RE:Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project must Continue!!!
by Gentleman Gentleman on Sep 15, 2007 12:29 AM Permalink
My Dear Scientist,
Please mind your words...traffic is something that has appeared in the recent times..and remember that Traffic was made around Gurudwara/temple/mosque...its not that these places of worship are being constructed now in the mid of the road...dont just say words that doesnt make any sense...refrain yourself in making statements like the above...
To all those ignorant people...please refer to the Vishnu Sahstranama Sthotra, you will understand how powerful RAMA word itself is...I pity these politicians and people who are unable to understand the greatness.Shame on the part of our nation that we dont believe in our own epics and dis regard them...may god bless everyone!!!
It's great.After the welknown book"ARISE ARJUNA" by the French journalist,this journalist from Bharat has worked a marvelous piece of write-up. Somehow history of Bharat starts only after the British planned the Education system of INDIA. So at least after British India became BHARAT, the Bharatiyas should have modified the system firstly by introducing the original language of BHARAT,namely,"Sanskrit" for National Integration of all Bharatiya cityzen.This is because even the State Department of US on record states about Sanskrit,that this language still exists in all the states of India in various forms.And asked for choice,says that neither English nor Hindi will ever be the National Language of India. As seen,Britishers could change geography of India,by carving two more nations from the main land with Religion and National Language.But history cannot be changed by keeping BHARAT secular without its secular Sanskrit language.This language of GEETA is the original language of BHARAT. To go a little further,the words "SATYA MEVA JAYATE" still exist in all the courts of Bharat. Damodar(Shyam)Vinayak Bale. Mumbai.
RE:Denying Rama
by zaheen usmani on Sep 14, 2007 11:38 PM Permalink
Shankaryacharya was arrested in the case of murder and on bail now,murder ocassionally used to happen in differents temples and worship place for money.
Beside this south indian are not oppossing the Sethu samundarn,it is only BJP is doing in north to get some issues since north people are not educated as south they become fool easily and leader use them.
Beside this if seth samundaren hurt hindus sentiments its work shoul be stopped
RE:Denying Rama
by zaheen usmani on Sep 14, 2007 11:53 PM Permalink
not,What ASI says about ram ? learn to talk first mosques has no time to discuss useless issues muslims do not worship any king, superpower saints lands trees mountains animals etc.
RE:RE:Denying Rama
by imran patel on Sep 14, 2007 11:55 PM Permalink
Just as the Commies opposed the Nuclear deal...The BJP is opposing this project (Which itself approved when in Power)...to APPEASE its voter base...
Project is in the interest of India...so are you Indian or Hindu ???
RE:Denying Rama
by Atul on Sep 14, 2007 11:51 PM Permalink
Mr. usmani I appreciate that you have tried to understand Indian greats, by mentioning Lord Ram, Krishna, Nanak, Buddha, Chisti amongts others. But like many others you have half baked knowledge. Ramayana was written by Rishi Valmiki who is worshipped by the Hindus whom you called schedule caste. Lord Ram ate from the hands of Shabri and was very appreciaive of Kevat. All whom you consider as schedule castes. There are many other things that this 'idol worshipper' can tell you, the one who worships Allah the formless God whom I also worship as Nirakar Brahm. you perhaps tnink the idol worshipers or human god worshippers are perhaps a little inferior. Beleive me in the eyes of almighty there is no difference between you and me. Or a Brhamin and a sudra or Muslim or christian.
RE:RE:Denying Rama
by zaheen usmani on Sep 14, 2007 11:58 PM Permalink
There is no difference in human all are equal I know lord Rama ate from the mouth of shabri and even the Vaner Sena I think were people of Jungles Rama did not prevailed any descrimination unfortunatily His follower is not doing so I have never listened the name Shabri of any person of any caste upper or lower.People should keep name shabri to show respect to Rama
RE:RE:RE:Denying Rama
by Hari G on Sep 15, 2007 12:31 AM Permalink
yes Ram ate from a scheduled caste... and mingled with inferior stone age men(vanar sena).
but mohammad killed and gave supari to kill non-muslims.
better convert to hinduism.
its beter to worship monkey gods than to kill innocents on the name of jihad.
convert back to ur fore fathers religion and be peaceful at Urself
RE:RE:RE:Denying Rama
by zaheen usmani on Sep 15, 2007 12:00 AM Permalink
There is no difference in human all are equal I know lord Rama ate from the mouth of shabri and even the Vaner Sena I think were people of Jungles Rama did not prevailed any descrimination unfortunatily His follower is not doing so I have never listened the name Shabri of any person of any caste upper or lower.People should keep name shabri to show respect to Rama
