Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9300 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30   Older >   >>
Why the Ram Setu must not be destroyed?
by SSCD on Sep 13, 2007 11:14 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Our Identity, Hindu Asmita and Historic Monument:
Like Ayodhya, Somnath, Amarnath, and 12 Jyortilingas, Ram Setu has a special place in our history, its integral to our identity as Hindus. Destruction of the Ram setu means a blow to our identity (Hindu Asmita). It's a rare testimony to our advances in engineering sciences in the past. It's a rocky structure sandwitched between layers of sand, conclusively proving that it's a man-made structure. All versions of Ramayana elaborately describe the Setu bandhan events. Sculptures in ancient temples have portrayed the Setu bandhan events in details.

Risk to Thorium Deposits and Strategic interests
Our political leadership is selling out critical national interests, they are literally letting people steal thorium rich sands (4% yield, highest ever found anywhere else in the world) and shipping it out. There are FIRs registered for such instances. So this is happenning!! They want to use the canal for cheaply transporting out 'the sand'. Our former president/scientist Prof. APJ Abdul Kalam has stressed on nuclear self-reliance and in particular, a plan based on our thorium reservoirs. And such plans go haywire if thorium deposits vanish like this. The SSCP may result in erosion of thorium-rich sand deposit along the south indian coast.

US Navy refuses to acknowledge India-Lanka historical waters between India and Srilanka. The SSCP is cleverly drawn along the median making way for an international line and hence international water

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Why the Ram Setu must not be destroyed?
by SSCD on Sep 13, 2007 11:15 AM  Permalink
Environmental Impact:
SSCP is a sea-based channel and hence comparing it to Panama or Suez canal (both of which are land-based) is absolutely incorrect. Such a project has never ever been executed anywhere else in the world, still there are no proper impact studies done for this. Following are the possible environmental risks, just to name a few: tsunami impacts, risk of high temperature zones getting exposed, risk to biodiversity of the region. There are too many issues here and no impact analysis study has been done so far.

Economic non-viability of the project:
There are already expert studies which have concluded economic non-viability of the SSCP project. It's not a land-based channel but an all sea passage. It's going to be only 300m wide. This means the passage will need frequent clearing of sand. It also means ships more than 30000 Tons can't avail the passage, effectively ruling out big cargo/container ships. The ships taking the passage will have to avail 'pilot-ships' facility. The ships will have to sail slow and may save only 1.5 Hrs of travel time. Effectively, these overheads will offset the fuel savings.

The cottage industries in the nearby coastal region are likely to be adversely impacted. The fishermen are likely to run into severe restrictions if the SSCP channel paves way for international passage.

Above mentioned are just a tip of the iceberg, please refer to URLs mentioned below for details.

Please come forward in large numbers to save this historic

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Why the Ram Setu must not be destroyed?
by SSCD on Sep 13, 2007 11:15 AM  Permalink
Please come forward in large numbers to save this historic monument.

Please find a very informative presentation by Dr. S. Kalyanraman at
http://www.slideshare.net/kalyan97/ramasetu4sept2007/

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jai Shri Ram
by Ganapati Hegde on Sep 13, 2007 11:13 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Shri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya JayaShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya Ram RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya Ram

Hare Ram Hare Ram Hare Ram Hare Ram

Ram Ram Hare Hare

Shri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya JayaShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya Ram RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya Ram

Hare Ram Hare Ram Hare Ram Hare Ram

Ram Ram Hare Hare
Shri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya JayaShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya Ram RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya Ram

Hare Ram Hare Ram Hare Ram Hare Ram

Ram Ram Hare HareShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya JayaShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya Ram RamShri Ram Jaya Ram Jaya Jaya Ram

Hare Ram Hare Ram Hare Ram Hare Ram

Ram Ram Hare Hare


All Hindus flood the message board with Hare Ram Chant as a symbol of respect and devotion to Lord Rama and protest against the blasphemy committed by the Congis.

