Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 6129 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125   Older >   >>
Excellent Article Tarun
by ravishankar thyagarajan on Sep 15, 2007 07:12 AM  Permalink 

Heart felt article reflecting the sympathies of the Hindu Public
COngrats

    Forward  |  Report abuse
did Jesus and Mohmmad existed?
by TandooriRasamKadhi rosgula on Sep 15, 2007 07:02 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Did Jesus and Mohmmad existed too? I have not seen any evidence yest except that people worship them, just like rama and Krishna

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:did Jesus and Mohmmad existed?
by sameer on Sep 15, 2007 08:09 AM  Permalink
yes they existed ,check any historical records,prophet mohammed to even prohet abrham have thier grave.we have dates set to christ birth .may be u should study history

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:did Jesus and Mohmmad existed?
by riir on Sep 15, 2007 08:26 AM  Permalink
dont bullshit...there is no archeological/proof for their existence. here is more information for you

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_jesus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Muhammad

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:did Jesus and Mohmmad existed?
by Jesus Christ on Sep 15, 2007 08:24 AM  Permalink
which scientist using which carbon dating mehthod has proved that it was jesus or peadophile mohammed.

which scinetist has recorded that a woman called mary gave birth as a virgin. how can a virgin give birth to abay. Only ignorant people of some desert can beleive it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:did Jesus and Mohmmad existed?
by anil mahajan on Sep 15, 2007 11:11 AM  Permalink
Dear I am sorry. Sameer is right. I dont know whether christ exist or not. Though highly doubful as he was born of a virgin mother. But I am sure Muhammad did exist otherwise where from hav all these terrorist come. They are all his creation.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:did Jesus and Mohmmad existed?
by srinivasan Murugesa on Sep 15, 2007 12:09 PM  Permalink
I did not know that Christ told the whole world to change the calender the day he was born. I was told it was done many years later after Christ died, that some followers wanted to change history the way they changed history saying Columbus discovered America.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sonia's hidden agenda.
by Vishnu Sharma on Sep 15, 2007 06:57 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

http://arkabala.sulekha.com/blog/post/2007/02/god-save-hinduism.htm

She formed an alliance with the DMK leader Karunanidhi inspite of his being indicted by Jain commission in Rajiv Murder case, and was a known sympathizer of LTTE at the time of Rajiv%u2019s murder and afterwards, only because Karunanidhi is a well known Hindu baiter known for his maniacal hatred for Hindu religion.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:Sonia's hidden agenda.
by anil mahajan on Sep 15, 2007 11:13 AM  Permalink
That is why she is collaborating with karuna Nidhi as he helped Sonia get rid of Rajiv so she could rule

   Forward   |   Report abuse
'Lord Ram was born in 5114 BC'
by Vishnu Sharma on Sep 15, 2007 06:47 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=273107
After researching on Shri Ram, I do believe he's a man who walked the earth in flesh and blood. There is an essential difference between the Valmiki Ramayana and the Tulsi Ramayana. Tulsidas was a devotee who looked up to Ram, but Valmiki was a contemporary. Valmiki has written Ram's life-history, as a biographer does - he's a contemporary of Ram, and this is not very different from what happens all over the world. Kings have always had their life-history written.

There's been a very strange development in the media and the people of India. We have started seeing ancient India as something equivalent to the word 'Hindu'. The very word Hindu came into circulation only after the advent of Islam in India. In Ramayana and the Vedas , there is no mention of the word 'Hindu'. At the most, there is only mention of terms like 'Aryavrat' or 'Bharatvarsh' and residents here are called as 'Aryans'. Since centuries, Christians, Muslims, Sikhs have been living in this country and it's their land as much as it is to a Hindu. Anything that has happened on this land in the past is their common heritage. But, unfortunately, politicians with vested interests have divided the people on artificial religious lines and making it appear that anything related to ancient India was perhaps related to Hindu, which is not the case and should not be the case.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:'Lord Ram was born in 5114 BC'
by Vishnu Sharma on Sep 15, 2007 06:49 AM  Permalink
Christians, Muslims, Sikhs have been living in this country and it's their land as much as it is to a Hindu. Anything that has happened on this land in the past is their common heritage AND THEY
SHOULD ACCEPT IS WITHOUT A MURMER OF PROTEST !!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:'Lord Ram was born in 5114 BC'
by srinivasan Murugesa on Sep 15, 2007 12:14 PM  Permalink
I dont think it is big deal if Valmiki and Tulsidas differed. Why, aren't there two bibles called old and new testament? Religion and God are faith and no one has a right to disturb it in any way in any country.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:RAM IS RAM
by TandooriRasamKadhi rosgula on Sep 15, 2007 07:06 AM  Permalink
Did Jesus and Mohmmad existed too? I have not seen any evidence yest except that people worship them, just like rama and Krishna



Unfortunate slaves of Phirang Sonia will sale this cuntry..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Ram is faith and faith is Ram
by TandooriRasamKadhi rosgula on Sep 15, 2007 07:04 AM  Permalink
Did jesus or Mohmmad ever existed? Do we need evidance for that?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ram is faith and faith is Ram
by sameer on Sep 15, 2007 08:11 AM  Permalink
yes they existed ,they were documented by every historian at that time

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Ram is faith and faith is Ram
by riir on Sep 15, 2007 08:27 AM  Permalink
dont bullshit...there is no archeological/proof for their existence. here is more information for you

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_jesus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Muhammad

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:O Rama
by on Sep 15, 2007 06:33 AM  Permalink
1.7 million years ago!!!gosh no wonder there are som many monkeys in the story!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Required Hindu Dictator in India
by jimmy on Sep 15, 2007 06:25 AM  Permalink
well said budy. In mullon ki to..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 6129 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125   Older >   >>
Write a message