Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 2226 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 51 | 52 | 53   Older >
National security at risk if canal is not built
by Anurag Shrivastava on Sep 14, 2007 01:24 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

In case of a war - ships will take 24 hours more to move from Vizag. In fact - the dredging should be deep enough to allow INS Virat to go through.

Once again - the religious guys have played into the hands of enemy. Last time it was at Kargil and Kandahar.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by Vikram on Sep 14, 2007 01:27 PM  Permalink

Watch the debates going on in TV channels (including the anti-Hindu NDTV) and newspapers.

Environmentalists as well as our military experts repeatedly opposed the Sethusamudram project.

Wake up and go get some sense!!!



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by Anurag Shrivastava on Sep 14, 2007 01:38 PM  Permalink
Which military expert has opposed this ? And lets not talk about rent-an-environmentalist characters like Bittu Sehgal , Vandana Shiva and neo-cons like the turncoat Subramanian Swami. The same environmentalists were enemies of Gujarat when they opposed the Sardar Sarovar Dam

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by Saths on Sep 14, 2007 01:28 PM  Permalink
Anurag,

Yes the canal should be built and no one is arguing with that here. How can a government ruling a country with 85% hindu's question the existence of god rama. You look to either not understand what people are discussing here or you are a muslim with hindu name. Come out with your real identity.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by Rajeev Sen on Sep 14, 2007 01:34 PM  Permalink
I am just expressing GOI views & desire, as evindent from Affedevid , not my own views .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by Anurag Shrivastava on Sep 14, 2007 01:36 PM  Permalink
Oh' - only people like you will act against National security. We are Indians here first - not Hindus, not Muslims , not Christians - these are secondary identities.

I hold no brief for the government because of the tactlessness with which this issue was handled. They have given BJP and unemployed characters one more issue to come to streets.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by Sahadevan KK on Sep 14, 2007 01:47 PM  Permalink
Congress and BJP leaders have the same policy, betray their cadres and supporters for George Bush.

Crores of arms deal; alliance to attack on Iran; CPI(M) opposes it. Now Congress partymen speaks as RSS cadre that the Left is anti-national.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by Venkat K on Sep 14, 2007 01:30 PM  Permalink
MAY BE WITH DAT MONEY THEY CAN BUY ONE MORE VIRAT

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by rashmi sahu on Sep 14, 2007 01:39 PM  Permalink
In future india has to face tremendous water problem, if they were so interseted they should have acted on river linking projects all over india.They never developed north east where our Army has to face tremendous problems in defending our borders.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by Rajeev Sen on Sep 14, 2007 01:26 PM  Permalink
To save even more time, we should build a canal from Gujarat to Bengal....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by vivekanand chourey on Sep 14, 2007 01:45 PM  Permalink
will anurag go for shramdan

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:National security at risk if canal is not built
by Vikram on Sep 14, 2007 01:27 PM  Permalink

Perfect!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:TIME NEEDED FOR A SECULAR CORRECTION
by Shanker M on Sep 14, 2007 01:52 PM  Permalink
Excellent "Mr indianpatriot" I liked your idea "Sep 14, 2007 01:24 PM" It is Fantastic!! Hope it will come to existence.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:TIME NEEDED FOR A SECULAR CORRECTION
by sayali padhye on Sep 14, 2007 02:23 PM  Permalink
r u congress secularist?for avaerage indian thats is an "gaali" ppl like u vote for congress and keep ur foreheads on foriegner's feet.u shoulld b ashames pinky,but then since u r congress woman u dont know what shame is

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:TIME NEEDED FOR A SECULAR CORRECTION
by pinky Arora on Sep 14, 2007 01:27 PM  Permalink
r u praveen togadia ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:TIME NEEDED FOR A SECULAR CORRECTION
by Nikhil on Sep 14, 2007 01:34 PM  Permalink
pinky Arora are you keep of a Muslim?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:TIME NEEDED FOR A SECULAR CORRECTION
by vivekanand chourey on Sep 14, 2007 01:52 PM  Permalink
ARE YOU A HALF MULLA

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:TIME NEEDED FOR A SECULAR CORRECTION
by saurabh vats on Sep 14, 2007 03:02 PM  Permalink
yeah I think Pinky is a M.ll of Muslims
hahahahahaha

Hindu bhi bure nahi hote aa jaao idhar

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rahul Gandhi rape case
by Nikhil on Sep 14, 2007 01:23 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Rahul Gandhi rape case is burried by Sonia

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Rahul Gandhi rape case
by Pisasu on Sep 14, 2007 01:45 PM  Permalink
I take serious objection to your remark.