Vande Mataram !!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Jai Shri Ram
by Truth Teller on Sep 13, 2007 11:20 AM  Permalink
Just chanting doesn't change unreal to real.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Truth is Truth, False is False whether we beleive it or not. Why don't someone prove to court?
by Truth Teller on Sep 13, 2007 11:11 AM  Permalink 

It is ASI's finding, not Government politicians, now any one can disprove because it is

infront of court who ultimately decides which is just as per law. Sometimes it is very

very difficult to digest these kind of news(facts as per ASI), especially when you and

all your household beleive from birth. I recommend whoever has the proof should present

infront of the court instead of these discussions in media. Can't in India anyone who

can keep a lawyer who can defend or prove against ASI?

But remember just because we beleived, truth will not become false or false become

truth. E.g., many centuries people beleieved earth is flat, or sun going around earth...

did they change just because we believed. When the proof came beleiefs have to change

accordingly otherwise we making ourselves liars and our children followers of the lie.

Your belief determinse your destiny

Sometime back I read in Competetive Success(I ma sure you can refer to may other

hostorical books), a magazine that many Group 1 exam takers prepare had secion on

persons Past, mentioned Jesus 4B.C Budha ~500BC Mohemmed ~500AD there they showed

Valmiki ~800BC and Vedavyas ~800BC as Sanskrit poets, who wrote stories, why didn;t this

agitation takes place then? You know more thing Valmiki is contemperor of Ram as per

Ramayana... i.e Valmiki wrote part of Ramayana as they lived in same age. how is it

possible one who lived 170000years back and one who lived

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Truth is Truth, False is False whether we beleive it or not. Why don't someone prove to court?
by Truth Teller on Sep 13, 2007 11:10 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It is ASI's finding, not Government politicians, now any one can disprove because it is

infront of court who ultimately decides which is just as per law. Sometimes it is very

very difficult to digest these kind of news(facts as per ASI), especially when you and

all your household beleive from birth. I recommend whoever has the proof should present

infront of the court instead of these discussions in media. Can't in India anyone who

can keep a lawyer who can defend or prove against ASI?

But remember just because we beleived, truth will not become false or false become

truth. E.g., many centuries people beleieved earth is flat, or sun going around earth...

did they change just because we believed. When the proof came beleiefs have to change

accordingly otherwise we making ourselves liars and our children followers of the lie.

Your belief determinse your destiny

Sometime back I read in Competetive Success(I ma sure you can refer to may other

hostorical books), a magazine that many Group 1 exam takers prepare had secion on

persons Past, mentioned Jesus 4B.C Budha ~500BC Mohemmed ~500AD there they showed

Valmiki ~800BC and Vedavyas ~800BC as Sanskrit poets, who wrote stories, why didn;t this

agitation takes place then? You know more thing Valmiki is contemperor of Ram as per

Ramayana... i.e Valmiki wrote part of Ramayana as they lived in same age. how is it

possible one who lived 170000years back and one who lived

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Truth is Truth, False is False whether we beleive it or not. Why don't someone prove to court?
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 11:13 AM  Permalink
I Literally Dont understand your Language
Sorry

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Main web site , this is not seen
by Gajanan Mohite on Sep 13, 2007 11:08 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Some black in the doll.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Main web site , this is not seen
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 11:14 AM  Permalink
Which DOLL became BLACK ??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hindus are living proof that Lord Ram existed.
by Ganapati Hegde on Sep 13, 2007 10:57 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

We Hindus are the living proof that Lord Ram existed.

Jai Shri Ram

Vande Mataram !!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Hindus are living proof that Lord Ram existed.
by phaneendra shanthigrama on Sep 13, 2007 11:05 AM  Permalink
Jai Hanuman

Pls. Save the Sethu constructed by you.You can only do this.

Jai Bhagaranj Bali, Pls. give strength to us to fight aginst Raakshas( UIPA and pseudo seculars)and to protect the setheu.

Sri Ram Jai Ram Jai Jai Ram ...



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Existence of Rama
by James Bond on Sep 13, 2007 10:56 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Does the congress have guts to stop Ram Lilas in north or can congress stop participating in Dusshera. By the way, Manmohan Singh and Sonia ji when are you converting to Islam. We are sick of seeing you, you will be better behind Burka.

