may have born (including my self) during the time of Gandhiji or Swami Veivekananda and Ramakrishna Pramahamsha and Ramalingam swamigal and Ragevendra Swamigal and Shirdi Sai Baba. But your forefathers might have seen them.You mean to say they not Godly peopel.If you say like that,then how do you know who is your father or mother.(even DNA test can say only clad not you are exactly born to your mother or father) If you trust your father as your father then Ram also God,if you trust your as your mother then RAm is God. Sorry I havn't written in offensive way.For athesit this is one of the way to prove about God
RE:on god
by Manickam on Sep 28, 2007 11:36 AM Permalink
mr. ashish singh you just read encyclopedia about ramayana in which cleary written that the period of ramayana when it is written by valmiki. sita also lived with valmiki. the period of battle between ravana and rama has been stated lakhs of years ago. you just understand my point which tells the confliction of periods. still if you say the people that time lived long(about lakhs of years), then i just withdraw everything. i cannot argue with blind mind.
RE:on god
by ashish singh on Oct 01, 2007 08:55 PM Permalink
Dear Mnickchem, Ok I am blind mind come to science, Can u answer these questions ,what is magnetism?? Who controls heart beating and nervous system?? what is death??
Same way my point is who told to Valmiki or Tulsidas in the ancient period to write these type of proofs like Ramsetu presense, Bermuda tringle like place presense etc. Who had given exact geographical info to Valmiki and Tulsidas in Ramayana (In your view Ramayana Story). Boss think about that period even period before some thousand years no body was aware about this whole world, how that guy (Valmiki and Tulsidas) knew all those things. I am not telling you blindly believe on Ram, but try to search some mystries on Ramayana.
RE:on god
by Manickam on Sep 28, 2007 10:57 AM Permalink
mr.sundaram, i have read about our father of nation and his character which i follow very much. i have read about swami's vivek,parama,ramalinga who have tought people good thoughts which require for human life. i seen my mother who shown my father(dont say father is a belief like rama which can be very much suitable for u and ur fraternity). if DNA is not much clear evidence then how some cases like two mother own one child was adjudged. if dna can be ploughed then there will be so much confusion. i have seen my grandfather-mother. if i have to know my forefathers then i have to ask my grandpa. it may be(about forefathers) available in notes also. i am from south i know so many filthy languages. mind it.
RE:on god
by Manickam on Sep 28, 2007 10:56 AM Permalink
mr.sundaram, i have read about our father of nation and his character which i follow very much. i have read about swami's vivek,parama,ramalinga who have tought people good thoughts which require for human life. i seen my mother who shown my father(dont say father is a belief like rama which can be very much suitable for u and ur fraternity). if DNA is not much clear evidence then how some cases like two mother own one child was adjudged. if dna can be ploughed then there will be so much confusion. i have seen my grandfather-mother. if i have to know my forefathers then i have to ask my grandpa. it may be(about forefathers) available in notes also. i am from south i know so many filthy languages. mind it.
RE:on god
by shubhankar sharma on Sep 27, 2007 01:05 PM Permalink
where was christ when hitler was torturing jews? where was virgin mary when mughals massacred lakhs? do youget the point? Gods job is not to be everywhere at all the time! in case of hitler the lord lent his strenghth to the british and americans. in case of mughals, the lord lent his strength to guru gobind singh and shivaji. the lord will come when the time is ripe. when evil becomes so strong that a reincarnation is needed SUCH WAS THE CASE WITH RAVANA. your question was so idiotic that i had difficulty in answering but i did nevertheless. You call Ram 'My God' who is yours manickam? do you have a 'God'? Is it jesus now? or have you left the idea of god behind and started the climb up the mountain of atheists? Now my answer was VERY COOL. Depends on your udnerstanding from here on!
RE:on god
by Manickam on Sep 27, 2007 02:07 PM Permalink
u just read my statement(in white) about jesus. virgin mary i dont know who is this? u people have said god is everywhere, he will be in piller as well as grass-straw. 'hitler was beaten by joint strength' u have agreed, this is what i am also telling everything in mans hand. shivaji, guru fought against mughal and tired and died but mughals ruling was cont.. what is the time of ripe. ravana ruled well srilanka and also he was a lord siva devottee!! only he misbehaved with sita, this is wrong of course. if this the reason why rama came as avatar purusa, is it justice? in this case how many rape has been being taking place all over the world for which god should be always here as avatar purusa. ok my friends thank you.
RE:on god
by ashish singh on Sep 27, 2007 04:37 PM Permalink
Dear Manikchem You should read Ramayana first then ask these type of questions, You know the time when Ramayana was written? before 14lakh years (Now you will say in Zurasic period, how they knew the presense of Ramsetu,according to NASA the age of Ramsetu is same as written in Ramayana, how they knew some place in sea where every thing pulls towards sea (read Sunderkand in Ramayana)and also about Bermuda Triangle, What you think about Brahmastra and other Vaans hit by Ram and others is this similer to misiles or not, what you think about Vimans of Ravan and Kuber is this similer to todays Aeroplanes. About God, Ram, Mohammad Sahab, Gurunanak, Buddha, I want to say you every body having a power with himself that is God, Ram....etc. If you are sure with your inner power god will save you.
Please read ramayana once, this is my request to you.
RE:on god
by prashant sharma on Sep 27, 2007 12:01 PM Permalink
how can u know? u dont have the brains for it. by the way your english needs serious working on dude. Lord Ram ate fruits from Shabri, a tribal. He made best friends with A boatman of low caste. He did these things as he wanted to show that the lord des not believe in evil like caste system. All these stories about shambukha killed by Lord RAM are ENTIRELY FALSE. There is NOT A SINGLE REFERENCE in valmiki Ramayan. This is just demonic propaganda. Then the Lord gave this world ideals of being a devoted son, who went to forest. he killed the evil DEMONS like Ravana and kumbhkarna and SAVED THE WORLD FROM THEIR ATRCITIES. Then he showed the world the power of MERCY, by returning LANKA to VIBHSHANA. The lord could have kept Lanka, but he said, I DONOT BELIEVE IN TAKING OVER OTHE KINGDOMS AND MAKING THEM SLAVES. This is a principle which India still follows. The crux of the matter is that beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder! If you look at A STONE with faith yOU will see GOD. IFYOU LOOK AT EVEN LORD RAM WITH THE HATE FED TO YOU SINCE YOUR CHILDHOOD,YOU WILL SEE THE SAME HATRED THAT YOU FEEL.