Please do not call her names like this.



She may be a rogue or an agent of Vatican.

she may be an illiterate donkey or corruption personified.

She may be a stooge of CIA.

She may be a witch under congress shadow



To call her names like you have done is wrong.









   Forward   |   Report abuse
Poor Lord Ram
by sj on Sep 14, 2007 01:23 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Lord Ram has got into yet another controversy, thanks to our double-speaking politicians.We may not be as religious as our Christian or Muslim brethrens, but let us have some consideration for the majority of the Hindus and theirs feelings and faith.Ramayana is a great Epic of our land and let us not politicise it.Pls leave out the Gods from your dirty politics, you politicians.Just one last word to Congress party---Shame on you Congress

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Poor Lord Ram
by Sahadevan KK on Sep 14, 2007 01:47 PM  Permalink
Congress and BJP leaders have the same policy, betray their cadres and supporters for George Bush.

Crores of arms deal; alliance to attack on Iran; CPI(M) opposes it. Now Congress partymen speaks as RSS cadre that the Left is anti-national. Read: www.geocities.com/kksahadevan/



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Raze all hindu temple in this country
by Rajeev Sen on Sep 14, 2007 01:22 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Now that GOI has declared that there is no basis for existance of Ram and for that matter, sethusamundram, it clearly follows that there is no existance of Hindu Gods. So it will be logical to raze all the Hindu temples in this country. ........
Similary as scinece does not recognise existance of God as per GOI, so Hindu religion be declared baseless..........

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RE:Raze all hindu temple in this country
by Vikram on Sep 14, 2007 01:28 PM  Permalink
But, Congress party President already admitted that she does not have any shame at all and her party too never had any shame.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Raze all hindu temple in this country
by Shanker M on Sep 14, 2007 01:43 PM  Permalink
That is quite obvious that she is a shameless b**ch. Otherwise why would she have left her home country and come to rule another country?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Raze all hindu temple in this country
by sayali padhye on Sep 14, 2007 02:25 PM  Permalink
bravo

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Raze all hindu temple in this country
by Nitin Tripathi on Sep 14, 2007 01:35 PM  Permalink
As per your comment Hindu temples should be razed as there is no God.

Now tell me what is the proof of existence of any God?

Demolish all churches as there is no scientific proof that a virgin lady can conceive and give birth nor there is any proof that a man can come to life three days after his death, and hence, Jesus is as fake as Ram.

Demolish all Mosques as there is no proof of existence of any Allah or Prophet. If Ramayana can not be considered as a historical proof Quran can also be not considered as a proof for existence of Allah or Prophet.

It is not a question of existence of Ram or Allah. It is a question of faith. Can any body think of demolishing Mecca or Medina for sake of comfort and money? Can anybody think of demolishing Vatican? No, they can not. When it is a question of faith of 80 million people, then these things should be preserved.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Raze all hindu temple in this country
by Rajeev Sen on Sep 14, 2007 01:39 PM  Permalink
Dear Nitin , we are just talking about what GOI wants about india & its hindus. This is related with HIndus only. They can not domolish other places of god, as they have no proof against them....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RAM SETU
by tarun gandher on Sep 14, 2007 01:22 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

