Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9300 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85   Older >   >>
Center will see proof of Ram soon
by Mahasabha on Sep 13, 2007 12:35 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Hiranyakashyapu also thought that and soon he got the proof.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Center will see proof of Ram soon
by suresh coomar on Sep 13, 2007 12:38 AM  Permalink
all hindus required KURBANI TO SAVE HINDUSIUM, IT WILL HAPPEND LIKE AKBAR AMD AURENGEJEB TIME..

HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF...

LIVE INDIA !!!! SAME SLOGAN WILL SEE SOON BY INDIAN PEOPLE.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:xians are going....
by cycube on Sep 13, 2007 12:39 AM  Permalink

According to the CIA dossier submitted to the US Congress, the Sonia Gandhee is just figurehead. The real power in the Republic of India lies in the lands of some elements known as Lallhoo, Pawwar, Arjoon and a few other miscellaneous riff-raff.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:xians are going....
by harish bysani on Sep 13, 2007 12:42 AM  Permalink
some thought to be given to statement why to curse one lady when we have our own idiots waiting for our fall for their benefit

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Thats it india under white rule again.... hindu and muslim want join again to fight
by prabha periyasamy on Sep 13, 2007 12:34 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Thats it india under white rule again.... hindu and muslim want join again to fight....
its right time to join brothers ... come on hindu brother calling save our pride

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Thats it india under white rule again.... hindu and muslim want join again to fight
by Krishna Arjun on Sep 13, 2007 12:38 AM  Permalink
Prabha ..HU R U ? under name of prabha ?

sachar report recommondations are getting implemented soon ..by which our muslim brothers will get direct reservations in army, police , govt offices ...at all places.

do you think that it will bring peace and harmony and matching hands together ?

india is under white and green Rule.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Thats it india under white rule again.... hindu and muslim want join again to fight
by prabha periyasamy on Sep 13, 2007 01:06 AM  Permalink
i am fine krishna but our country under white control .... smartly they took every thing ....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Thats it india under white rule again.... hindu and muslim want join again to fight
by cycube on Sep 13, 2007 12:35 AM  Permalink

Why blame the poor white woman brought back from Italy by the brown Indian Hindoo Rajeev...she is just a figurehead. Its well known that brown Indian men prefer white foreign women. eg. Nehroo fooled around with an Englishwoman, Rajeev with an Italian and now the little Rahool with a white Colombian woman. Brown Boooollywood actresses are desperately trying to be like white women. eg. Aiswwaryya, Shilppa

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Thats it india under white rule again.... hindu and muslim want join again to fight
by cycube on Sep 13, 2007 12:36 AM  Permalink

looks like the future PM is going to be a Colombian drug smugglers daughter.

since brown indian men cant control themsleves when they see white foreign women, the only way to curb the trend is to make a law that all political leaders must be senile & impotent (eg. mr. atthal vajjpayee) or castrated.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Thats it india under white rule again.... hindu and muslim want join again to fight
by cycube on Sep 13, 2007 12:38 AM  Permalink

errr....what happened to babree masjjid temple issue.....hindoo-mooslim problem solved ? he he...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Why do they take oath by name of God
by on Sep 13, 2007 12:32 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

So they say that Ram does not exist.
Then, why do all ministers and even prime minister have to take oath in the name of God before joining the office. Can they prove that God exist?

Why is it mandatory for witnesses take oath by the name of God in all the courts.

This remark from congrss led government shakes the basic framework of our society, needless to say it hurts the sentiments of millions of hindus worlwide. The statement is highly irresponsible and demands strong, united, and forceful opposition from all indians.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Why do they take oath by name of God
by Krishna Arjun on Sep 13, 2007 12:41 AM  Permalink


just wait and be ready to bear more shocks ...

sachar report recommondations are getting implemented soon ..by which our muslim brothers will get direct reservations in army, police , govt offices ...at all places.

do you think that it will bring peace and harmony and matching hands together ? is it called as democracy ? equality or vote bank politics ?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why do they take oath by name of God
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 12:36 AM  Permalink
You know these people will say "No God, No Rama, Hinduism is evil" in day time and night time they will visit astrologers and plan some black magic ritual to get a ministry post. That is politics and that is pioneered in South India , in TN.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why do they take oath by name of God
by manav gupta on Sep 13, 2007 12:36 AM  Permalink
hello they say that ram exists but the bridge that they are making is not the same as great lord ram made if you donot understand just to clerify the words of rediff

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Stupid of ASI
by Desi on Sep 13, 2007 12:32 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Do you believe that ASI has a technology,resource and skill to prove that this bridge never existed. They wont even have fund to excavate places like nalanda university where excavation is in progress for 40 yrs now and they have just digged a few buildings. How can they go to sea and confirm that bridge never existed.
These guys write papers after watching nation geographic and they want us to believe that shit.

We need another Rama and that has to come from within ourself to destroy so called secular forces..that are playing with Hindu sentiments

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Stupid of ASI
by manav gupta on Sep 13, 2007 12:38 AM  Permalink
they might not have technology to prove that the bridge never existed but just to add they had found the exsistance somewhere else near by and they are not harming that. and BJP knows that as it was found when they were in rule

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Stupid of ASI
by Krishna Arjun on Sep 13, 2007 12:43 AM  Permalink
JUST WAIT BROTHER ...

sachar report recommondations are getting implemented soon ..by which our muslim brothers will get direct reservations in army, police , govt offices ...at all places.

then real Green effect will have to bear by all.

