Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9300 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60   Older >   >>
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
RE:What?
by David on Sep 13, 2007 03:11 AM  Permalink
pradeep,



can you question the faith of muslims ? Can you question if Jesus was a historical figure? Do you know that there is no proof till date that both Jesus and mohammed are what they are supposedly preached to be....Jesus was a carpenter who was hanged for talking against judaism. Muhammad was a common man who had nothing special about him except for raging over idols.... strange it is that your balls dont swell when you talk about other religions..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Psuedos are so nervous, the Hindu did NOT even mention that UPA filed an affidavid: THERE IS NO PROOF THAT RAM EXISTED.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 03:00 AM  Permalink 



Psuedos are so nervous, the Hindu did NOT even mention that UPA filed an affidavid: THERE IS NO PROOF THAT RAM EXISTED!



hehe..Now, UPA will face the music.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Arun -
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 13, 2007 03:00 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


I did not see your post... give me your post.

You are abusing my Lord, and Faith is that not enough abuse? ... If you dont believe keep quite,.. anyway Govt is with you in wiping out Hinduism from earth.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Arun -
by Arun karthick on Sep 13, 2007 03:01 AM  Permalink
kanna,

Indian will never hide behind a paki.
i am born for a single mum and father.more than that for my mother india.

until i die,i am india .for whatever reason it can be.
and will fight against anti-bodies like u as well.for my mother india.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Arun -
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 13, 2007 03:05 AM  Permalink



use blog instead Xs ...

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070508/asp/nation/story_7747873.asp

read this ... This is Govt Scientists report that caused furore in assembly ...which Karunanidhi is hushing up

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Arun -
by Arun karthick on Sep 13, 2007 03:09 AM  Permalink
%u201CSuddenly, some communal elements have banded together to give this controversy a religious hue, attempting to create a bloodbath here, just as they did by demolishing the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya to build a temple to Ram,%u201D Karunanidhi told the House. %u201CMost of these people opposing the project are north Indian religious fundamentalists.%u201D

this is the only fact.



   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:RE:Arun -
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 13, 2007 03:03 AM  Permalink

I said gimme your post. I gave you links ....

http://poduniversal.xxxxspot.com/2007/05/adams-bridge-also-known-as-ramar-bridge.html

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:Arun -
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 13, 2007 03:06 AM  Permalink

use blog instead Xs ...

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070508/asp/nation/story_7747873.asp

read this ... This is Govt Scientists report that caused furore in assembly ...which Karunanidhi is hushing up

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:Arun -
by Arun karthick on Sep 13, 2007 03:03 AM  Permalink
      is anyone supporting the proj is paki..?
And others are indians???

how is that possible.

the one against the project are traitors.As they are against the nations development.

one who supports it are none but true indian lovers.who wants india to be a super power.

so all opposing guys,dont confuse it and make some funny comments on nationality.

u guys are discarded as traitors first.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Arun -
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 03:00 AM  Permalink

Don't reply to him. He is a sick Jehadi, missionary bigot.

COnserve your energy.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Arun -
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 13, 2007 03:02 AM  Permalink

It's ok ... I can answer even them. I've my dear Lord in my heart.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Arun -
by Arun karthick on Sep 13, 2007 03:02 AM  Permalink
conserve it.and go to road and strike..



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
RE:tsunami shud come and wipe out all the tamils, remaining few sri lanka will wipe out. lol.
by Dd on Sep 13, 2007 03:03 AM  Permalink
please don't post comments which make you look as xtian or paki agent. remember greater part of hindu philosophy including Sri Shankaracharya came from south .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
RE:who is indian and pak in this forum...
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 02:58 AM  Permalink


You are a sick person. Never play with fire. You will get burnt at the end.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:who is indian and pak in this forum...
by Dd on Sep 13, 2007 03:00 AM  Permalink
how much $ you took from your neighborhood xtian preacher to convert .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ha ha ha
by Peace on Sep 13, 2007 02:55 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

this is the joke of millenium.....I cant stop laughing on this bunch of secular in india.



