Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1799 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
And see the whole audacity: Even Ram's existance has become vote-centric.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 09:21 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies


And see the whole audacity of psuedos: Even Ram's existance has become vote-centric.

As if, if Congress continues to get vote even after this, they are free to abuse Hindu belief.

This is neither democracy, no secularism.

This is bigoted, facist, anti-Hindu rule.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:And see the whole audacity: Even Ram's existance has become vote-centric.
by Sahadevan KK on Sep 14, 2007 01:22 PM  Permalink
Congress and BJP leaders have the same policy, betray their cadres and supporters for George Bush.

Crores of arms deal; alliance to attack on Iran; CPI(M) opposes it. Now Congress partymen speaks as RSS cadre that the Left is anti-national.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Long Live
by RRRChola on Sep 13, 2007 09:17 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Long live Sonia Gandhi, Long live Manmohan Singh, Lomg live Montek Aluwahlia.

These are the architects of the surging India, the economic power India, is today.

If we had depended on the so called other leaders, who created so much of mess, by now we would have borrowing rice from bangladesh, nepal,myanmar, wheat from pakistan, machinery from bhutan,oil from madagascar, toothpaste from china.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Long Live
by R Chakravarti on Sep 13, 2007 09:19 PM  Permalink
What is Sonia Gandhi's contribution?
And Ahluwalia's?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
''Hey Ram'' of Gandhi has failed to protect Lord Rama. Now ''Jai Sri Ram'' is required to protect it.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 09:15 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies


"Hey Ram" of Gandhi has failed to protect Lord Rama. Now "Jai Sri Ram" of VHP is required to protect it.

Its proved again, that Gandhian Policy is dead. People need to protect their God, culture aggressively before these Xtian-Islamic-Marxist onslaught.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:''Hey Ram'' of Gandhi has failed to protect Lord Rama. Now ''Jai Sri Ram'' is required to protect it.
by R Chakravarti on Sep 13, 2007 09:26 PM  Permalink
The Ramayana is certainly a guide for all Hindus, written by a divinely inspired
person. The affidavit doesn't contradict this but they should have been careful.
I do think that the Ramar Setu should be protected and the channel should not be
dug out. The place should be preserved.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
What a Law Minister..
by Ratnesh Sahay on Sep 13, 2007 09:14 PM  Permalink 

Here we have this law minister, his credentials are so great that only a person of his kind will get a berth in the congress govts. First he cleared Quattrochi's bank account as if he was in more hurry than Quattrochi himself.



And now he has given this affidavit. And there is another drama that Sonia is very upset about it. Whom is he trying to please, Sonia or the public. No wonder if these are called headless chicken. People like Bhardwaj will be ready to sell this country for their own self interest.

For thousands of years people in India have worshipped Lord Ram, because they were foolish. What about your parents Mr.Bhardwaj. Do they celebrate Diwali.....must be because they are also foolish and so produced you.

Now what kind of proof do you want about Lord Ram...he shall come personally to tell you about himself and to your great solicitor ( at least he told you that dear Sonia is not happy ). You are an extreme case...how can you be a minister ?

An affidavit is an oath, supposed to be true in all terms. What compels you to withdraw it, because Sonia is not happy about it, do you remain happy about it ? If you are, then stay with your affidavit as a minister. Because you are the minister and you are serving the nation, not Sonia.

When you apply to be a minister in the next terms, do not forget to mention on your cv about your monster attitudes and acts, it will only enhance the chances.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 1799 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message