GOVT HAS LEFT WITH NO OTHER OPTION, NOW THE PERSON WHO HAS PREPARED THAT AFIDEVIT, PERSON WHO HAS PASSED AND SIGED IT, AND THE PERSON WHO HAS SUBMITTED IT SHOULD BE SACKED. WHAT SOLICITOR GENERAL, WHO HAS SUBMITTED THAT TO SC, WAS DOING? HAS HE NOT GONE THROUGH THE CONTENTS OF AFIDEVIT? IF ANY GIVE HIM HIS RESIGNATION, DOES HE WILL SUBMIT IT TO THE SC? WHAT OUR LAW MINISTER AND HIS ENTIRE WORK FORCE WAS DOING? NO NEED TO FIX ANY RESPONSIBILITY. EVERY ONE SHOULD BE SACKED WITH IMMIDIATE EFFECT.FEELINGS OF CRORES OF HINDUS ARE CHALLANGED. IF GOVT WOULD HAVE SAID A SINGLE WORD FOR MUSLIMS OR BUDDHA THEN PERHAPS RIOTS WOULD HAVE STARTED IN INDIA BY NOW. OUR LAW MINISTER HIS HINDU, DOES HE CELEBRATE VIJYA DASHMI AND DIPAWALI? HE SHOULD STOP CELEBRATING THESE FESTIVALS AND SHOULD RESIGN AS A HINDU AND SHOULD ADOPT ANY OTHER RELIGION, OR HE MUST GO TO SONIA GANDHI TO CONSULT THAT WHICH RELIGION HE SHOULD ADOPT.

SHAME ON GOVT OF INDIA.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RAM SETU
by Sahadevan KK on Sep 14, 2007 01:48 PM  Permalink
Congress and BJP leaders have the same policy, betray their cadres and supporters for George Bush.



Crores of arms deal; alliance to attack on Iran; CPI(M) opposes it. Now Congress partymen speaks as RSS cadre that the Left is anti-national. Read: www.geocities.com/kksahadevan/





   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM SETU
by vivekanand chourey on Sep 14, 2007 01:28 PM  Permalink
you r right,these stupid fellows should not be allowed to enter any temple.all hindus should bycott them,and they should not b allowed to celebrate any of our hidu festivals.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Systematic plan to eliminate Hinduism
by Vikram on Sep 14, 2007 01:21 PM  Permalink 



There is no doubt there is a systematic plan to eliminate Hinduism or at least reduce Hindus to a minority, by encouraging Muslims and Christians and discouraging Hindus.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Arjun Singh licks Sonia's hole
by Kanak Mal on Sep 14, 2007 01:28 PM  Permalink
Regarding the SetuSamudram Project ,

what is the name of the project ? Normally we call a project wile building something. But here we are breaking a Setu. The project should be named immediately as Setu-Breaking Project.

-Rupak

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Sonia is a pros...
by Pisasu on Sep 14, 2007 01:20 PM  Permalink
Spelling mistake ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Sonia is a pros...
by Pisasu on Sep 14, 2007 01:43 PM  Permalink
I take serious objection to your remark.

Please do not call her names like this.



She may be a rogue or an agent of Vatican.

she may be an illiterate donkey or corruption personified.

She may be a stooge of CIA.

She may be a witch under congress shadow



To call her names like you have done is wrong.









   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Sonia is a pros...
by Nikhil on Sep 14, 2007 01:21 PM  Permalink
Vikram, for Allah and Jesus sake please do not degrade the Pros*tutes in world.

They do a business and earn meal for themselves and their kids.

SOnia is such a smuggler who is stealing all money plus having fun for free

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Sonia is a pros...
by Vikram on Sep 14, 2007 01:23 PM  Permalink


I am sorry. I take back my words.



So, Sonia is worse than a pros...tute.



Sonia is sonia (I can't find any word worse than a pros....tute).





   Forward   |   Report abuse
vote for bjp in next ls election
by mahendra on Sep 14, 2007 01:18 PM  Permalink 

if u r rally feeling ashamed to b an indian following this episode then never vote congrss.i rquest up people not to vote mayavati or mulayam.because by voting them congress will get power again.they all will sleep with congress for power

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 2226 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 51 | 52 | 53   Older >
Write a message