RE:No evidence to prove existence of Ram, Centre to SC
by Pradeep Kumar on Sep 12, 2007 04:03 PM Permalink
Abe stop being some filmy idiot and open ur mind and think
RE:No evidence to prove existence of Ram, Centre to SC
by iluvtaj on Sep 12, 2007 04:09 PM Permalink
what that we do not have HINDU RELIGION, we do not have GODS, WE SHOULD NOT HAVE TEMPLES, WE SHOULD NOT PRAY....................
just come to the middle east or any islamic country and tell this word, it might sound greek and latin to them.out of 57 nations, only turkey shows a bit of tolerance that too under European pressure, we hindus are loosing our tolerance level becoz of the injustice happening against us
RE:Tolerance- what is this ?i
by parvez khaja hussain on Sep 12, 2007 04:29 PM Permalink
So kids go and read ved, reghved... you will find hindus are mis guided by Bharamins (upper cast).
RE:Tolerance- what is this ?i
by vinoth chandrasekar on Sep 12, 2007 06:27 PM Permalink
u r a true moslem, becoz naturally u proved that u dnt know what's tolerance, learn it from us. v have been tolerant enought that u refugees are given freedom for everything and u guys dnt know the meaning of hospitality and betray the people who welcomed u guys. . first u r a moslem then an indian right, hahahaha. so strt writing Natioanlity- Muslim, occupation- terrorist
RE:Tolerance- what is this ?i
by vinoth chandrasekar on Sep 12, 2007 04:04 PM Permalink
the reason why we are losing tolerance is, nomads and un civilized refugees are ruling our country and spoiling our divine faith, now by telling that there was no1 called Ram, its like telling us, hey u Hindus, u were born without Father (Test tube baby)
We as muslims dont have any intention to disturb the believes of others. It is purely task of the INDIAN govt. to allow or not allow Ram sethu.. I dont think minority will give vote for them, only because of taking a dicision like this. The one who is trying to grag minority and etc with this issue is looking on split between community and thus the vote bank
RE:Please dont drag minorities to this issue
by ashwani dhiman on Sep 12, 2007 04:43 PM Permalink
Yes, I do agree we should not drag the others except congress which right from the begining has played divide and rule policy and the converted chrisitains are more dangerous than any other.Jai Shree Ram
RE:Please dont drag minorities to this issue
by SURIYAPRAGASH KRISHNAMOORTHY on Sep 12, 2007 04:30 PM Permalink
We are also not against muslims. But, the problem is that this is done by a Government which is hell bent on appeasing muslims and christians. And as you can see in this forum while most of the hindus are writing about their feelings and heartburn, there are some musalmans and converted christians making mockery of Hindus and Hinduism.
RE:Why rss OPPOSING
by Nitin Tripathi on Sep 12, 2007 04:03 PM Permalink
Then why the Goverment in southern states are advocating reservation to Muslims? If they are more educated, cultured and mature then why they need any kind of reservation? Please reply.
RE:Why rss OPPOSING
by Aadi Manav on Sep 12, 2007 04:07 PM Permalink
A muslim and dalit hindu in South India is well educated and matured than upper caste hindu from North India.The reservation required because the north indians being illeterate and uneducated grab all the seats irrespective of their incapability..
RE:RE:Why rss OPPOSING
by top Prakash on Sep 12, 2007 04:07 PM Permalink
What a Joke Aadi Manav,
We found people making temple for Movie stars in South. People are cutting their tounge for their stars in South. A Woman leader assaulted in Assembly in south. People are trying to destroy the institution like AIIMS for their ego are from South. People voting for TV an, Liquor and rice are from South.
If all above mentioend actions are the symbol of literacy then only Aadi Manav (monolithic) will think that people of south are more educated and wisdomful.
Youself too is an example of educated level in South.
RE:Why rss OPPOSING
by gunesh marathe on Sep 12, 2007 04:13 PM Permalink
why rss .. ALL hindus should appose. It is not wrong to come to power using hindu card, what congress has done last 60 yeras, musalmano ke pair chat rahi thi..BJP at least speak in support of hindu,which no party dare
RE:No evidence to prove existence of Ram
by Nitin Tripathi on Sep 12, 2007 04:08 PM Permalink
... only if educated people like you go out to vote. Otherwise one day Hindus will be in minorities.
RE:No evidence to prove existence of Ram
by on Sep 12, 2007 04:23 PM Permalink
I completely disapprove of what the center has to say about the existence of Ram.If we do not respect our own religion who will? Whihcother country would allow such a bill to pass? If others are progressing it is because they respect themselves and are united.From ages its been a trade mark quality of we Indians that we disregard and criticize our own culture and values and bow down to others. As far as the elections are concerned no vote cast by the educated person has reflected in the results. The illiterates mindlessly cast their votes in exchange for some cheap alcohol. We need a revolution now.
On what basis courts need the proof of existence of RAM?
If the court can honour the Holy book "Bhagwat Gita" and ask the people to take oath on that book, then RAM is one of the incarnations mentioned in that Holi Book. Why do they need to establish the evidence now?
Is our Supreme court becoming silly day by day? Now the time to establish the competency and sensibility of the supreme court judges and the benches and all together the Supreme court has come.
This is becoming a political discussion here. But it is not. It is not a political matter. No government can establish the evidence of God or his existence. On the other hand they can not establish the evidence of non existence of God as well.
It is the foolish ness of the court to ask for the evidence. The government should in reply state that "It could not get hold of the evidence to establish the exitence." Rather than concluding that there is no evidence. Who knows whether there is any evidence or not. As on date and as on the persons assigned the job, could not get hold of it.
On the other hand, the government could have said that the same belief and respect that the court is giving to the GITA led to the conclusion that there was RAM and his existence in that particular period at that particular place.
RE:Existence of RAM - Why do Courts need the Proof?
by hinduhitler on Sep 12, 2007 04:03 PM Permalink
They may ban Bhagwat Gita too in the courts , (hurting minority religious sentiments).
RE:Existence of RAM - Why do Courts need the Proof?
by VSRao Nanduri on Sep 12, 2007 04:08 PM Permalink
You are right. This is all unnecessary drama. every knows what the fact is? but we are not used to come on to roads and kill some one who is against our beliefs. That's why any one can say any thing to our Gods.
RE:messengers of islam
by zenab on Sep 12, 2007 04:08 PM Permalink
The center is Hindu dominated so where the question comes of it supporting islam.The hindus themselves are questioning their own existence
RE:messengers of islam
by SURIYAPRAGASH KRISHNAMOORTHY on Sep 12, 2007 04:35 PM Permalink
U cannot say that. Most of the ministers are non hindus (or) pseudo hindus elected from south and Left parties. You cannot consider any of them as Hindus. Only minorities can be happy in India.
All congress rules states have only non hindu chief ministers. this is for your information.
