RE:Allah who
by Mir Ali on Sep 15, 2007 04:34 PM Permalink
Brahmins always criticize, condemn and mock at other religions Their criticism and mocking is unreasonable and unacceptable.
In his autobiography, Dr Charles , an American scholar says that it is very simple to define a Hindu. He says a Hindu means "one who believes in anything and everything if said in the name of god and shall never question its authenticity".
The Brahmins claim that Lord Rama is incarnated (came in human form) to study and understand the difficulties of mankind. Is it really necessary for a god to incarnate Himself?? CAn he not understand the creation? Why should God become a donkey or a cockroach in order to understand the sufferings of these creatures?
RE:RE:Allah who
by Zabardast on Sep 15, 2007 03:38 PM Permalink
Allah dosent have a face . Atleast hindu gods have faces . so know what u think . No body has seen allah . atleast we can draw figures o our hindu gods . wht abt u stupid.Can u tell even if imaginery , how allah looks.
RE:logical question
by TrueWorrior on Sep 15, 2007 03:44 PM Permalink
by private jet.. hahahahahaha all the incidents are soo funny.. you will feel like laughing its just the characters of valmiki's frictious book ramayana.. and these fools think they are god!!! their gods are donkeys, monkeys, snake, ling (shiv toy),list goes on.. you will not belive whole world laughs at them.. ofcourse not openly infront of them..
RE:logical question
by CR Anand on Sep 15, 2007 03:38 PM Permalink
The sethu was for the vaanar troops to cross the ocean. Not for Ram or Hanuman (who crossed it by flight).
RE:IN HATE CLUB !!! WHO ???
by santosh mishra on Sep 15, 2007 03:51 PM Permalink
cracy funky do u know ur fathers name it may be ravana or kumkharan for clarification ask ur mother or go down and check
RE:RE:IN HATE CLUB !!! WHO ???
by santosh mishra on Sep 15, 2007 03:53 PM Permalink
cracy funky have read the message aboutur father i think he is kumkaran reply fast i want to go with ur sexy sister
This government is controlled by a foreigner who is not bothered about Hindu religious sentiments. The withdrawal of the affidavit is just an eyewash since it has become a controversial issue. HOW DARE THE GOVERNMENT QUESTION THE EXISTENCE OF LORD RAM. Will our PM Mr. Manmohan Singh coolly sit in his office and not do anything we were to say that Guru Nanak and Guru Gobind Singh are mythological characters and did not exist in reality?? The government simply takes Hindus for granted. Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh should apologise to the nation and drop the sethusamudram project immediately. It is time we Hndus unite and show to these politicians that they can't play around with our sentiments any longer.
Now now.. why are we making a issue of this? The government has done the commonsensical thing and changed its stand on the Ram Sethu. That is a good thing. In any case, who will believe that a bridge can be built by Monkeys and Squirrels? It is not Hindu sentiment. It is rubbish.
RE:A bridge built by monkeys and squirrels?
by savior on Sep 15, 2007 03:21 PM Permalink
You are lucky you are a hindu. If you were a muslim and said similarly about events in Prophet Mohammeds life, they would have beheaded or stoned you to death by now.
RE:A bridge built by monkeys and squirrels?
by Sameer Shisodia on Sep 15, 2007 03:28 PM Permalink
@savior, is the subtext of your message that we should change that ? Should being a Hindu stop meaning being flexible, open minded, all encompassing and having the right to a differing point of view ? Should we Hindus become narrow minded, chauvinistic, and our faith brittle - at threat at the slightest "offense" ? Think, sir.
RE:A bridge built by monkeys and squirrels?
by mindgod on Sep 15, 2007 06:08 PM Permalink
No we should not change that. But we should be couragious enough to point the selective targetting done and do what u can do to prevent a social imbalance created by political morons.
RE:A bridge built by monkeys and squirrels?
by savior on Sep 15, 2007 03:33 PM Permalink
That is a good point. I was just pointing out the freedom offered by Hindu religion.
RE:RE:Sunita Williams converted to Islam
by kartikey singh on Sep 15, 2007 03:26 PM Permalink
While I do not know what religion she is, this question may refer to a hoax that has been around which claims that she converted to Islam because of things that she saw while on the moon. The claim refers to her as the 'first Indian woman on the moon'. This is completely false. Not only is she not the first Indian woman on the moon, there have been no women at all on the moon as yet. She did live on the ISS for a time, but definitely did not go to the moon! The gross factual errors alone show the credibility of the claim. Similar claims exist about other celebrities.
RE:Sunita Williams converted to Islam
by Dnyaneshwar patil on Sep 15, 2007 03:24 PM Permalink
Hey u Donkey why don't u come with good debate points instead of repeating the same nonsense
