Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9300 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50   Older >   >>
PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 06:16 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

ANY BODY CAN GIVE ME SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT ANY THING HAS COME INTO EXISTANCE WITHOUT GOD (RAMA)? I WILL GIVE U SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF THE WORLD'S EXISTANCE BECAUSE OF GOD (RAMA).

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Golden on Sep 13, 2007 06:33 AM  Permalink
chchchuuu chhchcuuu no body is interested in your proof. who cares a man whose wife was kidnapped and then he fought for her and then abandoned her too afterward, did you ever revolted against your rama for he abandoned your sitha matha by accusing her with some very sheer allegation. will you accept a non-hindu alleging her like that then how come you accepted your god alleging her. a god should be more than a man and he should not be unjust. leave your scientific proof aside, and tell me if your god rama was right then sitha was wrong or is it other way around. tell me clearly who was wrong. dont try to divert the issue by asking another question like most of the mindless people do when they dont have any proper answer.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by prakash sachdeva on Sep 13, 2007 06:51 AM  Permalink
Should we have enough scintific knowledge to prove all the ancient hindu culture. ASI and its left wing have limited knowledge and dont know that hindu culture is mostly untouched by science and know body is interested in that

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 06:43 AM  Permalink
Don't try to understand God and his activities. First Try to undersatnd your self. Then U will undersatnd God's pastimes. If I tell you the reason's behind the God's activities U will not understand. You keep on offending the Lord by bleming him. So know who u r? I will appreciate.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 07:03 AM  Permalink
Ricky dear,
I am Muslim & I say without disgust there is no proof I hv of existance of God but ...Its my assumption.I say I don't hv the capacity to know how he looks like but surely better than light pure from all impurity,weaknesses And creator sustainer & cherisher of all the universe ,Ultimate in all respect that qualify to be my GOD nothing less.Did u the movie of Childern of Lesser God ? So its ur decision whoes childern u want to be...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Vivek Malhotra on Sep 13, 2007 07:59 AM  Permalink
Golden,You are a Bloody convert.You were a Scum and that's why your grandparents converted.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Golden on Sep 13, 2007 06:37 AM  Permalink
i dont find any reason for this message being abusive. he has asked simple reason and asking proof from ramamyan itself, why it should be blocked, you are not able to digest the truth right?
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 06:27 AM | Hide message
Ricky ,
Boss wake up ...U r right! there r ample proof of God existance... Yes there is a God or super power but that never matches the character called Rama,he doesn't qualify to be called as God even if we consider Ramayan True.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 06:49 AM  Permalink
He begets Not!!!!!!!!? From where u r getting this? Why he begets not?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 06:53 AM  Permalink
Let ME CORRECT YOU
say He is Rama who is one and only,
Who is beyond any requirement.
he begets evething that exists, he is never begotten.
and there is nothing like him.....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 07:11 AM  Permalink
Ricky dear,I think u r person of little understanding .
When u say in Ramayan " he needs Monkeys to built the Bridge !U r contradicting urself in line two.
When u say "he has a father Dashrath & a Mother.U contradict ur line no. three.
And there are millions of people like RAM may be more handsome or beautiful.What about Arnold .......Abay Jagoo yaar!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Vivek Malhotra on Sep 13, 2007 08:01 AM  Permalink
Danial Fakih,
An unusual name, Not here not there.Definitley a Sixer...Chakke.Go and stop this bloody ranting of yours.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 09:26 AM  Permalink
Malhotra..Tumhari too mughloo nee itnee mari hay kay tumhara asli nasal kaya hay pata naheen.
Sixer say kay matlab hay..jaisay kee tum ..
Kaya religion mix honasay Chkka banja ta hay..Abay kon say school gay hay takhti chap..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Hari Puttar on Sep 13, 2007 07:22 AM  Permalink
the so called monkeys were your forefathers as they had intelligence just like yours.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 07:45 AM  Permalink
Thats what u believe...& thats what u show in ur intellegence.
I believe my father was Adam a man, Created by Almighty GOD.

Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 07:27 AM  Permalink
GOD (RAMA) IS ACCEPTING THEM AS THERE FATHER AND MOTHER BECAUSE OF THERE LOVE AND HIS COMPASSION TOWARDS THEM. JUST LIKE IF CHILD ASK HIS FATHER TO BECOME HORSE FOR HIM. THAT DOESNOT MEAN HE BECAME HORSE.
HE WILL BECOME FOR HIM OUT OF NATURAL LOVE. BECAUSE GOD (RAMA) LOVES YOU MOST.
THIS U NEED TO UNDERSTAND.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 06:27 AM  Permalink
Ricky ,
Boss wake up ...U r right! there r ample proof of God existance... Yes there is a God or super power but that never matches the character called Rama,he doesn't qualify to be called as God even if we consider Ramayan True.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 06:31 AM  Permalink
So according to your understanding. Who is God?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by Golden on Sep 13, 2007 06:35 AM  Permalink
say it is Allah who is one and only,
It is He who is beyond any requirement.
he begets not nor he is begotten.
and there is nothing like him.....
this is the God's definition. bring a single god in your belief who qualifies this test.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:RE:PLEASE TALK SCIENCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 06:46 AM  Permalink
He begets Not!!!!!!!!? From where u r getting this? Why he begets not?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
No evidence to prove existence of Ram, Centre to SC
by Maddali Sitaramanjaneyulu on Sep 13, 2007 06:14 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

To Question the authenticity of Ramayana is nothing but sheer madness. Extending this argument can this Government swear before the Supreme Court that there is evidence of Quran or Bible. It is just madness at the peak. No Government which redicules God is bound to perish.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:No evidence to prove existence of Ram, Centre to SC
by Baalu Radhakrishna on Sep 13, 2007 06:17 AM  Permalink
Mr Anjaneyulu

ide samayam manamanthaa kalisikattuga UPA nu vodinchaali!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:No evidence to prove existence of Ram, Centre to SC
by prakash on Sep 13, 2007 06:37 AM  Permalink
mundu mana rashtramlo congress ni vadilinchikovali, congreess , tdp kaka inoka party avasaram manaku...

congress,tdp lu hinduvullo kula rajakiyali chesthunnayi...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
It is Ram N am Satya Hai for the Congis!!!
by Ganapati Hegde on Sep 13, 2007 06:12 AM  Permalink 

The Congis are digging their grave and the BJP is going to bury them in the next elections.

The Congis can chant Ram Nam Satya hai for their party from now.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RAM HI RAM WARNA SAB HAI HARAM
by deepak kapoor on Sep 13, 2007 06:09 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

CONGRESSIYOUN TUM TO AB BUS GAYE USI SAMUDRA ME, JAISE MULAYAM GAYA THA AFTER ATTACKING THE KARSEWAKS.
JO SABSE BURI GALI HO SAKTI HAI WOH TUM AUR TUMHARI SONIA MATA KE LIYE HAI.
AB SONCHO KI SABSE BURI GALI KYA HO SAKTI HAI, YES THAT IS IT.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RAM HI RAM WARNA SAB HAI HARAM
by Baalu Radhakrishna on Sep 13, 2007 06:18 AM  Permalink
sachcha bhola bhai
e jhooti congress ko hatao

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM HI RAM WARNA SAB HAI HARAM
by Golden on Sep 13, 2007 06:41 AM  Permalink
tera dimag phir gaya hai bachche. mulayam uske baad bhi bahut raaj kiya aur aaj bhi UP mein mayawati and mulayam hi hain tera bjp to ghaas katne ke layak bhi naheen hai UP mein.
han masjid girane ke baad bjp aur budhdhe narsimha rao ka band zaroor baj gaya tha. bechara PM hokar gumnaami mein ji raha tha baad mein cong mein bhi usko jagah naheen mili this.
buri goli to beta advani aur us chhakke ki liye hai, jiske bare mein kalyaan singh nein kaha tha bhulakkad, ghumakkad aur piyakkad.
yaar ek baat bata, tu is piyakkad ko itna support karta kyon hai? abe sharaabi ko apna leader to ek gadha hi bana sakta hai.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RAM HI RAM WARNA SAB HAI HARAM
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 07:18 AM  Permalink
Well Said Golden,
I don't know why this guy is abusing their own people ...Govt is 95% Hindu,ASI 99% Hindu & on top of it what govt got to do with scitific facts .Yaar yeh log aapnay ko bewaquf sabit karnay main kyon lagay rehtay hain?...


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Koi Bole Ram Rama Koi Khuda
by Gajanan Mohite on Sep 13, 2007 06:03 AM  Permalink 

Did the govt forget this hymn when they blindly proposed this. They have hurt even this famous hymn.

