Being a Muslim, I do understand the outrage of Hindus. As far beliefs are concerned I might be miles apart from Hindu brethren, but as a practicing believer i feel very sad at this sorry state of affairs of our country. Govt should be resolving problem and not be a problem.
There are some miscreant, devious minds on this board trying to inflame and settle personal messaging fights, which is very unfair.
For the muslim members I would ask not to abuse any religion and if others are doing it to you, it is their naivety and ignorance pleas be patient with them. If anyone abuses my faith I do get hurt.
Does not Allah command you:
"O believers, be you securers of justice, witness for God. Let not detestation for a people move you not to be equitable; be equitable - that is nearer to God-fearing." (5:8)
"You who believe, do not let one (set of) people make fun of another set."
"Do not defame one another."
"Do not insult by using nicknames."
"Do not backbite or speak ill of one another."
(49:11-12)
"There should be no coercion in the matter of faith." (2:256)
This news is deeply disturbing. Though I am an atheist, this news HAS hurt me. So, this govt is handing an issue on a golden platter to ... u all know whom?
How dare you say "no 'historical record' to incontrovertibly prove the existence of the character, or the occurrences of the events, depicted" in the Ramayana.
Do you have any Historical Records to prove that your forefathers begat you?
The Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Upanishad and the Vedas were not written down but handed down, by word-of-mouth, from father to son; and if you Thootias are not aware of this I hope that the learned judges of the Supreme Court of the India are not as idiotic as you.
By the way what does Sonia Gandhi have to say about the Bible which (originally orally communicated, too) does not have, nor gives, a firm proof ("show me the birth certifcate") or a date-lined chronicled written record about the birth of Christ.
There are no correct "historical records" of many things that happened even a few years back. So why put Hindus at a disadvantage in what is essentially their own land ?!?!?!
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by malcom a on Sep 12, 2007 05:05 PM Permalink
Communication experts of NASA say that false, suspect news finds much greater circulation than normal because of the internet. NASA's Hess said, "The images reproduced on the websites may well be ours, but their interpretation is certainly not ours."
RE:RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by Cutlet Gravy on Sep 12, 2007 05:21 PM Permalink
We are aware of this.
NASA's Hess can not give incontrovertal proof.
You see he was not present at the time when Ram Sethu was built by Lord Rama.
That does not mean Ram Sethu was not built.
Now there is proof that "certain people" like DMK as well as other convicts and converts are out to hit Hindu sentiments, under water and even below the belt in what was, and still is, essentially HINDU land.
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by bahmophet on Sep 12, 2007 05:08 PM Permalink
dont u worry sanatana dharma will win again. the lord says in the GITA, SAMBAVAMI YUGE YUGE.....
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by just reacting on Sep 12, 2007 05:06 PM Permalink
Spotted on a matchbox - If you heard 2 eyewitness accounts of an accident, you will wonder about history!
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by ravi shanker alugulapati on Sep 12, 2007 05:12 PM Permalink
Even Hindus may say that Jesus was crucified on Rape Charges, Hooliganism etc which you mistook as God and same thing may apply to Mohamed but does it mean it is true???
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by SAAHIL on Sep 12, 2007 05:07 PM Permalink
THEN WHY DID RAM WENT TO SRILANKA.. FOR SITA RITE SO WHT DID HE WAS DOING TO HER.. AND IF HE DIDNT DO ANYTHING THEN .... WHOSE LUV AND KUSH
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by ware vm on Sep 12, 2007 05:09 PM Permalink
Yes you are veyry true, he was not god, he was born as a man, just to teach the poeple that even a simple man can fight to the biggest evil and for that you should not have to be god or flashy tools to show people that you are god. and if you really think he is just a man, try and dare to live life like him.
RE:No ''historical record'' to incontrovertibly prove the existence ?!?!
by sanjay choudhry on Sep 12, 2007 05:08 PM Permalink
What is so holy about Jesus? He has been proved to be a gay and bible says he used to kiss his male disciples on their lips.
Do you have any proof that a corpse can fly and reach heaven? Show me one proof that virgins can give birth.
You converts sit in our country, practise imported religions ,about the ancient culture of your own land and race and then "jis thaali mein khate ho, use mein ched karto ho."
Why don't the Eminent Historians (as Arun Shourie calls them) come up with some proof that the Ramayan was a prehistoric comic book? The ASI would have some more rich stuff to swear to in the Supreme Court. After all, how can any historian from JNU ever be wrong??
Guys please re-read the last line of this article....It says everything :
'The Centre and state of Tamil Nadu are hell bent on removing Ram Sethu as they have refused to take any of six alternative routes suggested for Sethusamudram.'
It claerly shows that Sonia Gandhi is hell bent upon destroying anything remotely linked to hinduism....
RE:The last line fo this article says it all.........
by ujwal mehta on Sep 12, 2007 05:04 PM Permalink
http://www.sysindia.com/forums/General_Discussion/posts/49247.html
RE:The last line fo this article says it all.........
by vimal kumar on Sep 12, 2007 05:14 PM Permalink
Sir, this line has been written by this reporter in his choice of words. It is not a statement or a quote made by the first person
Mahatma father of our nation said at his end -HEY RAM" Our Govt.leaders who boast of Mahatma by adding his name to their names, praise mahatma as great - say "NO RAM" - FOR THEM I WISH - RAM NAM SATYA HAI
RE:RAJA RAM : WHY GOD ??
by dheeraj kumar on Sep 12, 2007 05:04 PM Permalink
Abey kuch bhi bol but himmat hai to apne asli naam se comment kar. Kitna jaanta hai Ram ke bare mein. Bar-bar band kar aur chup chap nikal le patli gali se.
RE:RAJA RAM : WHY GOD ??
by neetu on Sep 12, 2007 05:07 PM Permalink
u can say the same thing for every GOD beleived in world that they did for themselves or their empire......Bevkooof naari....
Advice to u first leave the land of kafirs and go to pakistan .
Seconed things is this that how many peoples will believe that Mohammed without rocket went to moon and cut into two parts and ya waht was the age of aisha at that time... ?
