We should not get into controversy over the Br, We all know at heart it was not there and BJP, VHP want to draw mileage out of it. As alternative routes exist why not go for it, why only Ram Set route. govt and ASI should show more flexibility. Confrontation needs to be provided. bjp minus Vajpay is showing narrow approach by opposing every thing good the govt wants to do be it Ram Setu or 123 Nuclear Treaty
RE:Ram Setu
by rangdebasanti on Sep 13, 2007 05:04 AM Permalink
My Tejinder Fckisingh, Are you a sardarji? if yes, then wait till 12 midnight and then goto sleep and don't participate into a debate which tampers one of the oldest culture in the world. If you are not a sardarji, then please don't behave like one.
RE:Ram Setu
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 05:01 AM Permalink
What goodness will we get by having a structure destroyed when many ecologists,environmentalists have warned the Govt,let alone the sentiments of Hindus? What will we get from a sea route.A few extra rupees? Is it a people's republic where people's (a Mjority) will has to be respected.UPA and DMK(a gang)are looking like dictators.
RE:check out the mohammad cartoon
by Abhishek Banerjee on Sep 13, 2007 04:57 AM Permalink
I am just pointing out the double standards this govt has... why did sonia gandhi write a letter protesting this cartoon?
RE:RE:check out the mohammad cartoon
by Abhishek Banerjee on Sep 13, 2007 04:59 AM Permalink
I am sorry... the link seems to work on my browser... well it does work... cheked again
RE:Hiii
by Milind on Sep 13, 2007 04:52 AM Permalink
Hey...it negates the contention that it is a man made bridge. It says the formation of limestone shoals cannot be more than 3500 years old !!!
RE:Hiii
by Hyderabadi on Sep 13, 2007 04:57 AM Permalink
Hmm.. okay wiki was just for informational and it is neutral theory. I will not quote from it and i have not read it completely actually. sorry for if any confusion. but i sincerly believe one should not hurt ones beliefs and sentiments irrespective of any issue not just this.
RE:Hiii
by Milind on Sep 13, 2007 05:00 AM Permalink
True no sentiments must be hurt !!! And none are being by making the project. It's just a inflammatory headline from rediff not supported by anyone else in the mainstream media......so we must see it for what it is !!!
RE:Hiii
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 04:53 AM Permalink
It is a matter of faith sir.If the Govt can bypass destroying it,shouldn't that be done when millions of us have faith.And what on earth are they going to present India with having a shorter sea route to Srilanka?Let them do something for a shorter route to Kailas if they can or a shorter one to USA.
RE:Hiii
by Hyderabadi on Sep 13, 2007 04:55 AM Permalink
yes i agree one should not question the beliefs and sentiments of ones religion. Govt should stop the project. They will be able to find another route to make the bridge without destroying this
RE:Hiii
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 05:03 AM Permalink
Just the way,they kept away from hurting the feelings of Muslim men during thr Shah Bano case.
RE:Hiii
by rangdebasanti on Sep 13, 2007 05:01 AM Permalink
Mr Hyderabadi, I have all thr respect for you as a truth seeking human being. However, alike every single creature on this earth, who can not prove, whose offspring is he or she, but can not tolerate any abuse on his or her parents' name, the hindus can not and not at all can take any abuse on their God's name. ASI is a real fools' paradise and my suggestion to you, my dearest Islamic brother, is to stay away from this.
RE:Hiii
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 11:07 AM Permalink
Rangdebasanti , I wounder the level of u guys.Do u think by hurting the majority Cong can win.Why the hell they will say this...This is a report from ASI and r hard scintific facts.I wonder most of u guys wanted to fool themself to leave in false hood..Just like u don't accept that Sanatan Dharam is the real religion for u .And God is shapeless according to Vedas.
RE:Hiii
by firefly on Sep 13, 2007 05:07 AM Permalink
two neanderthal monkey men named Neel and Angad who were expert thinkers decided to cut rocks in a particular volume so that they float on water. These huge rocks sustained the forces of waves and also helped the army cross the bridge easily.
Lanka in the epic and Lanka existing now couldnt be a coincidence right? at least be rational. NASA themselves had agreed that civilisation existed in SriLanka around 10000BC right?
Dont beleive in NASA too much. American government, Cocacola, Google are involved in a big scam of altering content on Wikipedia too. A hacker in the recent news had prooved it by his software.
NASA says"It says the formation of limestone shoals cannot be more than 3500 years old !!! "..right? Can they go back to the age 10000BC and proove it?
Can they proove GOD made humans and other beings? In the future they may say Aliens created us...will all religions take the crap then?
If something dont exist so whats the problem in it. If we dont have anything which proves all this thing, let it be. People still want to belive let them belive, its upto individual how they want to take it. There is no need to fight or protest or compel other to belive this. There are many other burning issues which require our contribution to make our country healthy and wealthy. Protest against corrouption, crime, dowery , bonded labour, child abuse. Help poors, educate illeterate people there are many more to do. Just come out of this communal things we are in 21st century thik wider.
RE:RE:Whats the problem
by Milind on Sep 13, 2007 05:02 AM Permalink
Why get personal? Nowhere it was banned. yes there were protests by splinter Christian groups...but it wasnt banned.
RE:Whats the problem
by Taklu Gandhi on Sep 13, 2007 06:05 AM Permalink
Gautam Mukherjee, what is the proof that the person whom you call your father is really your father. May be your mother slept with someone else and she told you that your father is the one whom you called 'father'.
So finally Center has conceived a suicide idea, thanks to the trouble from Chinese sympathizer communists..!!
Now that the Govt is incapable of handling Terrorist from bangaldesh and Pakistan, probably the idea is to make India an Islamic state..!! But how are they going to solve the issues like shias and sunnis...and what about all other Minority communities who will NOT have any respect whatsoever in a Islamic state..??
RE:Center's Suicide Attempt
by Postwala on Sep 13, 2007 05:02 AM Permalink
Some idiot does something and you call us Chinese sympathizers, ABCD get a life you screwed up Ahole. Why the hell should we sympathise with China? We are more pro nation than you guys are and secondly more rational than your screwed minds always talking about blood and killing.
RE:Center's Suicide Attempt
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 11:17 AM Permalink
Abay Gadhay ABCD,
Issay Muslim ya Xtians ko kaya fayda hoo raha hay.Ram sethu ho ya naho...Abay jitnay Govt main bethay hain 90 % Hindu hain...Aur Shayad ASI main 99% hongay...
Lekin yeh to koi Ullu ka paththa bhee Samanjh Sakta hay ke sach kaya hay aur jhoot kaya hay..
RE:Soon more Facts coming up.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111
by Singamaneni Raghu on Sep 13, 2007 04:47 AM Permalink
well said my friend i think there is no point we all need same country any more , any state can fight for freedom .