Thanks to awakening Hindu Kumbhkarnas..





    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Ha ha ha
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 02:56 AM  Permalink


I hope this too.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Ha ha ha
by Peace on Sep 13, 2007 02:59 AM  Permalink
I believe UPA is dong excellent work for Hindus. anybody agrees or not..... keep it up..

your bluffs.



There is no RAM, than Mahatma is false... excellent.





   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Ha ha ha
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 13, 2007 03:00 AM  Permalink


me too !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
Even the Tribune, respected North Indian daily has headlined: No proof Ram existed: Govt
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 02:53 AM  Permalink 



Even the Tribune, respected North Indian daily has headlined: "No proof Ram existed: Govt"



http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070913/main1.htm









    Forward  |  Report abuse
Disputing Ram Setu and Ram himself are two completely different things.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 02:51 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies



Disputing Ram Setu and Ram himself are two completely different things.



ASI falls under Dept of Culture whose minister Ambika Soni is a Xtian.



UPA has done terrible mis-calculation. Just watch what happens from tomorrow.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Disputing Ram Setu and Ram himself are two completely different things.
by Bhuddha on Sep 13, 2007 02:53 AM  Permalink
So you want a Hindu minister for Dept of Culture, so that he can crew Muslim and Christian culture?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Disputing Ram Setu and Ram himself are two completely different things.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 02:55 AM  Permalink


Did any BJP minister disputed authenticity of Jesus, or Muhamud?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Disputing Ram Setu and Ram himself are two completely different things.
by Pradeep Kumar on Sep 13, 2007 02:56 AM  Permalink
Abe Tagtha ur balls had dropped of is it when BJP ministers demoslished babri masjid... they did not think once before demolishoing babri but when time came to demolish ramu...all up in arms

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Disputing Ram Setu and Ram himself are two completely different things.
by Bhuddha on Sep 13, 2007 02:57 AM  Permalink
Why do you forget the sazish of re writing history books? And falsely show people of other religions in a bad shape



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Disputing Ram Setu and Ram himself are two completely different things.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 02:57 AM  Permalink


hey, what I have done that you remarked like this?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Disputing Ram Setu and Ram himself are two completely different things.
by Pradeep Kumar on Sep 13, 2007 02:59 AM  Permalink
Well u dragged religion thats what u did . giving fire to Hindu extremists here

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Disputing Ram Setu and Ram himself are two completely different things.
by David on Sep 13, 2007 03:18 AM  Permalink
mukherjee,



where do you live ?

Forward   |   Report abuse
the Italian govt. is questioning the very existence of Bharat
by Dd on Sep 13, 2007 02:51 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I am an atheist and my personal beliefs doesn't count while interpreting this audacious statement. As a person one can question any thing . But as govt. , questioning the existence of lord Rama is essentially questioning the very existence of Bharat.
It is nothing but a part of greater game plan .
This is nothing but to test the strength of Hindu resistance to set the stage for further attacks to weaken and destabilize our country. Saint Sonia knows it that a divided and destroyed India will be too easy to proselytize than United india so in that knowledge is this larger blueprint to destroy Hinduism . Remember the pope's effrontery when he spoke of his dream to convert Hindus in his speech and saint sonia is just working on it. If Hindus will not give a befitting reply to this attack then i am sure the days of India as a country is numbered. Advani wrongly calls it blasphemy , it is war against our nation .



    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:the Italian govt. is questioning the very existence of Bharat
by Peace on Sep 13, 2007 02:56 AM  Permalink
wow.. Saint Sonia..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:the Italian govt. is questioning the very existence of Bharat
by David on Sep 13, 2007 03:20 AM  Permalink
this war is 1000 years old my friend.Christians and islamists want to eat up the 2 billion hindus, buddhists and sikhs...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 9300 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60   Older >   >>
Write a message