Is there any incontroversial proof in existence of Jesus, Prophet Mohammad, Koran and bible being revealed?Ramayana is a travelogue indeed. As per Ramayana the places that are discussed during exile of Rama and his younger brother do exist in different part of country in the course of their travel like through MP and south.I have seen many places myself and they correlate highly with descriptions in Ramayana, one example is Ramtek near Nagpur in Vidarbha.
The affidavit by Archaeological survey is audacious ,idiotic and unwarranted. They should take it back or UPA government particularly led by a christian lady without any teeth and ethics and morality will seriously face music, congress in particular. There is limit to everything.Supreme court should also not meddle into religious matters and beliefs .We would like ASI and Supreme Court judges to produce the evidence that Rama was NOT existing. Idiots in the government institutions should understand that it is technology now,that through satellite NASA tracked the drowned bridge like structure. It can't be seen so clearly otherwise. Science thus knows very little and affidavit of government is pure audacity and irresponsible act and against Hindu sentiments and beliefs and outright condemnation of holy book Ramayana. The fraudulent experts in ASI should keep quite and read US and western books to earn 'farzi research degrees".Government failed to act sincerely to tackle various issue recently. Congress must now WIND UP.
RE:RE:This is just too much
by AD on Sep 13, 2007 12:33 AM Permalink
Most of the laws in U.S are based on Old testament(Torah) and New testament(Bible).
Since Christianity is the largest faith so the law never hurt Xian feelings
Still a world's best developed country.
Indian Government should try some other ways if it hurt religious feelings.
RE:And see DMK's shameless politics: End of the day, they were partner of ''Hindu'' BJP at the center for 5 long.................ggg years at Delhi.
by cycube on Sep 13, 2007 12:19 AM Permalink
now finally, you are spot on who is reponsible....muslims, christians, buddhists, sikhs are not in the least concerned about the canal.
RE:And see DMK's shameless politics: End of the day, they were partner of ''Hindu'' BJP at the center for 5 long.................ggg years at Delhi.
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 12:20 AM Permalink
2002 February, Atheist DMK remained silent during Gujarat Incidents.
They showed their true character then. A million Dinesh Kumars cannot refute this, what they can do is to ignore and spread falsehoods of the non existent greatness of a yellow towel leader
we prayed to false Gods. All gods from hindu religion are false and imaginary. People are stoopid that they don't think idol or animal cannot be god. if you build any kind of idol and start prying to it then hordes of people run after you.
RE:Ram and Ramayan is fiction
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 12:19 AM Permalink
You are only spreading Falsehood. God is Real and existence of God is a fact. Hinduism is one of many ways God has used to spread the message of God's existence. The frog in well shuts its eyes and that doesnt mean that world is dark
RE:Ram and Ramayan is fiction
by Vineet Arora on Sep 13, 2007 12:20 AM Permalink
One doesnt give us a right to talk about one's religion like this. I don't know your religion but there are a lot of bad things that you can read about Prophet Mohammed, Jesus Christ, Judas among others. Do you want to talk about them?
RE:RE:Ram and Ramayan is fiction
by ram on Sep 13, 2007 12:25 AM Permalink
you dirty fello if u have any face are born to human come out with u name and address dont hide and spred false with help of this channel u all useless fellows
RE:Ram and Ramayan is fiction
by NASIM ZAMAN on Sep 13, 2007 12:35 AM Permalink
Dear Billu Go to a shrink before it is too late. And please do something for Rama setu before it is too late. It is going to be destroyed when you read Bukhari Shareef and Abu Dawood.
This is real bad that the govt. is not taking care of hindu sentiments. Would the govt. say the same if it were a muslim or christian holy place or a dargah?No.. it wouldnt say. as it is always looking for its votes. In hyderabad, the dargah is not demolished even though it is in the middle of the road construction. can the govt. go ahead and demolish it and say that there is no historical record whether the sufi saint was present or not. it wont do that. Thats real bad govt. dividing the people on basis of religion.
RE:what is happening?
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 12:18 AM Permalink
Just like DMK did that in 1967 elections.. they used one random statement from Congress Minister (he said inverdantly that women should not buy gold and buy rice).... they used Kallakurichi and Hindi agitation incident to convert to votes and now converting same to notes.
RE:I don't mind if you say, I DONOT BELIEVE RAMA DID NOT EXIST.
by dinesh kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:19 AM Permalink
nobody has ever said that rama does not exist.
the govt has stated that it has no evidence,and in the absence of evidence that it is a myth.
why will anyone take this issue to a court when there is no evidence.
what is the intention,other than vote mongering.
and making u develop insecurity and inferiority when u have no reason to develop those feelings.
If there is no proof of existence of lord rama, equally there is no proof for lord rama's non exstence
so better the guy who gave the affidavit go to neurologist and avoid cheap publicity and better govt think of development without affecting public at large due to whom they are living
RE:hmmmmmm
by NASIM ZAMAN on Sep 13, 2007 12:21 AM Permalink
It is a matter of simple logic that non-existence does not need proof. You did not exist before your conception. Can anybody provide any proof that you existed even before you came into existence with a tiny living cell into your mother's womb. None of us existed before our conception. So non-existence does need proof.
RE:RE:hmmmmmm
by NASIM ZAMAN on Sep 13, 2007 12:55 AM Permalink
Have you read "A brief history of time" by Stephen Hawking? According to him the Universe did not exist before it was created after the big bang. Even Gita says so. Now don't ask me who is Gita?
RE:RE:hmmmmmm
by harish bysani on Sep 13, 2007 12:24 AM Permalink
can u give proof of existence of ur forefathers and they were exactly your forefathers
As a Italian Christian she do not know the Power and Strength of India and Hindutva Party PM and she should be punished for this. If they have any dare they may come to Hindus we will show the power.An india born hindu can able do any thing with his power and with the help of god RAM JAI SRIRAM .what is the power of this mantra they will know in near future.
RE:Sonia Should be punished
by harish bysani on Sep 13, 2007 12:15 AM Permalink
ya our people can do anything like brining back congress to power knowing all this
and then regretting for the actions
this is how british took over us and dont know whn our guys understand
RE:Sonia Should be punished
by Vineet Arora on Sep 13, 2007 12:17 AM Permalink
If you think God is so powerful, why doesn't he come to his own rescue and prove everyone wrong or atleast show a sign that there was a bridge there in historic times? Buddy when we are talking about science and economy, it will be much better for our country to steer away from mythology. It is this dependence of ours on myth that is keeping us lagging behind those Western economies, who look at the blogs like yours to amuse themselves.
RE:Sonia Should be punished
by harish bysani on Sep 13, 2007 12:26 AM Permalink
Mr Vineet agreed with you and if people are so keen on development there are many developments in priority list and i dont understand what is the benefit u derive by having bridge to lanka when the same money can be used to better purposes
All those who question the existence of God whether it is Ram or krishna, they should be condemned in severe terms becuase they are playing with the faiths of millions. Sonia may not be practising Hindusim but she has no right to question the believe which has been running for centuries. This is the penalty we pay for making her to sit as Congress Party President even though she does not deserve to be a minimum party worker
