Finally mainly known a secular India congress lead UPA Govt has agreed for their committing mistake over sethu project & started to define secularism after putting their view in Supreme Court that there is no existence of Ram. It seems they really drop in country to be communalized how Mr. Rajiv Gandhi laid the inauguration stone of Ram temple at Ayodhya being a secular leader. To-day his wife Mrs Sonia, Chairperson of UPA led the issue about the existence of Rama being a secular..How it looks? it could be easily understandable the perfect meaning of secular by UPA. Our constitution have contained a picture of Rama which has shown how Ravana(cruel)is punished by Ram.Mr. Mahatma Gandhi used to say always Ram%u2026 Here the matter of not a existence, it has shown the view & approach of the UPA govt..
My question is:-Is after killing /abusing a religion you could seek for sorry? Is it acceptable? My parents & I have full faith in congress & I belong from freedom fighter family too. I socked from UPA Govt attitude which drop the secularism by abusing a religion & how nicely Govt is defying secularism.. where am I?
RE:Ramsethu
by Anurag Shrivastava on Sep 14, 2007 05:30 PM Permalink
don't worry Arun. Have faith in Congress and do not give up on secularism. Congress has not questioned your religion. While people can have faith in their God and their is nothing wrong with that, the government will act only on evidence and science else we will get dragged by 1000 years backward by not very intelligent masses. ASI had no business to call Ram a myth and should have kept quite even if that is what they believe. A good Hindu can be an athiest as well. It does not make him a supporter of Taliban or leftists.
RE:Ramsethu
by ANAND TEERTHA on Sep 14, 2007 05:28 PM Permalink
Mr.Arunji OLD CONGRESS is dead when Indira split Congress!.The present day fake Gandhis lead Cong-I was born during year 1967.It is better if you come out of the congress coocon and see how Cong-I destroyed the very social fabric of india.Vote them out from india.
RE:RE:Ramsethu
by Anurag Shrivastava on Sep 14, 2007 05:32 PM Permalink
Congress can make BJP dance to its tunes anytime it wishes. If there are real serious issues facing the government - bring up issues like Ram Sethu and BJP jokers will start dancing like monkeys. Say sorry and they will go back to cubby holes confused.
Both Ram and Ramayan are part of our majority Hindus faith. Both have advocated good morals which any country should be proud to inherit and implement instead of conducting a debate whether it is true or not. In this world so many things exist and wonders take place without any logic. To follow good things which are globally relevant today, one need not debate and waste our energies.
RE:RE:Part time Online Jobs. Earn Rs.50000
by Sanjay S on Sep 14, 2007 05:29 PM Permalink
I can do part time job with you only Shruti!!!!If u want mail me on snnjay@rediffmail.com
If archaeology cannot prove whether a temple existed at Ayodhya or a mosque just 500 years ago, what help can it render in establishing historical events more than 7,000 years ago? Go read the book by Pushkar Bhatanagar, author of Dating The Era Of Lord Ram. "If the people of those times failed to construct buildings which could survive seven millennia (7000 years), an inference should not be drawn that the country had no inhabitants at that time or that Ram is a myth. And will such evidence ever be found, considering that the cities of that time have been built several times over?
As far as Proof of Ram and Ramayan is concerned ITS IS TRUE.
RE:PROOF and Nothing Else%u2026!!!!
by Q H on Sep 14, 2007 05:24 PM Permalink
aaj hindus ki yeh haalat ho gai he ki unko pushkar bhatnagar ko dhoondna par raha he just to prove their religious belief
sonia ji has been a lot kind to oblige and order her chamchas to withdraw the BAKWAS submitted in the Apex court... now i request to apex court to ask the culprits about the basis of filing the affidavit and then withdrawing it...at some point of time they have committed sum mistake n those who r responsible should be punished...