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Guru Nanaks view on Lord Rama &hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wv

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Taking this to the masses in villages etc
by Mahesh on Sep 13, 2007 05:58 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Think of a way to direct this anger and outrage towards dislodging this government at the first opportunity.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Taking this to the masses in villages etc
by Golden on Sep 13, 2007 06:08 AM  Permalink
your anger cant uproot any thing. emotions dont give any logic to the truth and truth comes on the surface today or tomorrow. but it takes guts and only honest people can accept the truth. our emotions cant make something real which never existed out of our story books.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:RE:Taking this to the masses in villages etc
by Golden on Sep 13, 2007 06:43 AM  Permalink
what happend? truth is untolerable right? it yes it hurts but our pain doesnt change it. so here it goes again.
RE:Taking this to the masses in villages etc
by Golden on Sep 13, 2007 06:08 AM | Hide message
your anger cant uproot any thing. emotions dont give any logic to the truth and truth comes on the surface today or tomorrow. but it takes guts and only honest people can accept the truth. our emotions cant make something real which never existed out of our story books.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
''Secularism'' has never been so illogical, naked.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 05:58 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies



"Secularism" has never been so illogical, naked.



Psuedos have done greatest damage to socalled "Secularism" themselves.



It was inevitable, BUT NOW VERY EXISTANCE OF RAMA IS QUESTIONED BY UPA.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:''Secularism'' has never been so illogical, naked.
by americaisgreat on Sep 13, 2007 06:00 AM  Permalink
THE VERY EXISTANCE OF RAMA IS ALWAYS QUESTIONED.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:''Secularism'' has never been so illogical, naked.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 06:01 AM  Permalink


People ralize whether its because of religious reason and principled rational arguments.



People are not fool.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:''Secularism'' has never been so illogical, naked.
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 06:31 AM  Permalink
Mukharjee,Boss wake up ...U r right! there r ample proof of God existance... Yes there is a God or super power but that never matches the character called Rama,he doesn't qualify to be called as God even if we consider Ramayan True.

Surely, Ignorance is curse.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 05:56 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

IF THERE IS NO EXISTANCE OF RAMA. THEN HOW THIS WORLD CAME TO EXISTANCE. PLEASE ASK THEM SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF HOW WORLD IS CAME INTO EXISTANCE?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by americaisgreat on Sep 13, 2007 06:00 AM  Permalink
what does your stupid gita gita says?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 06:07 AM  Permalink
Not what the fishermen written bible or the hate literature koran says.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by Golden on Sep 13, 2007 06:04 AM  Permalink
yes this world came into existence but surely not from rama the character in ramayana .

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
RE:WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 06:11 AM  Permalink


Golden: I am pretty sure you are a Muslim. Now, if you don;t show respect to Hindu religious figures, do not expect same for your religious figures as well.



Ots a give and take.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by prakash on Sep 13, 2007 06:12 AM  Permalink
what is GOD "golden" just contempalte, the so called RAMA taught us , by fullfulling the duties a mother,father,brother,king withe righteousness, you can be one with the GOD, i do not care if he is incarnation of GOD, but he was great person, who become one with the GOD, he is the GOD

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 06:43 AM  Permalink
Prakash,Mukharjee,

There is no bigger curse than ignorance.Use Logic.We all know that no science can prove existance of GOD, whether its Allah or Bhagwan .If its an assumption than why not assume God to be ultimate like Allah.Ram was too weak to be a God . Either Ram was God or a Person?Boss wake up ...U r right! there r ample proof of God existance... Yes there is a God or super power but that never matches the character called Rama,he doesn't qualify to be called as God even if we consider Ramayan True.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 06:26 AM  Permalink
What Do You Abbout Yourself? Think who Your are? Then You will find the Origin. You may call it Rama, Allah or Jesus, it does't matter.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by prakash on Sep 13, 2007 06:10 AM  Permalink
@ameica is great



why do you what Sri Gita says? we all know the design formula LOL, the human existed along with dinosaurs, the hesus cult is worse then amohammedans..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:WORLD'S EXISTANCE IS PROOF OF RAM'S EXISTANCE
by rickylara on Sep 13, 2007 06:28 AM  Permalink
Don't tell me hypothesis. Give me scientific evidance. Otherwise accept either Gita, Bilble or Kuran based on you level of capacity of understanding of God.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
reward the Hindu bashers,please!
by Marco Polo on Sep 13, 2007 05:52 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Next thing we hear from Mathaji Sonia Indian Gandhi will be that Osama bin Laden be given the Gandhi Peace Price for not attacking anyone in the last 6 years!

Southern Baptists will be given Bharat Ratns for offering to help the 'hopeless darkeness" ie their term for Hinduism

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:reward the Hindu bashers,please!
by Mahesh on Sep 13, 2007 05:55 AM  Permalink
You can bet on it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Husain award in legal tangle
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Sep 13, 2007 05:50 AM  Permalink 





http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070913/asp/nation/story_8310763.asp

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 9300 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50   Older >   >>
Write a message