Talk of Scientific evidences and asking for proofs will arise only for Hindu and Indic beliefs and a strict NO-NO for all crappy sentiments and beliefs of all non-Hindus. Respect the sentiments of all. That is real Secularism.
In that case every human being (be it Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi or even myself) has no historic evidence beyond one's parents or grand-parents.
I mean there is no historical evidence of my grand-father because he is no more and he had no land in his name nor was he like Gandhiji/Ambedkar/Nehru etc. whose statues/films etc are historical evidences.
So does it mean that I do not exist because now I cannot prove that my grandfather died 35 years ago and was alive till then?
Just for economical reasons Govt is playing with sentiments of Hindus. Whether govt comes up with a proof or not 'RAM' residing with crores of Indian's Heart.
Kick this congress idiots...how dare they can say this against hinduism ? Do they have the same guts to say thr was no allah and can they clear the rameshwaram issue ? Do they have guts to say that no jesus existed ?? Coward idiots ...they are fit to show these kind of foolishness only to hindus who keep of from violence... american scientist have accepted RAM existed and the bridge was built by him....how come you uneducated politician idiots can say this...
RE:Coward Idiots !!!!
by Mohammad Shamim on Sep 12, 2007 02:40 PM Permalink
RAM is nothing is but a character of story writer Tulsi, like other atory writers....same is proved here.........
RE:Coward Idiots !!!!
by vijay baskar on Sep 12, 2007 02:42 PM Permalink
Mohammad , We are not discussina about BOMB here ... its abt RAM..so u guys can search some other place to talk...
RE:Coward Idiots !!!!
by Ashok S on Sep 12, 2007 02:41 PM Permalink
Vijay, I doubt even if the congress people are humans. Even animals are shown in TV praying in front of Gods in temples.
For congressmen, money comes even before mother.
See things like bofors, Natwar Singh issue, St. Kitts issue, recent capture of terrorists living in ex-MLA's house in North-East etc.
RE:Indian govt has become bullshit
by Deepak on Sep 12, 2007 02:39 PM Permalink
dude .. the stmt is from ASI. Read carefully .. or ask someone to translate it for you.:)
While Ram may have actually existed, the other events related to his life may well have been created over the centuries to give him a godly status... he never was a god... just a mere human... read the Puranas and u will read that Ram himself acknowledges it that he is a mere human and a sinner...
Now think about this: when Hanuman was small he could swallow the sun.... So just imagine how big Haniman was if he could swallow the sun.. (The sun is 13,00,000 times bigger than the earth)... Such a huge person could have easily carried the entire army including Ram from the Indian coast to the Lankan coast... There was practically no need to build the bridge
Do u know anything about hinduism ? just naming u as a scholar wont help u goose... What the heck u know abt ram or hanuman... Now that u dont sugest what hanuman shud have done... Write a single page on ur worthless history not even ur dog will use it for......
RE:Ram Bridge
by Nightviper on Sep 12, 2007 02:42 PM Permalink
Religious scholar is perfectly right...Cant you dumb heads think with your mind instead of your heart???
RE:Ram Bridge
by Nandakumar R on Sep 12, 2007 03:05 PM Permalink
the question here is existence of Ram. U have accepted that Ram's existence thro puranas. That's all we want
RE:Ram Bridge
by Dr. Vinay Gupta on Sep 12, 2007 02:45 PM Permalink
Dear "scholar' One needs to have higher intellect to understand Puranas in their right meaning. When it is written that Hanuman swollowed Sun, then it is symbolic. When light of Sun doesn't reach to a large part of earth, we may say so. So, Hanuman must have jumped so near to Sun that due to his body shadow light could not reach earth. It is said in Puranas that these should not be read by all people, only a few are eligible to read those. The reason was this-people drawing wrong meaning from it.
In that case every human being (be it Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi or even myself) has no historic evidence beyond one's parents or grand-parents.
I mean there is no historical evidence of my grand-father because he is no more and he had no land in his name nor was he like Gandhiji/Ambedkar/Nehru etc. whose statues/films etc are historical evidences.
So does it mean that I do not exist because now I cannot prove that my grandfather died 35 years ago and was alive till then?
RE:RE:Is there historical evidence to prove who is Sonia Gandhi?
by Job KK on Sep 12, 2007 02:47 PM Permalink
Have you heard Sonia Gandhi said there is no historical evidence of existence of Ram. u r wrong.
Is our govt. is Govt. of Hindustan or Govt. of Islamic Pakistan. To say Ram was not existed , is like saying Lord Shiva is not existed, then why govt. arrange for Kedarnath, Kailash Yatra, Haj Yatra for Allah.? Why they fight for Ram Temple? Is Hidustani Govy. is " NASTIK "?
