RE:Lord Rama
by Shoumya on Sep 12, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
Frankly I really dont give a shit what the pseudo hindu groups here think. If the billion strong ppl gave into their demands...we wud nt have the "so called UNIFIED Bharat". Instead we wud only have hindus and hindus alone. Like Mr Modi his grand plan of social extermination worked wonders in Gujrat...Bravo..Bravo to Mr Modi. Ofcourse one can vote for the BJP in coming elections. They expect sumthing like this wud happen newayz...Har Har Har. However its to the sensible ppl of the country 2 decide, not the realigion gingoists 2 marr every attempt made by the politically incorrect govt. You know u shud give a damn about religious sentiments....becuz if u dnt u wud end up on the wrong side of the law. Morally that is. The bridge needs to be built for reasons best known 2 the govt. But that surely does nt give us "PROUDY" hindus to go on a rampage to tell the rest of the morons what is history and wat is proven scientific fact. The rest remains to the politically incorrect govt 2 decide.
RE:Lord Rama
by on Sep 12, 2007 04:49 PM Permalink
u ppl r as usual fools he is pakistani he born brought up in pakistan and he is Dalit so he is angry with largerly hindus n hate them as well as sonia who is foreigner n christian doesnot like people over here and most of the allies in UPA r Muslim major or muslims leaders so they all have joined hands to destroy this nation n hinduism n moreover can't u see from face manmohan singh is looking like joru ka gulaam in his face the slavery is written . at the current scenario we do not have any person in the polity who could be PM with grit n genuine leader
RE:and
by Jayaprakash Achar on Sep 12, 2007 04:52 PM Permalink
They cannot destroy the Bridge..in case if UPA governement allows the that destruction of bridge...I will create team of Hindu's to destroy the culprits behind that act......
RE:bAN ALL RELIGIONS
by Imran on Sep 12, 2007 04:52 PM Permalink
Its not only muslims who are dangerous anyone following a religion can be danger to society one way or the other.
RE:@ HINDUS
by Lakshminarayan Jayaram on Sep 12, 2007 04:50 PM Permalink
Laugh man...but know that ur ancestors took the easy way out and got converted for money, or probably forced with pain to leave their hindu religion. But we remaining hindus will fight to protect hinduism from getting extinct.
RE:@ HINDUS
by mukesh agrawal on Sep 12, 2007 04:58 PM Permalink
tum log kitana jaldi tumhari okat par utar aate ho........tumhara kuch nahi ho sakata ha............yhe bloody goverment tumhare hi kandhe par bandook rakh kar tumako goli mar rahi ha .....and you poor guys...not getting this simple fact..........bhagwan tumako sadbuddi de tumhari raksha kare........jai shri Ram
RE:@ HINDUS
by Malaya on Sep 12, 2007 04:51 PM Permalink
abey isme hasne ki kya baat hai. Dont tell the story that Propphet cut the moon in two halves to non mumslims lese they will laugh and ya even dont tell that at 9 years of age she was adult
RE:do you have any evidence?
by desparado desparado on Sep 12, 2007 04:45 PM Permalink
We have the evidence for the existence of jesus. so tell me now do you have the proof for existence of rama. tell me how did rama died.
RE:do you have any evidence?
by Classified on Sep 12, 2007 04:47 PM Permalink
If a virigin can conceive and give birth, then we need to reinvent nature and study science all over again...
RE:do you have any evidence?
by hiral joshi on Sep 12, 2007 04:48 PM Permalink
Rama died by self-immersion in to river Saryu. Can you tell us how jesus died, how he reappered and how again he disappeared? Did he live and die twice?
RE:do you have any evidence?
by Abdul Bashar on Sep 12, 2007 04:48 PM Permalink
where's the evidence? show me the videos. show me evidence that the videos are not digitally doctored. show me evidence that the evidence is not doctored.
You can't win these arguments.
This was a wrong thing for congress to say.
Today they say against hindu. Tomrow against Islam and Christ.
RE:RE:RE:do you have any evidence?
by on Sep 12, 2007 05:04 PM Permalink
Congress is trying to divert attension of the people from the developments or may be from the current political crisis due to Nuclear policy. THEY ARE PLAYING GAME SO PLEASE BEWARE AND NOT TRY TO BLAME EACH OTHER. THEIR GOAL IS THAT ONLY.
RE:do you have any evidence?
by on Sep 12, 2007 04:52 PM Permalink
even rama existence and ramayan n mahabharat existence is there that is how india places name temples n there very presence there since 5000 years in this land of india where as u idiot chrisitians n islamist wre not to this land u were outside away from this place and the outsider converted u f - a-g and so u wont be knowing . there is no proof tht jesus was messenger of god and there is no proof that muhmad did all great deeds or messenger of god enough to be followed by sane people.
RE:RE:do you have any evidence?
by hiral joshi on Sep 12, 2007 04:50 PM Permalink
No nothing is proven. Most of the evidences are co-inciding with Bible, which was written much after the death of so-called jesus. Unless you have eye-witness or DNA of Jesus to relate his generations you cant prove.
see, i think the ramayana and mahabharata are the greatest philosophical and spiritual texts available to man, but honestly, it cant be true. for a court to recognize anything, it needs evidence so theres nothing the court can do about this..ramayana is a mythological text..maybe some of those events are true, but the entire thing cannot possible be true..people dont realise that maybe the bridge existed even when valmiki wrote the ramayana and maybe he thought that he could incorporate that into the story..just because the bridge is there, it doesnt prove that ramayana was true..that said, it doesnt matter whether it was true or not..the truths contained in those texts are unmatched..and the govt cannot destroy the bridge because it holds great value for those who want to believe..if they want to destroy the bridge, then they might as well go destroy all temples and mosques cuz God is everywhere, and not just in temples and mosques