James Bond

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Existence of Rama
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 02:32 PM  Permalink
There is no bigger curse than ignorance. Use Logic! We all know that no science can prove existence of GOD, whether its Allah or Bhagwan .If its an assumption than why not assume God to be ultimate like Allah.Ram was too weak to be a God... Either Ram was God or a Person?
Boss wake up%u2026. There r ample proof of God existance... Yes there is a God or super power but that never matches the character called Rama,he doesn't qualify to be called as God even if we consider Ramayan True.

I say without disgust there is no proof, I hv, of existance of God but ...Its my assumption .I say I don't hv the capacity to know how he looks like but surely better than light pure from all impurity, weaknesses.He is the creator,sustainer & cherisher of all the universe all in one ,Ultimate in all respect%u2026.. that qualify to be my GOD nothing less. Did u see the movie of Children of Lesser God ? So its ur decision whoes childern u want to be...


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Existence of Rama
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 11:06 AM  Permalink
James Bond,
I understand your Sentiments, but you always pull Islam into everything, No Muslim said anything against RAM, then why are you Yelling ??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
All Hindus Vote Against UPA and pseudo seculars
by phaneendra shanthigrama on Sep 13, 2007 10:53 AM  Permalink 

Dear Hindus,

If you really love your religion and culture, pls. vote for the party who can protect us.Pls. donot lose the chance to wipe out anti hindus from HINDUSTHAN.

Pls. donot sit at Home , during next election , which is fast approaching.Come forward and cast your right.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
The Archaeological Survey of India
by James Bond on Sep 13, 2007 10:53 AM  Permalink 

Has The Archaeological Survey of India submitted any report to any court against Shiela Dixit for buying a house which is very near to the boundary wall of Humayun Tomb where the notice board reads as, "Construction within 100 meters of this wall is not allowed".

We cannot expect congressmen to die of shame as they are "Khandani Besharam".



    Forward  |  Report abuse
kaliyug
by wajid on Sep 13, 2007 10:52 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


people wont believe each other, then how they will believe in the god, those who are fighting in the name of religion are fighting for their own selfish magalomaniac means, Shit with the politicians.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:kaliyug
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 11:10 AM  Permalink
Hello Sid,

Yes I agree with you, if all the Non-Muslims pay ZAKAAT & all Muslims pay Jiziya, then there will be no Poverty in our Country and India will become a Super Power.

The Truth about Jiziya is as follows
KNOW ABOUT JIZIYA...
JIZIYA is the Tax Payed by Un-Beleivers in countries adopting Islamic Law...Many people think that the Jiziya is a Heavy Tax imposed on Non-beleivers of Islam. But kindly note that it is more compulsory for Muslims to pay a Tax..
The Fourth Pillar of Islam is ZAKAATH, it is also called Charity for the Poor. According to Shariat Law, it is mandatory for every Muslim to pay 2.5 % of his savings and Property for the Poor.. Which means if I have 100 acres, I have to give 2.5 acres as Charity...
Since the Muslims have to Pay ZAKAAT, Jiziya is exempted for them.. For Un-beleivers Jiziya Tax is collected.. It is no different from the Normal Tax system...
The only reason why Muslims don't pay Jiziya Tax is they are supposed to pay Zakaat, which is the responsibility of every beleiver..
Hope it clarifies... Jiziya...



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:kaliyug
by meraj on Sep 13, 2007 11:17 AM  Permalink
Good reply & it is the TRUTH.

Md. Meraj

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:kaliyug
by Superwoman on Sep 13, 2007 11:14 AM  Permalink
U have become mad. Where is the question of Muslims in this? Pls. do not incite people unnecessarily...

A devout Hindu.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:kaliyug
by Danial Fakih on Sep 13, 2007 02:38 PM  Permalink

They hv the right to exist but as slaves.Coz still u r slave of ur politician,corruption etc.etc.Believe me u guys don't hv guts to rule but to be ruled.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:kaliyug
by Gladiator on Sep 13, 2007 11:15 AM  Permalink
I jsut replied to SID, you dont go Mad

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 9300 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30   Older >   >>
Write a message