5.He was the only son of God(represented by an old dilapidated middle eastern man with grey beard)?
6.'Saint' Thomas came to India in AD 52?
7.That he converted brahmins in Kerala coast and built 7 churches?
Then why did the Central Govt issue a coin to show respect to the adventure of 'Saint' Thomas in India whose only mission would have been to decrese the number of Hindus?
RE:Historical proof
by Mathew Mathews on Sep 13, 2007 12:39 AM Permalink
Evidence of christ existance was recorded by the Romans, who inspite of their decadence was very particular of keeping documents and evidences. Chirst being the son of GOD is relevent only to people who beleive in him ( I do)the same for all questions from 1 to 5., others have the freedom of not beleiveing so. The pictures depicted as christ are not hsi images, but made by an Italian hundreds of years after christs crucification. St.Thomas may or may not have come.It doesnt really matter. Christiannity in what ever form was brought to India. Whom he converted ( some say Brhamins, I dont beleive in that)also doesnt matter, it is a relegion to those who beleive in GOD, no caste or creed. Issuing coins, I dont support, does it really convey anything? It doesnt. The goverment can concemtrate on temporal things, they should not meddle with religion.
RE:Muhammad Cartoons
by Pradeep Kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:28 AM Permalink
Hey Gutter Pig Billu, the way u speak dirt against other religion's im sure ur mom does not know who ur dad is
RE:Muhammad Cartoons
by Mahendra Parab on Sep 13, 2007 12:27 AM Permalink
If this bridge is not manmade, then its natural. Saving nature is our religion and I am Hindu.
RE:RE:Muhammad Cartoons
by Pradeep Kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:30 AM Permalink
Dude Vishal first go learn some english.. can make out ur some uneducated karsevak
RE:RE:Muhammad Cartoons
by Pradeep Kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:29 AM Permalink
Stop telling ppl to goto Pakistan or else where look what u and ur gutter pig family have done for the country except giving sh** like u birth and then ull know who should leave the country
It may be possible that right now we do not have evidence of Lord Ram. But, could somebody convince me why and how Valmiki and Tulsidas found out a country called Lanka, which is happened to be an island and next to India. How he predicted an bridge connecting main land India to Sri Lanka and how it happen to be so close to Rameshwarum which Hindus consider a place Lord Ram asked Lord Shiva's help. I am here mentioning very few things It could me an enormous list.
RE:Enforce the LAW - That is an OBLIGATION of the GOVT.
by anir on Sep 13, 2007 12:38 AM Permalink
Well, the laws, basically the secular laws, themselves are made to put all religions equally, which they are not!!!
So let's also do one thing...lets make the teaching of all religions exactly the same!!!
First, lets refrom islam...there are no concept like kafir, jihad in others.
RE:Enforce the LAW - That is an OBLIGATION of the GOVT.
by AD on Sep 13, 2007 12:53 AM Permalink
Islam says we cannot enforce religion on anyone. So why reform Islam.
The term kafir is for infidel(non-beleiver) present in Christainity and Judaism also.
The term jihad is strive for better life.You cannot kill an innocent.
Now you dont tell me why so many terrorist. If they kill innocents they will go to hell
as per Quran.
The America/British Constitution based on Old Testament(Judaism) and New Testament(Bilbile) .
Indian Constitution wrote by Ambedkar in 1947 is derived from this.
RE:Enforce the LAW - That is an OBLIGATION of the GOVT.
by ritunesh maurya on Sep 13, 2007 12:43 AM Permalink
Ya we can understand, you believe in demolishing such kind of things.
No Mr imran hindu are still first indian then anything else.
If we live in any country either india US or UK, We used to represent that country first. We better know the responsibility of being a faithful countryman.
Surely we never plant bumb or kill innocent people of the country, where we are living or where we have been brought up got education etc.
I think that i am not needed to say anything more than above.
You already got justification, i hope that you and other's are gonna understand the worth of my statement.
RE:DMK is a joker Party
by Pradeep Kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:36 AM Permalink
Billu does not know who is actual father is.. may be some ill educated and dirty minded karsewak who is mom to has not seen
RE:SONIA IS KILLING OUR RELIGION
by cycube on Sep 13, 2007 12:22 AM Permalink
make sure you appoint senile old people like mr. atthal vajjpayee & mr. abdhul kallam so that they dont chase after and bring back white foreign women to rule the republic of india.
RE:SONIA IS KILLING OUR RELIGION
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 12:25 AM Permalink
As they have appointed Musharaff a baffoon in Pakistan to protect their SHaria Govt.Which includes stoning women to death,bottle feeding terrorists,keeping Osmam in good health to train more terrorists
There is only one god, Sonia mata her prophets shivraj Patil and Pratibha Patil carry the message " destroy hindu culture,garner muslim vote and facilitate evangelism"
Is a shorter sear route really needed wounding the sentiments of millions of Hindus? WHat would that sea route bring to India except refugees,smuggled things,weapons,terrorists?
Would Sonia and Womanmohan Singh have touched even a mound associated with Xian or Sikh or Muslim faith?They would have hired histoy concocters to write new versions to save the mound.
RE:Sea route for what?
by rajeev nair on Sep 13, 2007 12:21 AM Permalink
Sea route for sex and spices ... Santa barbara is remade in Marathi... Santabhai and Baburao.. Howsat??
RE:Sea route for what?
by dinesh kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:22 AM Permalink
the sentiments of hindus have been wounded because of the person who took this matter to the court of law.
when u know that u dont have any evidence,why would u take it to a court of law.
the only intention is to wound the feelings of hindus and profit in elections.