JAI SRIRAM ...hey ram.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
who is this govt.
by deepak on Sep 13, 2007 12:32 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

who is this anti hindu govt. to decide whether Ram ji were there or not. No hindu needs to give proof to them.. we wil give them what they deserve.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:who is this govt.
by manav gupta on Sep 13, 2007 12:39 AM  Permalink
this goverment is saying their is no proof that their was ram according to ramayan and other archeological things they are not saying the great lord ram never existed

   Forward   |   Report abuse
There was no Mahatma Gandhi, No Nehru
by Ganapati Hegde on Sep 13, 2007 12:30 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

What if after 1000 years, people start questioning, that there was no Gandhi and no nehru ???.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:There was no Mahatma Gandhi, No Nehru
by dinesh kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:32 AM  Permalink
there is evidence for gandhi and nehru.

but no evidence for lord rama .

which is what the government has said in the court.

now,who brought about this situation by taking it to a court of law?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:There was no Mahatma Gandhi, No Nehru
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 12:35 AM  Permalink
Is there evidence of Kannagi? Why her statue in City? Is there evidence of Kumari Kandam and all? Is there evidence of Aryan immigration theory? Tell us that first...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:There was no Mahatma Gandhi, No Nehru
by manav gupta on Sep 13, 2007 12:41 AM  Permalink
you can put your statue no one will ever question

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:There was no Mahatma Gandhi, No Nehru
by manav gupta on Sep 13, 2007 12:41 AM  Permalink
the govt said their no evidence that lord ram existed at that place they never said that lord ram never existed

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:There was no Mahatma Gandhi, No Nehru
by Arun karthick on Sep 13, 2007 12:32 AM  Permalink
did gandhi build any bridge?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:There was no Mahatma Gandhi, No Nehru
by deepak on Sep 13, 2007 12:34 AM  Permalink
what after 1000 years man.. i have n't seen nehru and i don't belive he was there.. let anybody give his proof i don't care.. Who knows Sonia trapped Rajiv to take power in India!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:There was no Mahatma Gandhi, No Nehru
by Trendy on Sep 13, 2007 12:37 AM  Permalink
Ganapathi: First of all ask the questions to yourself. Do you exist ? Does your parents exists ? ...Answers is YES. But incase of RAMA...NO(so far ... its been ages)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:There was no Mahatma Gandhi, No Nehru
by Ganapati Hegde on Sep 13, 2007 12:47 AM  Permalink
Trendy,



I assume that you are not a Hindu, since your writing shows insensitivity.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Italy govt made this ... we indians cant do anything
by prabha periyasamy on Sep 13, 2007 12:30 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

italy govt made this ... we indians cant do anything

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Italy govt made this ... we indians cant do anything
by cycube on Sep 13, 2007 12:32 AM  Permalink


Why blame the poor white woman brought back from Italy by the brown Indian Rajeev ?



According to the CIA dossier submitted to the US Congress, Ms. Sonia Gandhee is just figurehead. The real power in the Republic of India lies in the lands of some elements known as Lallhoo, Pawwar, Arjoon and a few other miscellaneous riff-raff.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Italy govt made this ... we indians cant do anything
by prabha periyasamy on Sep 13, 2007 12:36 AM  Permalink
may be not everything brother

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Italy govt made this ... we indians cant do anything
by dinesh kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:35 AM  Permalink
who filed the case,when everyone knows that there is no evidence?

why would anyone want to take the matter to the court.

the juges are bound to question and the govt is bound to answer.

it is not a panchayat.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Italy govt made this ... we indians cant do anything
by prabha periyasamy on Sep 13, 2007 12:39 AM  Permalink
if they want remove ram name in histry .. they are ready to remove gandhi also frm histry ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
A OPEN QUESTION TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 12:29 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

If you dont believe in existence of Rama and God, why do you own Temples where people worship these gods?



WHy dont you stop owning Hindu Temples and Hand over to a collective of devotees and believers in Hindu Religion?



End this contradiction now.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:A OPEN QUESTION TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
by imran patel on Sep 13, 2007 12:31 AM  Permalink
Government has NO right to OWN a religious place. It is not the job/responsibility of the Government. Places of worship must be owned and maintained by trust/individuals. There should not be any TAX money involved.



Government should see off these properties or should demolish them.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:A OPEN QUESTION TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 12:33 AM  Permalink
Incase you dont know, Govts own most of temples in India. The politicians swindle the money and they then in public say that there is no god. This does nto happen with mosques and churches, because Muslims and Christians are far more careful and cautious in matters of God.



It is mistake of Hindus to trust the atheist , bloodsucking politicians. That is the real problem

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:A OPEN QUESTION TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
by imran patel on Sep 13, 2007 12:38 AM  Permalink
That is beacuse Hindus do complain about it.

Why should temples be owned by the Government and why should TAX payer money be used to run any place of worship.



We need to limit the role of government. Religion is a personal matter and so should the places of worship. They must be owned and maintained by a trust/individual.



Stop living in this seudo-Communist state. It is time we limit the role of government and respect the LAW of this nation.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:A OPEN QUESTION TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
by dinesh kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:38 AM  Permalink
the muslims and christians are minorities,for ur information,hindus are 80 % of the population of this country.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:A OPEN QUESTION TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
by dinesh kumar on Sep 13, 2007 12:37 AM  Permalink
who will select that collective of devotees and believers.

what if some of the believers also believe in theft.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:A OPEN QUESTION TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
by MGR Fan on Sep 13, 2007 12:41 AM  Permalink
That should be left to the believers. We dont want atheists to interfere in the affairs.



If muslims and Christians can manage their places of worship without any theft issues,H indus can do that. Certainly we dont need any interference from God Hating Nazis like your party men

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 9300 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85   Older >   >>
Write a message