Congress has digraced the as well as very badly hurted the religious sentiments of the Hindus. This shows that the congress can even sell the country to enemies like pakistan.
The entire Congress is an evil family. Congress has divided India first on the basis of religion. Then they divided Pakistan. Now they are again dividing India on the basis of caste( dat Arjun singh is d proof ) and religion ( in every election ). Congress is the nonsecular party wearing a secular mask.
RE:RE:come for a debate we will prove - truth alone cherish
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 13, 2007 09:39 AM Permalink
its blogspot, just making sure rediff wont block
RE:RE:come for a debate we will prove - truth alone cherish
by Pritish Nagaraj on Sep 13, 2007 09:40 AM Permalink
its b10gspot ...rediff blocks this word
RE:come for a debate we will prove - truth alone cherish
by Jeffrey Mittal on Sep 13, 2007 09:46 AM Permalink
From what you just wrote, you have NO idea what constitutes a debate.
Yuo are showing your tyranny and all the propoganda in the world cannot change that. Just repeating the same line over and over again may make it true for you but does not work for the rest of us and so your statement about most..,most.., etc is just that, most full of...
Reaad what you wrote and then reply.
Following your posts, it is clear that this is what you are about.
RE:come for a debate we will prove - truth alone cherish
by on Sep 13, 2007 09:47 AM Permalink
I respect all religions and I respect Islam But Just Shut up, guys like you never miss a chance to create problems and start fighting that my religion is better than yours. When will you grow up and talk like a man than making childish statements.
I wonder how Sonia Gandhi is trying to question the very existence of Hinduism. This Congress Party has gone crazy, not only are they converting people to christianity but at the same time they are questioning the very existence of Hinduism. I think they have gone too far. They should face the removal from the centre.
RE:come for a debate we will prove - truth alone cherish
by Sankalp on Sep 13, 2007 09:59 AM Permalink
hello bee, who is allah,is he an arab? Then if he is the only god,then why didn't he create everyone as Arab? why so many culture,so many languages,why even hindus? everyone should have been living in desert and doing whatever u guys are doing.please forgive me and my religion if the question is didturbing to you
RE:Soon...
by Sunil Fernandez on Sep 13, 2007 09:38 AM Permalink
Please note that only Hindu religious places are at risk. (The Indian government will always respect minority religions.)
Just because you can't reach a solution does not mean that the solution does not exist!!!
There is no proof available today about our very own ancestors dating 400 years back, Does that mean they never existed???
I/We can't see God, does that mean GOD does not exist???
Is there nothing called as belief/faith in Indians??
Fools!!! This is like a planned killing of Ram.
It was very much possible to say that,
"We have failed to find enough info about existence of Ram but that does not disprove his very existence. But, he surely exist today in every ones heart.".
this is atrocious and reminds me when taliban in Afghanistan had blown up the buddha statutes. it is the same mindset that congress has in India. lets march to delhi!
The history which we study in India is written by Commies and you well never find a truth in it. Science cannot answer everything. I'll be taking Mr. Prime minister and his ministers who are born some 50-60 years ago and will ask them a question that who is their father? How they came to know that so and so is his/her father?
It is ASI's finding, not Government politicians, now any one can disprove because it is infront of court who ultimately decides which is just as per law. Sometimes it is very very difficult to digest these kind of news(facts as per ASI), especially when you and all your household beleive from birth. I recommend whoever has the proof should present infront of the court instead of these discussions in media. Can't in India anyone who can keep a lawyer who can defend or prove against ASI?
But remember just because we beleived, truth will not become false or false become truth. E.g., many centuries people beleieved earth is flat, or sun going around earth... did they change just because we believed. When the proof came beleiefs have to change accordingly otherwise we making ourselves liars and our children followers of the lie. Your belief determinse your destiny
Sometime back I read in Competetive Success(I ma sure you can refer to may other hostorical books), a magazine that many Group 1 exam takers prepare had secion on persons Past, mentioned Jesus 4B.C Budha ~500BC Mohemmed ~500AD there they showed Valmiki ~800BC and Vedavyas ~800BC as Sanskrit poets, who wrote stories, why didn;t this agitation takes place then? You know more thing Valmiki is contemperor of Ram as per Ramayana... i.e Valmiki wrote part of Ramayana as they lived in same age. how is it possible one who lived 170000years back and one who lived in 800BC can be contemperors? Is History wrong?
RE:Truth is Truth, False is False whether we beleive it or not. Why don't someone prove to court?
by Rohini on Sep 13, 2007 09:28 AM Permalink
All said and done, the Centre's claims are in dispute as within the affidavit the ASI admits that till date it has not undertaken any study on Ram Setu to ascertain its historical or religious relevance. The affidavit, sworn by C Dorjee, Director (Monuments) of ASI said, "...there has been no occasion for the ASI or the Government to even make a prima facie determination that the said formation could be an 'ancient monument' entitled to protection under the Act and therefore, the ASI has not undertaken any study in this regard as yet."
RE:Truth is Truth, False is False whether we beleive it or not. Why don't someone prove to court?
by Rohini on Sep 13, 2007 09:38 AM Permalink
your magnize is wrong jesus should be at 0BC not 4 BC.Ramayan is not 1700000BC it is something around 7000 to 9000 old and so is valmiki.Anyway Indian historian specially written by maxist do not mention anything about kings before mauryas why?where they no king before them ?Do you know why mouryas are taken as starting of kindoms in india by these maxsists it is because Alexander the great historians wrote about him,hence chandragupt mourya exsistance could not be sidelined as they side lined all the early kings.Now if alexander had not invaded india then these historian would have started wirting history from muslim invasion,because at the end of the day our maxsist historian rely on invaders court accounts and not on our own itihas(the more dramatised version called puran).
The reason why Lord Rama and the Ramayana is so easily dismissed is because no one fears the Hindus. Hindus are seen as cowards because the majority of Hindus will do nothing if something is done against their religion. Most Indians claim to be Hindus but are not in fact Hindus, they go to temples, do their puja but never defend their faith and when other Hindus do stand up to defend Hinduism they are labelled fanatics.
Thus even in India, where the majority is supposed to be Hindu, people can easily stand up and insult Hinduism because they know they can get away with it. Had the Hindus had the same attitude and faith in their religion the way the Muslims have, then no one would dare insult their faith that easily, they would think twice, especially in India. But only in India, so many impotent Hindus live and allow for such insults to take place including MF Hussain's paintings depicting Hindu Gods and Goddesses as naked and having sex.
Shame on the Hindus for allowing such insults to go unavenged! Shame on them for not following the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita which cleary states what is to be done to those who attack your religion! Shame on India!!! Shame on Indians!!!
there's no proof of muhamed and family or jesus or his family, yet it is amazing to see the west and the europe spend millions and billions to continue in the name of human philosophy. even for a non-hindu- the philosophy- not ritual- of ramayan, bhagvad geeta and mahabharat are of enormous value in terms of higher awareness. it just seems that india no longer needs mughal and british invaders to destroy its heritage, culture, philosophy, anything. spineless "us" are enough to do that to us. by the way, why dont ppl march to delhi and protest this? or ask congress and ASI to prove muhamed and christ's existence! and if they cant give same treatment to their monuments too.
RE:india doesnt need invaders
by nitin JAIN on Sep 13, 2007 09:26 AM Permalink
I totally agree with u....the soft appraoch of Hindus is being taken advantage of here...do they want to have Osama's and Bush in our society too?
